The Reception of Georges Florovsky's Ideas: The Contemporary Context
Abstract
The article gives an overview of modern researches about G.V. Florovsky’s philosophical and theological works. The author of article considered various images of Florovsky presented in scientific literature. In author’s opinion, modern period in study of Russian philosophy is the time of critical researches which will open Florovsky’s ideas for general discussion.
About the Author
Anatoly Cheryaev
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Флоровский Г., прот. Догмат и история. – М., 1998. С. 56.
2. The Development of the USSR. An Exchange of Views. – Seattle, 1964.
3. Гаврюшин Н.К. Русское богословие. Очерки и портреты. – Нижний Новгород, 2011. С. 530.
4. Посадский А.В., Посадский С.В. Историко-культурный путь России в контексте философии Г.В. Флоровского. – СПб., 2004.
5. Плигузов А.И. Историографические заметки о «нестяжательстве» // Архив русской истории. Вып. 2. – М., 1992. С. 33.
6. Tomson F.J. Peter Mogila’s Ecclesiastical Reforms and Ukrainian Contribution of Russian Culture. A Critique of Georges Florovsky’s Theory of the Pseudomorphosis of Orthodoxy // Slavica Gandensia. 1993. Vol. XX. P. 67 – 119.
7. Show L.F. The Philosophical Evolution of Georges Florovsky: Philosophical Psychology and Philosophy of History // St. Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly. – N.Y., 1992. Vol. XXXVI. № 3. P. 237 – 255.
8. Gallaher B. «Waiting for the Barbarians»: Identity and Polemicism in the Neo-patristic Synthesis of Georges Florovsky // Modern Theology. October 2011. P. 659 - 691.
9. Гаврюшин Н.К. Русское богословие. Очерки и портреты. С. 508.
10. Gavrilyuk P.L. Harnack’s Hellenized Christianity or Florovsky’s «Sacred Hellenism»: Questioning Two Metanarratives of Early Christian Engagement with Late Antique Culture // St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly. 2010. № 54 (3 – 4). P. 323 – 344.
Review
For citations:
Cheryaev A. The Reception of Georges Florovsky's Ideas: The Contemporary Context. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2013;(10):71-76. (In Russ.)
Email this article 