“The Revolution of Relativity” and Self-Consciousness in the History of Philosophy of the 20th Century

This paper discusses the development of self-consciousness in the history of philosophy of the 20th century compared with the same development in the natural sciences. The author characterizes this stage of philosophical historiography as the “revolution of relativity.” This movement of self-consciousness was apparent in not only the humanities but also the natural sciences at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. Awareness of probability is a fundamental achievement of non-classic physics, which has since reversed its paradigm. In contrast to the Newtonian scheme, quantum theory introduces the category of probability and insists that we can talk about certain physical phenomena only in a probabilistic mode and that the method of observation affects the phenomena observed. Consequently, any “object-subject” and “subject-subject” interaction involves the experience of the researcher, which thereby affects the results. The same model of interpretation lies at the basis of the turn toward self-consciousness in the history of philosophy of the 20th century. The classical history of philosophy is built on idealization and gives an objective description of the philosophical process. Following the other sciences, the philosophy of the 20th century understood that historical and philosophical reality largely depends on the historians of philosophy; that such reality is constructed by certain means; that there is a certain kind of historical and philosophical work; and that, with different strategies, methods and approaches, we obtain different results that are complementary to each other. The 20th century was a time of competing interpretations rather than gradually progressing historical and philosophical systems. This stimulated the search for own ideal of objectivity. For philosophical historiography, this is the hermeneutic ideal of the structural analysis of text or architectonic reconstruction. The historicalphilosophical revolution of relativity promotes the development of critical historiography and revises the foundations of its classical tradition.

1. Ayer A.J. (1982) Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. London: Weiden- feld and Nicolson.

2. Betti E. (2011) Hermeneutics as the General Methodology of the Gei- steswissenschaften. Moscow: Kanon + (Russian translation).

3. Blauberg I.I. (2008) E. Brehier and M. Gueroult: Two Approaches to History of Philosophy. Istoria Filosofii = History of Philosophy. Vol. 13, pp. 69–88 (in Russian).

4. Bohr N. (1961) Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. Moscow: Foreign Literature Pub. (Russian translation).

5. Bréhier E. (1938) Histoire de la philosophie. T. I. L’antiquité et la moyen age. Paris: Félix Alcan.

6. Bréhier E. (2012) Comment je comprends l’histoire de la philosophie. La philosophie de Plotin (pp. 277–288). St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal (Russian translation).

7. Copleston F. (2003) History of Philosophy. Vol. 1: Greece and Rome. Moscow: Tsentrpolygraph (Russian translation).

8. Dzhokhadze I.D. (2012) Richard Rorty as Historian of Philosophy. Istoria Filosofii = History of Philosophy. Vol. 17, pp. 3–24 (in Russian).

9. Frasca-Spada M. (1996) Notes on Intellectual History, History of Philosophy, and History of Ideas. Intellectual News. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 30‒31. doi: 10.1080/15615324.1996.10432169

10. Frede M. (1988) The History of Philosophy as a Discipline. The Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 666‒672. doi: 10.5840/jphil1988851114

11. Gadamer H.-G. (1988) Truth and Method. Moscow: Progress (Russian translation).

12. Gueroult M. (1969) The History of Philosophy as A Philosophical Problem. The Monist. Vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 563‒587. doi: 10.5840/monist196953438

13. Heidegger M. (2012) Parmenides. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal (Russian translation).

14. Heidegger M. (2015) Hegel. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal (Russian translation).

15. Heisenberg W. (1989) Physics and Philosophy. The Revolution in Modern Science. Moscow: Nauka (Russian translation).

16. Hutton S. (2014) Intellectual History and the History of Philosophy. History of European Ideas. Vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 925‒937. doi: 10.1080/01916599.2014.882054

17. Kelley D.R. (1996) What is Happening to the History of Ideas? Intellectual News. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 36‒50. doi: 10.2307/2709744

18. Krotov A.A. (2018) Philosophy of History of Philosophy in France (Problem of Regularities in the Development of Intellectual Culture). Moscow: Moscow University Pub. (in Russian).

19. Makkreel R.A. (1990) Traditional Historicism, Contemporary Interpretations of Historicity, and the History of Philosophy. New Literary History. Vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 977‒991. doi: 10.2307/469195

20. Mandelbaum M. (1965) The History of Ideas, Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy. History and Theory. Vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 33‒66. doi: 10.2307/2504118

21. Mash R. (1987) How Important for Philosophers is the History of Philosophy? History and Theory. Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 287‒299. doi: 10.2307/2505064

22. Morgan M.L. (1987) The Goals and Methods of the History of Philosophy. The Review of Metaphysics. Vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 717‒732.

23. Normore C.G. (2006) What is to be Done in the History of Philosophy. Topoi. Vol. 25, pp. 75–82. doi: 10.1007/s11245-006-0012-3

24. Popkin R. (1985) Philosophy and the History of Philosophy. The Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 625‒632. doi: 10.2307/2026418

25. Puntel L. (1991) The History of Philosophy in Contemporary Philosophy: The View from Germany. Topoi. Vol. 10, pp. 147‒153. doi: 10.1007/BF00141335

26. Ricœur P. (1995) Conflict of Interpretations. Essays in Hermeneutics. Moscow: Academia-Center; Medium (Russian translation).

27. Rorty R. (2017) Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres. Moscow: Kanon +; ROOI Rehabilitation (Russian translation).

28. Schmitz K.L. (1988) The History of Philosophy as Actual Philosophy. The Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 673‒674. doi: 10.5840/jphil1988851115

29. Schneider U.J. (1996) Intellectual History and the History of Philosophy. Intellectual News. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28‒30. doi: 10.1080/15615324.1996.10432168

30. Vlasova O.A. (2018) Karl Jaspers: The Philosopher’s Way. St. Peters- burg: Vladimir Dal (in Russian).

31. Yolton J.W. (1986) Is There a History of Philosophy? Some Difficulties and Suggestions. Synthese. Vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 3‒21. doi: 10.1007/BF00485506

32. Zotov A.F. (2014) The History of Philosophy and The Challenges of the 21st Century. In: Motroshilova N.V. (Ed.) History of Philosophy: Challenges of the 21st Century (pp. 331–340). Moscow: Kanon +; ROOI Rehabilitation (in Russian).