G. Lukács, “Techeniye” and Stalinism

The article discusses the attitude of Georg Lukács and his adherents who formed a circle “Techeniye” (lit. “current”) toward the phenomenon of Stalinism. Despite the political nature of the topic, the authors are aspired to provide an unbiased research. G. Lukács’ views on the theory and practice of Stalinism evolved over time. In the 1920s Lukács welcomes the idea of creation of socialism in one country and abandons the former revolutionary ideas expressed in his book History and Class Consciousness. This turn is grounded by new interpretation of Hegel as “realistic” thinker whose “realism” was shown in the aspiration to find “reconciliation” with reality (of the Prussian state) and in denial of any utopias. The philosophical evolution leading to “realism” assumes integration of revolutionaries into the hierarchy of existing society. The article “Hölderlin’s Hyperion” represents attempt to justify Stalinism as a necessary and “progressive” phase of revolutionary development of the proletariat. Nevertheless, events of the second half of the 1930s (mass repressions, the peace treaty with Nazi Germany) force Lukács to realize the catastrophic nature of political strategy of Stalinism. In his works, Lukács ceases to analyze political topics and concentrates on problems of aesthetics and literary criticism. However, his aesthetic position allows to reconstruct the changed political views and to understand why he had earned the reputation of the “internal opponent” to Stalinism. After 1956, Lukács turns to political criticism of Stalinism, which nevertheless remains unilateral. He sees in Stalinism a kind of the left sectarianism, the theory and practice of the implementation of civil war measures in the era of peaceful co-existence of two systems.

1. Arslanov V. (2007) Postmodernism and Russian Third Way: Tertium Datur of 20th-century Russian culture. Moscow: Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya (in Russian).

2. Autant-Mathieu M.-C. (2013) Reception of Brecht in the USSR. New Russian Humanitarian Studies. 2013. No. 8, pp. 16–17 (in Russian).

3. Bazhenov D. (2018) Lukács and His Theory of Reification: Philosophical Bolshevism from West. In: Dialogue of World-Views: Life Way of Man, Society, State. Proceedings of 14th International Symposium (pp. 21–33). Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Management of RANEPA (in Russian).

4. Khrenov N.A. (2017) Paradoxes of Oblivion and Revival of Ideas in Humanities (Bakhtin and Lukács). Kul’tura kultury. 2017. No. 1–2, pp. 10–11 (in Russian).

5. Kulischkina O.N. & Poluboyarinova L.N. (2018) Theodor Adorno and George Lukács about Realism and Decadence. Alleya nauki. Vol. 5, no. 4 (in Russian).

6. Kuzias T. (2017) Georg Lukács and the Goethe Prize. Vestnik SPbSU. Philosophy and Conflict Studies. Vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 400–413 (Russian translation).

7. Lagurev A.S. (2018) Lukács: History of Life in the Space of Ontology. Studia Culturae. 2018. Vol. 37, pp. 175–183 (in Russian).

8. Lifshitz M.A. (2004) What is Classics? Moscow: Iskusstvo – XXI vek (in Russian).

9. Lukács G. (1939) Hölderlin`s Hyperion. In: Lukács G. On the History of Realism (pp. 39–57). Moscow: Goslitizdat (Russian translation).

10. Lukács G. (1987) Young Hegel and Problems of Capitalist Society. Moscow: Nauka (Russian translation).

11. Lukács G. (1989a) The Letter to Alberto Carocci. Filosofskie nauki. 1989. No. 6, pp. 102–104 (Russian translation).

12. Lukács G. (1989b) On Debates between China and Soviet Union. Filosofskie nauki. 1989. No. 6, pp. 105–111 (Russian translation).

13. Lukács G. (2003) History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Moscow: Logos-Altera (Russian translation).

14. Lukács G. (2006) Moses Hess and the Problems of Idealist Dialectics. In: Lukács G. Political Texts (pp. 222–263). Moscow: Tri kvadrata (Russian translation).

15. Lukoyanov V. & Sherikhova E. (2018) Lukács and Benjamin: Two Versions of Historical Materialism. Logos. Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 143–155 (in Russian).

16. Makarenko V.P. (2012) Refined Dogmatist. Political Conceptology: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. 2012. No. 1, pp. 126–159 (in Russian).

17. Pavlov P.V. (2019) Aesthetics and Tragedy of Revolution: Views of Georg Lukács in Moscow Period of the 1930s. Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Art. 2019. No. 1, pp. 86–94 (in Russian).

18. Poltavtseva N. (2011) Platonov and Lukács (From the History of Soviet Art of the 1930s). Novoye literaturnoye obozrenie. 2011. No. 1, pp. 253–270 (in Russian).

19. Potseluev S.P. (2018) Rememebering Lukács. Political Conceptology: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. 2018. No. 1, pp. 57–69 (in Russian).

20. Stykalin A.S. (2001) Georg Lukács as a Thinker and Politician. Moscow: Stepanenko Publisher (in Russian)

21. Stykalin A.S. (2018) Whom Lukács Is Dangerous to? Istoricheskaya ekspertiza. 2018. No. 3, pp. 181–193 (in Russian).

22. Trotsky L. (1935) The Workers’ State, Thermidor and Bonapartism. Byulleten’ oppozitsii. Issue 41, pp. 2–13 (in Russian).

23. Zemlyanoy S.N. (2017) George Lukács and Western Marxism. Moscow: Kanon+ (in Russian).