The Idea of the Posthuman: A Comparative Analysis of Transhumanism and Posthumanism

The article discusses the modern philosophical concepts of transhumanism and posthumanism. The central issue of these concepts is “What is the posthuman?” The 21st century is marked by a contradictory understanding of the role and status of the human. On the one hand, there comes the realization of human hegemony over the whole world around: in the 20th century mankind not only began to conquer outer space, invented nuclear weapons, made many amazing discoveries but also shifted its attention to itself or rather to the modification of itself. Transhumanist projects aim to strengthen human influence by transforming human beings into other, more powerful and viable forms of being. Such projects continues the project of human “deification.” On the other hand, acknowledging the onset of the new geological epoch of the Anthropocene, there comes the rejection of classical interpretations of the human. The categories of historicity, sociality and subjectivity are no longer so anthropocentric. In the opinion of the posthumanists, the project of the Vitruvian man has proven to be untenable in the present-day environment and is increasingly criticized. The reflection on the phenomenon of the human and his future refers to the concepts that explore not only human but also non-human. Very often we can find a synonymous understanding of transhumanism and posthumanism. Although these movements work with the same modern constructs and concepts but interpret them in a fundamentally different way. The discourse of transhumanism refers to the Cartesian opposition of the body and the mind. Despite the sacralization of technology and the desire to purify the posthuman from such seemingly permanent attributes of the living as aging and death, transhumanism in many ways continues the ideas of the Enlightenment. For posthumanists, the subject is nomadic and a kind of assembly of human, animal, digital, chimerical. Thus, in posthumanism the main maxim of humanism about the human as the highest value is rejected – the human ceases to be “the measure of all things.”

1. Alekseev A.Y. (2017) Turing Test: 66 Years later. In: The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 154–188). Moscow: IIntell (in Russian).

2. Bostrom N. (2005) A History of Transhumanist Thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–25. Retrieved from https://nickbostrom.com/papers/history.pdf

3. Braidotti R. (2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

4. Budanov V.G. (2013) Quantum Synergetic Anthropology and the Problems of Artificial Intelligence and Transhumanism. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. 2013. No. 9. pp. 25–37 (in Russian).

5. Chizhevsky A.L. (1986) The Theory of the Space Eras. In: Tsiolkovsky K.E. Dreams of Earth and Space. Tula: Priokskoe Pub. (in Russian).

6. Clynes M.E. & Kline N.S. (1960) Cyborgs and Space. Astronautics. September 1960, pp. 26–27, 74–76. Retrieved from https://scribd.com/doc/2962194/Cyborgs-and-Space-Clynes-Kline

7. Descola F. (2013) Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

8. Ettinger R. (1962) The Prospect of Immortality (Russian translation: Moscow: Nauchniy mir, 2003).

9. Ferrando F. (2013) Posthumanism, Transhumanism, Antihumanism, Metahumanism, and New Materialisms: Differences and Relations. Existenz: An International Journal in Philosophy, Religion, Politics, and the Arts.Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 26–32. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304333989_Posthumanism_Transhumanism_Antihumanism_Metahumanism_and_New_Materialisms_Differences_and_Relations

10. Foucault M. (1970) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock.

11. Fukuyama F. (2002) Our Posthuman Future.New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

12. Fukuyama F. (2009, October 23) Transhumanism. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/23/transhumanism/

13. Girenok F.I. (2016) What is the Human? Filosofiya khozyaystva. 2016. No. 6, pp. 165–174 (in Russian).

14. Girenok F.I. (2018) The Basic Principles of Digital Philosophy. Filosofiya khozyaystva. 2018. No. 6, pp. 133–139 (in Russian).

15. Haraway D. (2008) When Species Meet.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

16. Haraway D. (2017) A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth. In: Haraway D. Simians, Cyborgs and Women(pp. 149–181). New York: Routledge.

17. Margulis L. & Sagan D. (2001) Marvellous Microbes. Resurgence. Issue 206, pp. 10–12.

18. Nikitina E. (2017) Toward Trans-Meta-Posthumanism. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/36494476 (in Russian)

19. Popper K. (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.

20. Ranisch R. & Sorgner S.L. (2015) Introducing Post- and Transhumanism. In: Ranisch R. & Sorgner S.L. (Eds.) Post- and Transhumanism: An Introduction (pp. 7–28). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

21. Romanenko Y.M. (2017) Philosophy of Communication. Theoretical and Methodological Aspects. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State Polytechnic University Press (in Russian).

22. Rostova N.N. (2017) The Expulsion of God. The Problem of the Sacred in Philosophical Anthropology. Moscow: Prospekt (in Russian).