Continuities of Pragmatism, Settling Metaphysical Disputes and the Analytic-Continental Divide. Part II

The author examines the history of pragmatism and maintains that a thematic continuity runs through the classical pragmatists, neopragmatists and contemporary pragmatists. This continuity can be vaguely characterized as an integration of theory and practice, but experience gives theory its content such that action is always guiding the formation of knowledge. There are four implications of this continuity. Pragmatists are centrally concerned with the human relationship to a process-oriented and evolving conception of nature. For pragmatists, our beliefs are regarded not as propositions that map onto a separate and fixed reality, but instead their truth emerges out of the habits beliefs generate. Pragmatism emphasizes an openness to possibility since our access to the world of experience is mediated by a variety of selective interests, intellectual histories, varying linguistic and discursive practices. Pragmatists are deeply concerned with the social and political problems that confront us on a daily basis. The author also examines the manner in which James understands the term “metaphysics” given that pragmatism is a method for settling “metaphysical disputes.” Jamesian existential pluralism implies to maximize all possibilities that can satisfy everyone as much as possible without impeding and harming another's capacity to experience a rich and novel world. The author analyzes Todd May’s approach to the analytic-continental divide and concludes that if settlement embraces James’s thick conception of experience, then the resulting ontological pluralism is the best settlement possible, and this commitment to pluralism requires dissolving the exclusionary practices the analytic-continental divide suggests philosophically.

прагматизм, Уильям Джеймс, аналитиико-континентальный раскол, метафизика, радикальный эмпиризм, антифундаментализм, опыт, плюрализм, мелиоризм, pragmatism, William James, analytic-continental divide, metaphysics, radical empiricism, anti-foundationalism, experience, pluralism, meliorism

1. Campbell J. (2017) Experiencing William James: Belief in a Pluralistic World. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

2. Hackett J.E. (2018) Persons and Values in Pragmatic Phenomenology. Vernon Press.

3. James W. (1884) On Some Omissions of Introspective Psychology. Mind. Vol. 9. January 1884.

4. James W. (1897) The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. New York: Longman and Green.

5. James W. (1979) Some Problems of Philosophy. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

6. James W. (1985) Psychology: The Briefer Course. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

7. James W. (1996) A Pluralistic Universe. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.

8. James W. (1998) Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

9. James W. (2003) Essays in Radical Empiricism. New York: Dover Publications.

10. Lamberth D. (1999) William James and the Metaphysics of Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11. May T. (2002). On the Very Idea of Continental (or for that Matter Anglo-American) Philosophy. Metaphilosophy. Vol. 33. No. 4 (July 2002), pp. 401-425.

12. McDermott J.J. (1976) Introduction. In: James W. Essays in Radical Empiricism. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.