Dogmatic Audit

The article deals with the critical analysis of the genesis of patristic thought during the period of the First Seven Ecumenical Councils, when the basic, trinitarian, christological and mariological dogmas were formulated. The author shows that, in spite of the terminology borrowed from Hellenic wisdom, Church Fathers could not move «from myth to logos», confining themselves only to liturgical formulations necessary for liturgical practice and the organization of the church. The wealth of opportunities for personalistic discourse that was provided by the Christian «Good News» was never revealed, largely because Christianity became a state ideology, not a living personalistic thought. Moreover, at the time of the formation of the church with the monarchical ecclesiastical hierarchy, there was a direct rollback from personalistic discourse towards the religion of law, the classical example of which was proto-Judaism. So Christ was crucified again.

догмат, теургия, таинство, каппадокийцы, ипостась, роль, субстанция, модус, атрибут, апория, монофелиты, монофизиты, тропос существования, сотериология, палингенесия, cumenical Council, dogma, theurgy, sacrament, Cappadocians, hypostasis, substance, modus, attribute, aporia, tropos of existence, soteriology, palingenesis

1. Владимиров А. Кумран и Христос. - М.: Беловодье, 2002.

2. Гроф С. За пределами мозга. - М.: Институт трансперсональной психологии, 2000.

3. Словарь русского языка / под ред. А.П. Евгеньевой. В 4 т. Т. 1. - М.: Русский язык, 1985.

4. Лосский В.Н. Догматическое богословие // Лосский В.Н. Боговедение. - М.: АСТ, 2003.

5. Иоанн Мейендорф, протоиерей. Введение в святоотеческое богословие. - Вильнюс; М.: Весть, 1992.

6. Иоанн Мейендорф, протоиерей. Византийское богословие. - Мн.: Лучи Софии, 2007.

7. Талбот М. Голографическая Вселенная. - М.: София, 2003.