Existential Anthropology after Varlam Shalamov
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-3-7-24
Abstract
In article it is shown that the philosophical anthropology undergoes the radical conceptual shift caused by the tragic experience of the 20th century. The existential anthropology envisages a special type of communication in “boundary situations” (K. Jaspers) when people reveal themselves in their “authenticity” and the routine forms of adaptation to reality are depreciated. The “existential communication” demonstrates the essence of a person as the center of reasonable, healthy, and good will to life. However, the “philosophical belief” in such essence is called into question if the living conditions in a “boundary situation” go beyond the limits of humanity. The conditions of “terrestrial hell,” described by Varlam Shalamov in Kolyma Stories, are of that kind. The experience of the Kolyma penal servitude, interpreted through Shalamov’s art perception, showed that the philosophical anthropology is false and trustless if its concepts are built on the base of apriorism or are brought to the sphere of the transcendental. The philosophical anthropology in Shalamov’s “camp prose” is not an abstract conceptual design but a part and continuation of a vital context, from which the vital destiny of the writer cannot be separated. In the ontological bases of this philosophy, there is no place for eternal and invariable “human essence,” elevating the personality to the top of being hierarchy. The “Kolyma hell” does not divide existence and essence of the personality and does not oppose them, it establishes between them a special connection. The essence reveals itself just when the hell devastates it. The essence meets the reality at the last boundary of resistance to hell. Shalamov’s anthropology places reflection on the personality inside a “boundary situation” but notabove it. If this experience is acquired, the philosophical anthropology will not be the same as before. The reality of terrestrial hell will be its touchstone.
Keywords
About the Author
V. N. PorusRussian Federation
Vladimir Porus – D.Sc. in Philosophy, Head of the School of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities
Moscow
References
1. Adorno T. (1966) Negative Dialektik (Russian translation: Moscow: Nauchny mir, 2003).
2. Alanovich F. (2002) Descent into Hell (An Image of the Trinity in the Kolyma Stories). In: Yesipov V.V. (Comp.) Shalamov Collection. Issue 3 (pp. 129–143). Vologda: Grifon (in Russian).
3. Arendt H. (1951) The Origins of Totalitarianism (Russian translation: Moscow: TsentrKom, 1996).
4. Arendt H. (1963) Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (Russian translation: Moscow: Europa, 2008).
5. Buber M. (1948) Das Problem des Menschen (Russian translation in: Buber M. Two images of Belief(pp. 157–232). Moscow: Republic, 1995).
6. Dostoyevsky F.M. (1984) The Complete Collected Works in 30 Volumes. Vol. 27. Leningrad: Nauka (in Russian).
7. Geller M. (1994) Last Hope. In: Yesipov V.V. (Comp.) Shalamov Collection. Issue 1 (pp. 216–223).Vologda: Griffin (in Russian).
8. Ishchenko E.N. (2017) Shalamov’s “Boundlessness of Evil” and H. Arendt’s “Banality of Evil”: Art and Philosophical Meanings of Evidence. In: Shalamov’s Train. Problems of the Russian Consciousness: V.T. Shalamov’s Destiny and Worldviev (On the 110 Anniversary of Birth) (pp. 68–77). Moscow – Vologda, June 15–18, 2017. Moscow: Golos (in Russian).
9. Jaspers K. (1923) Idee der Universität. Berlin: Julius Springer (Russian translation: Minsk, BSU, 2006).
10. Jaspers K. (1932) Die geistige Situation der Zeit. Вerlin: De Gruyter. Jaspers K. (1951) Einführung in die Philosophie (Russian translation: Propilei, 2000).
11. Jaspers K. (1977) Philosophische Autobiographie (Russian translation in: Pertsev A.V. (Ed.) Western Philosophy. The Results of the Millennium (pp. 19–152). Yekaterinburg: Dellovaya kniga; Bishkek: Odyssey, 1997).
12. Jaspers K. (1948) Der philosophische Glaube (Russian translation in: Jaspers K. The Sense and Purpose of History (pp. 420–508). Moscow: Politizdat, 1991).
13. Pertsev A.V. (2012) Young Jaspers: The Birth of Existentialism from the Foam of Psychiatry. Saint Petersburg: RKhGA Pub. (in Russian).
14. Sarnov B. (1993) Coming of the Captain Lebyadkin. Zoshchenko’s Case.Moscow: Kultura (in Russian).
15. Shalamov V.T. (2004) New Book: Memoirs. Notebooks. Correspondence. Investigative Affairs. Moscow: Eksmo (in Russian).
16. Shalamov V.T. (2013) Collected Works in 6 Volumes. Moscow: Knigovek (in Russian).
17. Shreyder Y.A. (2002) Varlam Shalamov’s Spiritual Mystery. In: Yesipov V.V. (Comp.) Shalamov Collection. Issue 1 (pp. 61–70). Vologda: Grifon (in Russian).
18. Volkova E.V. (1996) Paradoxes of a Catharsis of Varlam Shalamov. Voprosy filosofii. 1996. No. 11. P. 43–56 (in Russian).
19. Volkova E.V. (1998) Tragic paradox of Varlam Shalamov. Moscow: Respublika (in Russian).
20. Wittgenstein L. (1967) Bemerkungen über Frazers “The Golden Bough” (Russian translation in:Historico-Philosophical Year-Book ’89 (pp. 251– 268). Moscow: Nauka, 1989).
Review
For citations:
Porus V.N. Existential Anthropology after Varlam Shalamov. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2019;62(3):7-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-3-7-24