Humanitarian Rationality and the Possibilities of Rational Humanism
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2018-11-55-69
Abstract
The article discusses the relations between humanism and humanitarianism through the prism of rationality, which allows to identify the significant contradictions between their essences and methods of implementation as well as to reveal the subtleties and differences in the relationship between them. The author demonstrates the interrelation of the idea of rationality as reasonability with the theory of humanism and its practices; it is shown that the charges of inhumanity against rationality can be addressed mainly to instrumental reasonability, which occupies a dominant position in the society of Modernity. The inconsistency of the development of humanism in recent years is examined. On the one hand, first organizationally formed humanistic movements emerged in the 20th century and humanism gradually became a common social practice. On the other hand, starting from the second half of the 20th century, representatives of the postmodern and religious-conservative traditions more and more clearly pronounce statements about the crisis of humanistic ideology. It is determined that the classical concept of secular humanism has lost its representativeness to social realities because its model of a person becomes outdated and requires rethinking and renewal. It is emphasized that the role of humanitarian technologies is increasing under the new conditions of the science functioning in modern society, in which any knowledge, including natural and technical, acquires a humanitarian dimension. Therefore, the humanitarian component is a necessary part of any science today since the humanitarian component offers a pragmatical and axiological comparison of the scientific achievements with the life-world of men and their needs. The author concludes that rational strategies for overcoming the crisis of humanism (transhumanism and posthumanism) are associated with new ontologies and represent attempts to understand the transformations of humanistic values in the technoscientific world.
Keywords
About the Author
E. A. SergodeevaRussian Federation
Elena Sergodeeva – D.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor at the Department of Philosophy
References
1. Belyaeva L.N. (2008) Humanitarian Technologies and the Humanities in the Aspect of Training a Modern Specialist. Bulletin of Herzen University. 2008. No. 1 (51) (in Russian).
2. Cherny Yu.Yu. (2003) Modern Humanism. In: Philosophy in the twentieth century. In 2 parts: Collection of Reviews and Abstracts of the INION RAS. Vol. 2. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information in Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russian).
3. Foucault M. (1996) The Will to the Truth: Beyond Power, Knowledge, and Sexuality. Works of different years. Moscow: Kastal (Russian translation).
4. Fuller S. (2011) Humanity 2.0: What It Means to Be Human Past, Present and Future. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Maсmillan.
5. Guardini R. (1990) The End of the Modern World. Voprosy filosofii. 1990. No. 4 (Russian translation).
6. Haraway D. (1985) A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology a Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review. Issue 80.
7. Knyazeva E.N. (2011) Transdisciplinary Research Strategies. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2011. No. 10 (112) (in Russian).
8. Kurtz P. (2000) The Courage to Become: The Virtues of Humanism. Moscow: Russian Humanist Society (Russian translation).
9. Kuvakin V. (2002) Modern humanism. Higher education in Russia. 2002. No. 4 (in Russian).
10. Latour B. (1998) From the World of Science to That of Research? Science Magazine. Vol. 280, no. 5361.
11. Lyotard J.-F. (1998) The Postmodern Condition. Moscow: Institute of Experimental Sociology; St. Petersburg: Aletheia (Russian translation).
12. Markov B.V. (2000) F. Nietzsche and Humanism. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Series 6: Philosophy, Political Science, Sociology, Psychology, Law. 2000. No. 3 (in Russian).
13. Marcuse H. (2011) Critical Theory of Society. Moscow: AST; Astrel (Russian translation).
14. Przhilenskiy V.I. (2009) Identity: To Gain, Choose or Design? Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. 2009. No. 10 (in Russian).
15. Przhilenskiy V.I. (2014) Social Technologies and Humanistic Values: Pro et Contra. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. 2014. No. 10 (in Russian).
16. Sergodeeva E.A. (2013) Suspicion as a Phenomenon of Modern Culture. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. 2013. No. 6 (in Russian).
17. Sergodeeva E.A., Monastyrskaya N.I. (2017) Individualization vs Massification: The Paradoxes of Modern Society. Society: Philosophy, History, Culture. 2017. No. 8 (in Russian).
18. Tulchinskii G.L. (2008) Humanitarian Examination as a Social Technology. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Academy of Culture and Arts. Vol. 16, no. 4 (in Russian).
19. Tulchinskii G.L. (2015) The Humanities: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow (Materials of the Round Table). Chelovek. 2015. No. 2 (in Russian).
20. Yakovleva E.L. (2013) Humanism – Posthumanism – Transhumanism – Technohumanism… What is next? In: Humanism and Modernity: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Educational Conference (November 8–9, 2013). Kazan: Kazan University (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Sergodeeva E.A. Humanitarian Rationality and the Possibilities of Rational Humanism. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2018;(11):55-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2018-11-55-69