The Creators Aspiring for the Future of Mankind: N.N. Moiseev and V.S. Stepin
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-4-63-75
Abstract
The article discusses the affinity of the ideas of two prominent Russian scholars N.N. Moiseev and V.S. Stepin. This affinity of their ideas is above all expressed in the global scale of their thinking, in their orientation toward the search for the ways of mankind development. Both thinkers sought a way out of the limitations and crisis of technological civilization through the promotion of basic values of harmony in the evolution of society and the biosphere. They made an enormous contribution to the development of both humanitarian and natural sciences areas of knowledge related to social management and development, techonology, economics, law, medicine, ecology, education, etc. They worked in an interdisciplinary areas and were successful integrators of natural science and humanities. Simultaneously with the scientific work, Moiseev and Stepin were excellent teachers and mentors of both young and mature researchers. They have created successful scientific schools that include many dozens of outstanding scientists. They devoted much attention and much time to social work, primarily in various structures of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The affinity of Moiseev’s and Stepin’s ideas is shown in four areas of their activities: overcoming the crisis of technological civilization and the limitations of the concept of sustainable development, research into socio-humanitarian cybernetics, development of advanced education models, implementation of successful scientific diplomacy projects. The author of this article participated in joint research projects with Moiseev and Stepin, the personal communication with them and their ideas significantly influenced author’s life path, interests and research results.
About the Author
V. E. LepskiyRussian Federation
Vladimir Lepskiy – D.Sc. in Psychology, Professor, Main Research Fellow
Moscow
References
1. Lévi-Strauss C. (1950) Préface. In: Berndt C.H. Women’s Changing Ceremonies in Northern Australia (pp. 3–8). Paris: Hermann (in French).
2. Lepskiy V.E. (2018a) Evolution of Cybernetics: Philosophical and Methodological Analysis. Kybernetes, Vol. 47, no, 2, pp. 249–261.
3. Lepskiy V.E. (2018b) Philosophical-Methodological Basis for the Formation of Third-Order Cybernetics. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. 2018. No. 10, pp. 7–36.
4. Moiseev N.N. (1996) Ecology and Education. Moscow: YUNISAM (in Russian).
5. Moiseev N.N. (2001) Universum. Information. Society. Moscow: Ustoychivyy mir (in Russian).
6. Moiseev N.N., Aleksandrov V.V., & Tarko A.M. (1985) Man and the Biosphere: An Experience of System Analysis and Experiments with Models. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
7. Scientific Diplomacy or Technological Confrontation? (2018, January 3) Interfax. Retrieved from: http://www.interfax.ru/russia/594072 (in Russian).
8. Stepin V.S. (2003) Theoretical Knowledge. Moscow: Progress-Tradicia (in Russian).
9. Stepin V.S. (2017) 21st Century: A Radical Transformation of the Type of Civilizational Development. In:Global World: Systemic Shifts, Challenges and Contours of the Future: 27 th International Likhachev Scientific Readings, May 18–20, 2017 (pp. 185–188). Saint Petersburg: SPbGUP (in Russian).
10. Stepin V.S. (2018) Social Systems and Methodology for Forecasting Their Future States. In: Contours of the Future in the Context of World Cultural Development: 28th International Likhachev Scientific Readings, May 17–19, 2018 (pp. 178–181). Saint Petersburg: SPbGUP (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Lepskiy V.E. The Creators Aspiring for the Future of Mankind: N.N. Moiseev and V.S. Stepin. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2019;62(4):63-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-4-63-75