Perception, Logic and Plurality of Rational Representations of the World

The article covers such issues as the relevance of the theory of perception as a multi-level information processing, the methodological role of the concept of representation and the relation of neurodynamic structures to subjective experience. The author critically reviews the philosophical presumptions underlying the various concepts of “local rationality,” the core of which is constituted by the belief that large ethnic cultures generate or are based on their own rationality and their own logic. Three statements are successively considered: (a) thinking is based on the inherent rules of rationality, (b) logic is an extract of rationality, and (c) types of rationality are geographically consistent with large ethnocultural communities. Empirical arguments are presented that demonstrate equivocality (if not falsity) of the first two theses. In particular, firstly, it is shown that the genuine rationality of thinking lies not in following the rules that are immanent to it, but in the development of thinking and, more broadly, cognitive operations towards optimization of certain indicators of the cognitive or motor system that are important for survival and adaptation. In addition, this rationality is multivariate, and the choice between variants is often weakly determined or even random. Thus, the first statement turns out to be refuted. Secondly, by reference to the well-known experiments, it is shown that most people do not explicitly follow some declared logical rules in solving even logical or mathematical problems, and yet there is reason to consider their behavior rational. The third thesis, as shown with some limited empirical material, appears to be partially confirmed. Nevertheless, the demonstration of the doubtfulness of the first two theses makes the conclusion that different nations have different logics insufficiently substantiated.

1. Anderson J.R. (1990) The Adaptive Character of Thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

2. Bender A. & Beller S. (2011) The Cultural Constitution of Cognition: Taking the Anthropological Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 2, article 67. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00067

3. Felin T., Koenderink J., & Krueger J.I. (2017) Rationality, Perception, and the All-Seeing Eye. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1040–1059. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1198-z

4. Gerasimova I.A. (2016) Constructivism as a Logical Style and a Problem of the Chinese Logic. The Philosophy Journal. Vol. 9, no 4, pp. 128–146. DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2016-9-4-128-146 (in Russian).

5. Gigerenzer G. (1998). Ecological Intelligence: An Adaptation for Frequencies. In: Cummind D.D. & Allen C. (Eds.) The Evolution of Mind (pp. 9-29). New York: Oxford University Press.

6. Kahneman D. (2003) Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. American Economic Review. Vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 1449– 1475.

7. Karelova L.B. (2018) Nishida Kitaro’s Logical Theory as a Reflection of the Rationality of Japanese Language and Culture. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. 2018. No. 7, pp. 59–70. DOI: 10.30727/0235-1188-2018-7-59-70 (in Russian).

8. Kondrashikhina O. A. (2009) Differencial Psychology: A Textbook. Kyiv: Tsentr uchebnoy literatury (in Russian).

9. Loginov N.I. & Spiridonov V.F. (2017) Embodied Cognition as a Current Trend in Cognitive Psychology. Vestnik SPbSU. Psychology and Education. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 25–42 (in Russian).

10. Marr D. (2010) Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. Cambridge: MIT Press.

11. O’Regan J.K. & Noë A. (2001) A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 939–973.

12. Oaksford M. & Chater N. (1996) Rational Explanation of the Selection Task. Psychological Review. Vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 381–391.

13. Schooler L. (2001) Rational Theory of Cognition in Psychology. In: International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 12771–12775). Oxford: Pergamon.

14. Shiraev E.B. & Levy D.A. (2016) Cross-Cultural Psychology: Critical Thinking and Contemporary Applications (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.

15. Simons D.J. & Chabris C.F. (1999) Gorilla in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events. Perception. Vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1059–1074.

16. Smirnov A.V. (2019) Processual Logic and Its Grounding. Voprosy filosofii. 2019. No 2, pp. 5–17 (in Russian).

17. Zhumagaliyeva B. & Barabanova E. (2014) The Culture and Ethnicity Influence on The Manifestation of Human Cognitive Styles. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 159, pp. 765–769.