Language, Being, History in Jacob Boehme’s Theosophy

The aim of the research is to elucidate the key notions of the German mystic thinker Jacob Boehme’s linguistic-philosophical theory: language of Nature (Natursprache), Adamic language and sensual language in regard to each other and to post-Babel historical languages of humankind. This theory is considered in a dual context of the Late Renaissance “Adamicist” studies and of Boehme’s theosophical project as a whole. Since a considerable part of his work had a form of an extensive commentary on Genesis, Boehme’s interpretations of the biblical stories are devoted to linguistic topics. Explaining the stories concerning Babel (Gen. 11), the theosophist gives some considerations to the essence of historic transformation and loss of the primordial language. Based on the story of Adam’s naming of the animals (Gen. 2:19–20), Boehme formulates his views on the substance of Natural and Adamic languages. It is argued that, according to the theosophist, the rise of polyglottism, caused by Babel catastrophe, was a culmination of spiritual disorientation of humankind. Having started from the Fall, that process led to a fundamental distortion of ideas about being and the Deity. Due to this, people decided to look for Him in a reified form by technical means. A cognitive and linguistic aspect of that disorientation consisted in alienating of still single primordial language from Natursprache as its ontological foundation. Boehme thought that this alienation mainly caused rapid development of linguistic pluralism. Meanwhile, the language of Nature was a unique “guide,” which made possible for Adam to create his epistemically perfect language, and his descendants could keep its understanding for some time.

1. Boehme J. (2013) Aurora (Morgen Röte im auffgang, 1612) and Fun- damental Report (Gründlicher Bericht, Mysterium Pansophicum, 1620). (A. Weeks & G. Bonheim, Eds.). Leiden, Boston: Brill.

2. Bӧhme J. (1682) Clavis, oder Schlüssel etlicher vornehmen Puncten und Wörter […]. Amsterdam.

3. Bӧhme J. (1841) Jakob Bӧhme’s Sӓmmtliche Werke. Bd. III. Leipzig: J.A. Barth.

4. Bӧhme J. (1842) Jakob Bӧhme’s Sӓmmtliche Werke. Bd. IV. Leipzig: J.A. Barth.

5. Bӧhme J. (1843) Jakob Bӧhme’s Sӓmmtliche Werke. Bd. V. Leipzig: J.A. Barth.

6. Eco U. (1995) The Search for the Perfect Language (Fentress J., Trans). Oxford: Blackwell.

7. Haferland H. (1989) Mystische Theorie der Sprache bei Jacob Böhme. In: Gessinger J. & von Rahden W. (Eds.) Theorien vom Ursprung der Sprache (Vol. 2, pp. 89–130). Berlin: De Gruyter.

8. Harrison Р. (2002) Original Sin and the Problem of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe. Journal of the History of Ideas. Vol. 63. No. 2, 239–259.

9. Karabykov A. (2014) “So the Man Gave Names”: The Strategies of Reconstitution of the Adamic Language in Renaissance Culture. Chelovek = The Man. 2014. No. 5, pp. 114–131 (in Russian).

10. Metcalf G.J. (2013) On Language Diversity and Relationship from Bibliander to Adelung. (T. Van Hal & R. Van Rooy, Eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publ. Co.

11. O’Regan C. (2002) Gnostic Apocalypse: Jacob Boehme’s Haunted Narrative. Albany: State University of New York Press.

12. Vassányi M. (2011) Anima Mundi: The Rise of the World Soul Theory in Modern German Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.

13. Willard Th. (1989) Rosicrucian Sign Lore and the Origin of Language. In: J. Gessinger & W. von Rahden (Eds.) Theorien vom Ursprung der Sprache (Vol. 2, pp. 131–157). Berlin: De Gruyter.

14. Wolfson E.R. (2018) The Holy Cabala of Changes: Jacob Böhme and Jewish Esotericism. Aries – Journal for the Study of Western Esotericism. Vol. 18, pp. 21–53. doi: 10.1163/15700593-01801002