The Reality of the Historical Past: The Heideggerian Turn in Paul Ricœur’s Reflection on History

In recent decades, the question of the reality of the historical past has risen to the forefront of analysis, not only in historiography or historical theory but also in literary criticism. In different forms, a tendency has come to expression in these disciplines that blurs the distinction between historical representation and fictional narrative, and casts suspicion on the historian’s claim to uncover a measure of “reality” of the historical past. This article examines Paul Ricœur’s critical response, in different periods of his work, to the challenge raised by historical skepticism. It focuses on how Ricœur, after a period of initial criticism of Heidegger’s philosophy in his works of the 1980s and early 1990s, appropriates in his late work Memory, History and Forgetting, a number of key concepts that Heidegger proposed in Being and Time and reformulates them to buttress his theory of the reality of the historical past. The aim of this article is less to provide an exegesis of Ricœur’s conception of historical understanding, than to critically examine the theory of the “reality” of the historical past that he developed during different periods of his work.

исторический скептицизм, Рикёр, Хайдеггер, Кол-лингвуд, Уайт, Барт, историческое воображение, трансцендентальная схема, historical skepticism, Ricœur, Heidegger, Collingwood, White, Barthes, historical knowledge, historical imagination, transcendental schematism

1. Рикёр П. Память, история, забвение. - М.: Издательство гуманитарной литературы, 2004.

2. Рикёр П. Я-сам как другой. - М.: Издательство гуманитарной литературы, 2008.

3. Barthes R. Le discours de l’histoire. Bruissements de la langue. Essais critiques IV. - Paris: Seuil, 1984.

4. Collingwood R.g. The Idea of History. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1956.

5. Diderot D. Éloge de Richardson // Diderot D. Œuvres. - Paris: Gallimard (Bibliothèque de la Pléiade).

6. Koselleck R. Hermeneutik und Historik. Zeitschichten. Studien zur Historik. Mit einem Beitrag von Hans-Georg Gadamer. - Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000.

7. Nietzsche F. Vom Nutzen und Nachteil der Historie für das Leben. - Stuttgart: Reclam, 2009.

8. Ricœur Р. Temps et récit. Vol. 3. - Paris: Seuil, 1985.

9. Ricœur Р. «La marque du passé», Mémoire, Histoire // Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale. № 1. Mars 1998. P. 7-32.

10. Ricœur P. Lectures 2. La contrée des philosophes. - Paris: Seuil, 1989.

11. Ricœur Р. Les philosophies critiques de l’histoire: Recherche, explication, écriture // Philosophical Problems Today / ed. By G. Fløistad. - Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994.

12. Ricœur P. Pourquoi se souvenir du passé historique? // Ricœur P. La pensé en dialogue / ed.by J. Porée and G. Vincent. - Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2010.

13. Rousseau J.-J. Émile ou de l’éducation. Livre 4. - Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1966.

14. Schopenhauer А. Über Geschichte. Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. Vol. 2, 2. - Zürich: Diogenes, 1977.

15. White H. The Historical Text and Literary Artifact (1974). Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism. - Baltimore; L.: Johns Hopkins, 1978.

16. White Н. The Question of Narrative in Contemporary Historical Theory // The Content of the Form. Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. - Baltimore et L.: Johns Hopkins, 1987.