Digitized Нumanism

The humanitarian thought did not encounter such challenges that we face today. Biotechnologies outline the perspectives of “posthuman” personology, while digitalization and robotization of almost all spheres of social practice bring to the fore the idea of homodicy – justifying the need for human existence. The article analyzes four blocks of challenges to humanitarian knowledge: (1) achievements in medicine, prosthetics, transplantology and genetic engineering, which outlined the separation of a sentient subject from traditional anthropomorphism (“posthuman” personology); (2) studies of the brain neurophysiology, which advanced new arguments against free will; (3) costs of ill-considered propaganda of human rights; (4) digitization of almost all socio-cultural practices – from economics and military affairs to the formation and functioning of authority. Digitalization permeates all these “problematization fields,” setting their common conceptual and technological platform. In this regard, the question arises of the humanitarian expertise of modern technologies and the projects of education, communication and management, which implemented with their help. That expertise deals with not only the consequences, progress or even the possibility of implementing such projects, but also with their necessity. The focus and criteria of such expertise are important. Obviously, it cannot be directed only at the preservation of the biological species of homo sapiens and the conditions of its survival. Paradoxical choice arises in a situation where freedom and free will are questioned: which is more important – homo or sapiens? It is time for a clear distinction between the concepts of humanism and humanitarianism, including in the latter the posthuman personology. If humanitarianism is a personology of free spirit, then humanism seems to have a place next to economism and nationalism as forms of confined humanitarianism. This wide range of problems requires comprehension not only of their content but also of the methodology of the humanities and of the prospects of the humanities in modern society.

1. Bakhtin M.M. (1986) On the Philosophy of the Act. In: Philosophy and Sociology of Science and Technology. Yearbook. 1984–1985 (pp. 80–160). Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).

2. Haggard P. (2008) Human Volition: Towards a Neuroscience of Will. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. Vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 934–946.

3. Inglehart R.F. (2018) Cultural Evolution. Moscow: Mysl (in Russian).

4. Kane R. (2016) Postupat’ “po sobstvennoj vole”: sovremennye razmyshlenija o drevnej filosifskoj problem [Acting “on One’s Own Will”: Modern Reflections on an Ancient Philosophical Problem]. Logos. Vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 105–130 (in Russian)

5. Libet B. (1985) Unconscious Cerebral Initiative and the Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary Action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 529–566.

6. Mishura A. (2016) Pole bitvy: svoboda voli [Battlefield: Free Will]. Logos. Vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 53–54 (in Russian)

7. Olson M. Jr. (1971) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

8. Pereboom D. (2001) Living Without Free Will. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

9. Smilansky S. (2000) Free Will and Illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

10. Spinoza B. (2012) Ethics. Moscow: Azbuka-Attikus (in Russian)

11. Trevena J. & Miller J. (2009) Brain Preparation before a Voluntary Action: Evidence against Unconscious Movement Initiation. Consciousness and Cognition. Vol. 19, no.1, pp. 447–456.

12. Tulchinskii G.L. (2006) O prirode svobody [On the Nature of Freedom]. Voprosy filosofii. 2006. No. 4, pp. 19–28 (in Russian).

13. Tulchinskii G. (2017) Objasnenie v politicheskoj nauke: konstruktivism vs. positivism [Explanation in the Political Science: Constructivism vs. Positivism]. Publichnaja politika. 2017. No. 1, pp. 76–98.

14. Vygotsky L.S. (1999) Thought and Speech. Moscow: Labirint (in Russian)

15. Wegner D. (2002) The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.