Humanism, Humanitarian Values and the Search for the Foundations of Modern Bioethics

The article discusses the relationship of the axiological foundations of modern bioethics with casual and even incidental effects of the activity of scholars in the late Middle Ages and the Renaissance. The author examine the ability of humanists to influence the formation of values system as well as the possibility of instrumentalizing these values in social practices. The study determines the entire causal complex that led to the formation of a special tradition of non-religious substantiation of values associated with the teaching and study of ancient languages in the context of the functioning of political and legal institutions and cultural and historical traditions of European states. The author considers the origins and meaning of humanism and the gradual change of its content as well as the transformation of humanistic experience into a tool of constructing ideals and values and an element of social technology. A special place is given to the analysis of attempts to form meta-ethics and bioethics within the framework of the value system of post-Soviet Russian society and the role of humanistic ideas in this process. On the example of the development of modern European philosophical thought, the controversial and problematic nature of various interpretations of humanism is shown, and the thesis of the historical conditionality of the ideals of humanism and its connection with some certain paradigms of metaphysic is confirmed. The central theme of the article is the problem of the relationship between the historical and conceptual, conditional and unconditional, contextual and universal in the heritage of the late medieval humanism. Technologization paths and contexts for the interpretation of humanistic ideas in modern Russia are outlined. The paper determines the ways of harmonization of humanitarian values and the system of their social and legal legitimation. On the example of the educational policy of higher education in recent decades, achievements and failures in the process of forming a new value system are analyzed. This value system could be used as a basis for legislative practice and state policy that would allow determining the basis of modern bioethics, which is of great importance for the development of Russian society and further improvement of the moral and legal foundations of its existence.

1. Chesterton G. (2016) St. Francis of Assisi. Moscow: Direct Media (Russian translation).

2. Heidegger M. (1993) Time and Being: Articles and speeches. Moscow: Respublika (in Russian).

3. Ihde D. (1990)Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

4. Karpinskaya R.S. (1994) Global Evolutionism and Life Sciences. In: Global Evolutionism: A Philosophical Analysis. Moscow (in Russian).

5. Lamont C. (1998) The Philosophy of Humanism (8th ed.). Amherst, NY: Humanist Press.

6. Laza V.D. (2012) Religious Values under the Conditions of Social Transformations. Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2012. No. 9, pp. 24–27 (in Russian).

7. Losev A.F. (1978) Aesthetics of the Renaissance. Moscow: Mysl (in Russian).

8. Markov B.V. (2000) Nietzsche and Humanism. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 6. 2000. No. 3, pp. 3–12 (in Russian).

9. Przhilenskaya I.B. (2012) Transformation of the Social Life World of Russians: From Sealing and Colonization to Adaptation. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. 2012. No. 4, pp. 79–91 (in Russian).

10. Przhilenskaya I.B. (2016) The Life World and the Goals of Russian Students. Tsennosti i smysly = Values and meanings. 2016. No. 4, pp. 22–29 (in Russian).

11. Przhilensky V.I. (2014) Is Technical Science about Society Possible? Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. 2014. No. 10, pp. 9–19 (in Russian).

12. Przhilenskiy V.I. (2015) On the Modernization of Humanism. Dialogue and Universalism. 2015. No 2, pp. 133–143.

13. Przhilensky V.I., Ogorodnikov A.Yu. (2016) Axiological Foundations of Social Engineering: Prospects for the Phased Modernization of Modern Russian Society. Sotsis = Sociological Studies. 2016. No. 4, pp. 65–74 (in Russian).

14. Przhilensky V.I. & Przhilenskaya I.B. (2016) Theoretical knowledge in the structure and content of educational practices. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. 2016. No. 2, pp. 36–44 (in Russian).

15. Sergodeeva E.A. & Monastyrskaya N.I. (2017) Individualization vs Massivization: The Paradoxes of Modern Society. Society: Philosophy, History, Culture. 2017. No. 8, pp. 22–25 (in Russian).

16. Shapovalov V.A. & Przhilensky V.I. (2009) Two Cultures of Knowledge in the History of Science and Society: Ontological Prerequisites and Methodological Consequences. Issues of the History of Natural Science and Technology. Vol. 30. No. 1, pp. 3–16 (in Russian).

17. Sidorenko L.I. (2005) Methodological Measurement of the Ethos of PostNon-Classical Biological Research. In: Philosophy of Science. Issue 11: Ethos of science at the turn of the century (pp. 280–288). Moscow: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russian).

18. Tajsina E.A. (2004) Boethius’ Commentary on Porphyry and Its Role in the History of Logic and Philosophy. Bulletin of the Kazan State Pedagogical University. 2004. No. 3, pp. 52–60 (in Russian).

19. Tajsina E.A. (2008) Two models of Humanitarization of Education on the Example of Kazan State Energy University. Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology. 2008. No. 4, pp. 111–115 (in Russian).

20. Tajsina E.A. (2012) A Language is Never Neutral. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Series: Humanities. Vol. 154. No. 6, pp. 131–142 (in Russian).

21. Tishchenko P.S. (2018) Designing a Person as a Humanistic Project of the Modern Era. Science and Innovations. Vol. 4. No. 183, pp. 16–21 (in Russian).

22. Tulchinsky G.L. (2010) Shift of the Humanitarian Paradigm, Transcendental Subject and Posthuman Personology. Metodologiya i istoriya psi-khologii = Methodology and History of Psychology. Vol. 5. Issue 1, pp. 32–52 (in Russian).

23. Zenkin S. (1998) Afterword of the Translator. In: Deleuze J., Guattari F. What is philosophy? (pp. 281–286). Moscow: Institute of Experimental Sociology Publ., Saint Petersburg: Aletheia.