Ideological Prolegomena of the Soviet-Russian Activity Theory

The article examines the system-methodological and conceptual foundations of the psychological activity theory that arose in the Soviet Union under the influence of the ideology of Marxism-Leninism. The author demonstrates the process of incorporation of Marxism-Leninism dogmas into the canonical form of the activity theory as a scientific knowledge that does not need any scientific confirmation. The pseudoscientific discourse that arose at the same time served to strengthen the position of the ideologists of the bureaucratic system, who found “objective confirmations” of the truth of Marx’s teachings in the data of psychological science. The scientific community, subjected to ideological transformation, tried to defend itself from the destructive influence of ideology, giving rise to special forms of relations in the scientific and psychological environment, which led to the struggle and confrontation of scientific schools and groups. As a result of ideological expansion, psychological knowledge has become to some extent a tool for the bureaucratic system to overpower scientific dissent. That was clearly manifested in the discussion on the results of the Zagorsk experiment, in which an incorrect, partially falsified, attempt was made to prove the development of the human psyche of children born deaf and blind. The influence of ideology can also be traced in the confrontation of scientific schools in physics, genetics, biology and physiology. The article discusses prospects and new trends in the development of the activity theory after exclusion of the ideological concepts of Soviet socialism from its systemconceptual foundations. We observe the formation of new psychological concepts that reflect non-classical and post-non-classical forms of scientific rationality. Attempts are made to create and study the models of the psyche developed within the framework of the theory of organized complexity and the concepts of autopoietic self-organization and evolution.

1. Alexandrov V.Y. (1992) Difficult Years of Soviet Biology. Saint Peters-burg: Nauka (in Russian).

2. Arshinov V.I. & Budanov V.G. (2018) The Concept of the Network in the Optics of the Synergetic Paradigm of Complexity. Voprosy filosofii. 2018. No. 3, pp. 49–58 (in Russian).

3. Asmolov A.G. (1997) On the Verge of Non-Classical Psychology. Siberian Journal of Psychology. 1997. No. 7, pp. 24–39 (in Russian).

4. Bratus B.S. (2013) The “Word” and the “Deed»: On the history of Scientific Relations between A.N. Leontiev and L.S. Vygotsky. National Psychological Journal. 2013. No. 1, pp. 18–24 (in Russian).

5. Dubrovsky D.I. (1994) Psyche and Brain: Results and Prospects of Research. In: Dubrovsky D.I. (Ed.) Brain and Mind. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).

6. Dubrovsky D.I. (Ed.) (2013) Global Future 2045. Convergent Technologies (NBICS) and Transhumanism Evolution. Moscow: Moscow Pub. (in Russian).

7. Dubrovsky D.I. (2018) The Phenomenon of Deafblindness. Once Again about the Zagorsk Experiment (On the facts of falsification, its defenders and on the actualization of the problem). Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. 2018. No. 1, pp. 89–117 (in Russian).

8. Engels F. (1976) Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 21, pp. 269–317). Moscow: Politizdat (Russian translation).

9. Ilyenkov E.V. (2009) Dialectics of the Ideal. Logos. 2009. No. 1, pp. 6–62 (in Russian).

10. Ivannikov V.A. (1999) A.N. Leontiev through the Eyes of a Student and an Employee. Mir psikhologii. 1999. No. 1, pp.11 (in Russian).

11. Jones P. (2009) Ilyenkov and Methodological Problems of Modern “Theory of Activity.” Logos. 2009. No.1, pp. 133–150 (in Russian).

12. Knyazeva H.N. (2006) Epistemological Constructivism. In: Philosophy of Science. Issue 12: Phenomenon of Consciousness (pp. 133–152). Moscow: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences Pub. (in Russian).

13. Knyazeva H.N. (2015) Universal Evolutionism: Patterns Which Connect. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. 2015. No. 3, pp. 90–103 (in Russian).

14. Lektorsky V.A. & Garai L. (2015) The Theories of Activity: A Dialogue about How Successful They Were and What They Lack. Voprosy filosofii. 2015. No. 2, pp. 25–37 (in Russian).

15. Leontiev A.N. (1975) Activity, Consciousness, Personality. Moscow: Politizdat (in Russian).

16. Leontiev A.A. (2003) The Life and Creative Path of A.N. Leontiev. Mos-cow: Smysl (in Russian).

17. Leontiev A.A. & Leontiev D.A. (2003) The Myth about the Breakup: A.N. Leontiev and L. S. Vygotsky in 1932. Psikhologichesky zhurnal. 2003. No. 1, pp. 14–21 (in Russian).

18. Marx K. (1955) Theses on Feuerbach. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 3, pp. 1–4). Moscow: Politizdat (Russian translation).

19. Marx K. (1974) Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 42, pp. 41–174). Moscow: Politizdat (Russian translation).

20. Orlov A.B. (2003) A.N. Leontiev – L.S. Vygotsky: An Essay on the Development of Division. Voprosy psikhologii. 2003. No. 2, pp. 70–85 (in Russian).

21. Ovchinnikov O.V., Tikhomirov A.K., Zaporozhets A.V., & Zinchenko V.P. (Eds.) (1983) A.N. Leontiev and Modern Psychology (Collected Articles in Memory of A.N. Leontiev). Moscow: Moscow University Press (in Russian).

22. Petrenko V.F. (2018) On the Problem of Collective Unconscious in the Framework of Philosophy of Post-Non-Classical Rationality and Constructivism Psychology. Voprosy filosofii. 2018. No. 2, pp. 89–101 (in Russian).

23. Platonov K.K. (1972) On the System of Psychology. Moscow: Mysl (in Russian).

24. Sergeev S.F. (2012) Regulation, Self-Regulation, Self-Organization, Self-Development in the Conceptual Basis of Psychology. In: Bodrov V.A. & Zhuravlev A.L. (Eds.) Actual Problems of Psychology of Work, Engineering Psychology and Ergonomics (Issue 4, pp. 238–259). Moscow: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences Pub. (in Russian).

25. Sergeev S.F. (2014) Ergonomics and Engineering Psychology of the Technogenic World: Issues of Methodology and Theory. In: Anokhin A.N., Paderno P.I., & Sergeev S.F. (Eds.) Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference “Psychology of labor, engineering psychology and ergonomics 2014” (Ergo 2014) (Saint Petersburg, Russia, July 3–5, 2014) (pp. 35–42). Saint Petersburg: Interregional Ergonomic Association (in Russian).

26. Smirnov S.D. (1993) General Psychological Theory of Activity: Prospects and Limitations (On the 90th Anniversary of the Birth of A. N. Leontiev). Voprosy psikhologii. 1993. No. 4, pp. 94–101 (in Russian).

27. Sonin A.S. (1994) “Physical idealism”: History of One Ideological Campaign. Moscow: Fizmatlit (in Russian).

28. Sukhodolsky G.V. (1988) Foundations of the Psychological Theory of Activity. Leningrad: Leningrad University Press (in Russian).

29. Sukhodolsky G.V. (2006) On the Leningrad (Saint Petersburg) and Mos-cow Psychological Schools. In: Krylov A.A. & Tsvetkova L.A. (Eds.) Saint Petersburg School of Psychology: Past, Present, Future (pp. 328–332). Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University Press (in Russian).

30. Yudin E.G. (1978) System Approach and Principle of Activity. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).

31. Zinchenko V.P. (1993) Cultural-Historical Psychology and Psychological Theory of Activity: Live Contradictions and Points of Growth. Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series 14: Psychology. 1993. No. 2, pp. 41–50 (in Russian).

32. Zinchenko V.P. (2013) Psychology of action. The contribution of the Kharkov psychological school. Cultural-Historical psychology. 2013. No. 1, pp. 92–107 (in Russian).

33. Zinchenko V.P. & Morgunov E.B. (1994) Developing Man. Essays on Russian Psychology. Moscow: Trivola (in Russian).

34. Zhuravlev A.L. & Ushakov D.V. (2011) Fundamental Psychology and Practice: Issues of Interaction. Psikhologichesky zhurnal. 2011. No. 3, pp. 5–16 (in Russian).