Chinese Rationality in the Modern World
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2018-7-24-37
Abstract
The article focuses on the key issues of contemporary Chinese academic publications on the specifcs of Chinese rationality. Among its most common characteristics, there are focus on practice, attention to everyday life of society and individuals, pursuit of centrality and harmony in the moral sphere. Cross-cultural comparisons serve to justify the role of traditional rationality as a balancer keeping Chinese thought away from subjectivism, irrationalism, abstract reasoning and formalism. The researchers seek to identify the impacts of “applied rationality” upon the formation of positive features of Chinese national character. The widespread interpretation of Chinese practical rationality underlines the priority of practice of political governance over the theoretical reasoning about politics; in the moral sphere it leads to rejection of extremes in human behavior and sets the normative status of the middle path and harmony. The inclination of humans to keep their emotions under control and to take a proactive approach to the world was accompanied by recognition of the higher value of empirical experience and intuition compared to formal and abstract ideas. The focus on the secular life of people deprived the Chinese rationality of the “otherworldly” religious dimension. The participants of the discussion note that the Chinese culture has gained stability and “elasticity,” but it lacks Western formal rationality, which is a prerequisite for scientifc knowledge. Chinese researchers pay much attention to the impact of traditional rationality on the formation of Chinese philosophy in the 20th century and to the choice of socio-political path of national development. The emphasis on the differences between the cultures ofChinaand the West is combined with searches for similarities between Chinese rationality and Marxism. That steers the discussion beyond the sphere of comparative studies and makes its content relevant to the understanding of broader set of contemporary problems.
About the Author
Alexander LomanovRussian Federation
D.Sc. in History, Main Research Fellow
References
1. Chen Ying (2008). “Shiyong lixing” – dui Zhongguo chuantong wenhua “shijian lixing” wujie de bianbo [“Practical Reason” – Refutationof Misunderstanding of “Practical Rationality” in Chinese TraditionalCulture]. Xue lilun = Theory Research. Issue 22, pp. 48–49 (in Chinese).
2. Guo Xianjun (2016). Zhongguo chuantong wenhua zhong shiyong lixing de biaoxian ji lishi zuoyong [Manifestations and Historical Functions of Practical Rationality in Chinese Traditional Culture]. Zhongzhou xuekan =Academic Journal of Zhongzhou. Issue 9, pp. 93–97 (in Chinese).
3. Lei Zhen (2016). Zhongguo chuantong rujia lunli de shijian lixing ji qiyunxing jizhi [Practical Rationality of Chinese Traditional Confucian Ethicsand Its Operating Mechanism]. Xueshu jiaoliu = Academic Exchange. Issue5, pp. 12–16 (in Chinese).
4. Li Hongwei (2014). 20 shiji Zhongguo lixingzhuyi zhexue de zhongjian –yi Liang Shuming, Feng Youlan, Mou Zongsan de “li xing” guannian weizhongxin [The Reconstruction of Chinese Rationalist Philosophy in the20th Century: Centered on the Concept of “Rationality” of Liang Shuming, Feng Youlan, and Mou Zongsan]. Hebei xuekan = Hebei Academic Journal. Issue 6, pp. 21–26 (in Chinese).
5. Ma Juxia (2010). Chuantong wenhua “shijian lixing” dui Zhongguo xuanze makesizhuyi de zuoyong [The Role of “Practical Rationality” of Traditional Culture in China’s Choice of Marxism]. Lilun daokan = Journalof Socialist Theory Guide. Issue 12, pp. 35–36 (in Chinese).
6. Meng Peiyuan (2004). Ren, li xing, jingjie – Zhongguo zhexue yanjiu zhong de san ge wenti [Human, Rationality, Realm: Three Problems in the Study of Chinese Philosophy]. Quanzhou shifan xueyuan xuebao = Journal of Quanzhou Normal University. Issue 3, pp. 13–22 (in Chinese).
7. Meng Peiyuan (2008). Zhongguo zhexue zhong de qinggan lixing [Sensitive Reason in Chinese Philosophy]. Zhexue dongtai = Philosophical Trends. Issue 3, pp. 19–24 (in Chinese).
8. Yang Guorong (2014). Zhongguo zhexue zhong de lixing guannian [The Idea of Rationality in Chinese Philosophy]. Wen shi zhe = Journal of Literature, History and Philosophy. Issue 2, pp. 31–37 (in Chinese).
9. Yu Hongwei (2013). Zhongguo chuantong shijian lixing de lishi fazhan yu juxian [Historical Development and Limitations of Chinese Traditional Practical Rationality]. Hubei shehui kexue = Hubei Social Science. Issue 3, pp. 94–98 (in Chinese).
10. Yu Jianjun, Ding Chengji (2014). Ruxue de shijianxing yu makesizhuyi zhongguohua [The Practicality of Confucianism and the Sinifcation of Marxism]. Tianjin daxue xuebao: shehui kexue ban = Journal of Tianjin University: Social Sciences. Issue 3, pp. 285–288 (in Chinese).
11. Zhang Jianyun (2017). Zhongguo chuantong wenhua de genben jingshen ji qi shidai jiazhi [The Fundamental Spirit and Epoch Value of Chinese Traditional Culture]. Qiusuo = Seeker. Issue 8, pp. 180–187 (in Chinese).
Review
For citations:
Lomanov A. Chinese Rationality in the Modern World. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2018;(7):24-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2018-7-24-37