Ontological Constants of Russia as a Civilization-State in the Context of World History
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-1-29-47
Abstract
The article presents a theoretical, philosophical solution to a sharply debatable issue, discussed in Russian social and human sciences, about the nature of Russian statehood and about promising ways of further reforming the institutions of Russian government and management. Therefore, attention is drawn to the recent recognition of the long historical existence of two types of social organization of society, one of which is inherent in Western civilization, the other one is inherent in non-Western civilizations. The author considers the ways of theoretical combination of sociological developments about two types of societal organization of society with what has been done recently in modern cultural studies for the description and modeling of the cultural code of a local civilization. In the article, the introduction to the core of the socio-philosophical knowledge of the concepts of two types of society is based on the philosophical and historical analysis from the standpoint of world-system analysis of the development of human society. The article shows why for five centuries, world history did not and could not change the cultural code, the cultural matrix in non-Western civilizations, including in Russia, despite all the efforts of the West. It is also emphasized that such a situation cannot be explained by an appeal only to the low culture and ignorance of the Russian people, it is connected with the action of historical factors. The author, answering this question, analyzes facts of Russian and world history and reveals the latent logic of Russian history.
About the Author
V. N. ShevchenkoRussian Federation
Vladimir Shevchenko – D.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor, Honored Worker of Science of Russia, Main Researcher at the Department of the Philosophical Problems of Politics.
Moscow.
References
1. Chereshnev V.A. & Rastorguyev V.N. (Eds.) (2018) Civilization Development of Russia: Heritage, Potential, Prospects. Moscow: A.V. Vorobyev Pub. (in Russian).
2. Jaspers K. (1949) The Origin and Goal of History (Russian translation in: Jaspers K. The Meaning and Purpose of History. Moscow: Politizdat, 1991).
3. Kharin A.N. (2013) Models of Government Devices in the Context of Globalization: Scenarios for Russia. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
4. Kirdina S.G. (2014) Institutional Matrices and Development in Russia: an Introduction to X&Y Theory. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya (in Russian).
5. Martynov B.F (2015) “West” and “non-West”: Past, Present, Future. Moscow: Institute of Latin America of the Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russian).
6. Pain (2014) Xenophobia and Nationalism in the Age of Russian Timelessness. Pro et Contra. 2014. No. 1–2 (in Russian).
7. Panarin A.S. (2014) Orthodox Civilization. Moscow: Institute of Orthodox Civilization (in Russian).
8. Podvoysky D.G. (2013) Paths of Modernity: Sociological Variations on the Topic. Sociologicheskie Issledovanii (SOCIS). 2013. No. 10. P. 3–13 (in Russian).
9. Rastorguyev V.N. (2018a) Russian Civilizational Identity. In: Chereshnev V.A. & Rastorguyev V.N. (Eds.) Civilization Development of Russia: Heritage, Potential, Prospects. Moscow: A.V. Vorobyev Pub. (in Russian).
10. Rastorguyev V.N. (2018b) Russian as a Civilization-State. In: Chereshnev V.A. & Rastorguyev V.N. (Eds.) Civilization Development of Russia: Heritage, Potential, Prospects. Moscow: A.V. Vorobyev Pub. (in Russian).
11. Rogov I.I. (2017) The Theory of Imperology. Moscow: Knizhny Mir (in Russian).
12. Shevchenko V.N. (2013) External Factor and the Development of Russian Society. In: Dynamics of the Interaction of Internal and External Factors and the Vector of Development of Russian Society (pp. 8–66). Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russian).
13. Spiridonov V.I. (2016) “Civilization-State” as an Option in the Search for Self-Identification of Modern Russian Society. In: Spiridonova V.I., Sokolova R.I., & Shevchenko V.N. Russia as a Civilization-State: philosophical and political analysis (pp. 31–40). Moscow (in Russian).
14. Terin V.F. (2003) The West and the East in the Institutional Approach to Civilization. Retrieved on December 2, 2018, from http://mirznanii.com/a/227260/zapad-i-vostok-v-institutsionalnom-podkhode-k-tsivilizatsii (in Russian).
15. Tsymbursky V.L. (1995) Cycles of the “Abduction of Europe” In: Other. Readings New Russian Identity. Vol. 2: Russia as a Subject. Moscow: Argus (in Russian).
16. Tsymbursky V.L. (2001) Geopolitical Identity. In: New Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In 4 vols. (Vol. 2). Moscow: Mysl (in Russian).
17. Yakovenko I.G. (2009) Theoretical Bases of the Civilization Analysis of Russia. In: Dmitiriev A.P. (Ed.) In Search of the Theory of the Russian Civilization. Moscow: Novy Khronograf (in Russian).
18. Yasin U. (2007) Phantom Pains of a Bygone Empire. In: Klyamkin A.P. (Ed.) After Empire. Moscow: Liberalnaya Missiya (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Shevchenko V.N. Ontological Constants of Russia as a Civilization-State in the Context of World History. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2019;62(1):29-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-1-29-47