“From Top Down” and “from Bottom Up” Factors of Inversions in Russian History
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-8-16-32
Abstract
Explanation of inversions in Russian history causes major conceptual problems. The traditionally used conceptual apparatus and its theoretical schemes does not seem to really “grasp” this reality, at best, it only describes the Russian reality to some extent. It simply fails to capture the nature and mechanisms that lie in the specifics of Russian society and its dynamics. Hence, there are widespread conclusions about “pathology,” historical “rut,” constant matrix, and endless reproduction of the “predetermined” characteristics of social life in Russia. However, expanding the conceptual apparatus with a constructive approach, combined with a specific historical approach, makes it possible to single out more than one agent of modernization processes (political elite, merged with state authorities), but at least two - authority and society taken discreetly. From this point of view, the inverse nature of Russian modernization has two causes. One of these is social, associated with the peculiarities of Russian society, where underdeveloped social forces are dominated by the imperious will. The second cause is related to modernization attempts based on external historical experience. However, due to the former cause, these attempts turn out to be premature and ill-conceived, giving rise to new conflicts and deformations in society. Both causes are complementary and intertwined. At the same time, there are general civilizational processes, such as urbanization and formation of a mass society, modernization processes in Russian society, including the formation of national identity. This creates prerequisites for a qualitative change in the development of society. If the main factors of inversion “from top down” are hasty and imitative, then doing things “from bottom up” presupposes slow development of the middle class, which, nevertheless, creates conditions for real mediation.
About the Author
Grigorii L. TulchinskiiRussian Federation
D.Sc. In Philosophy, Professor at the SPSU, Professor at the N RUHSE
References
1. Akhiezer A.S. (1998) Rossiya: kritika istoricheskogo opyta (sotsiokulturnaya dinamika Rossii). T. 1. Ot proshlogo k budushchemu [Russia: A Critique of Historical Experience (Socio-Cultural Dynamics of Russia). Vol: 1. From the Past to the Future]. Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy khro-nograf (in Russian).
2. Akhiezer A., Klyamkin I., & Yakovenko I. (2008) IstoriyaRossii: konets ili novoye nachalo? [History of Russia: The End or a New Beginning?] Moscow: Novoye izdatel’stvo (in Russian).
3. Bessonova O.E. (2015) Genezis rossiyskoy matritsy v kontekste obschih institutsionalnykh protsessov [The Genesis of the Russian Matrix in the Context of General Institutional Processes]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. No. 10, pp. 64-73 (in Russian).
4. Bessonova O.E. (2018) Institutsionalnaya matritsa sotsialnogo gosu-darstva i demokratii v Rossii [The institutional matrix of the social state and democracy in Russia]. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya. Vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 50-67 (in Russian).
5. Burnham J. (1941) The Managerial Revolution: What is Happening in the World. New York: John Day Co.
6. Calzada I. (2018) Metropolitanising Small European Stateless City-Regionalised Nations. Space and Polity. Vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 342-361.
7. Dalle Mulle E. (2017) The Nationalism of the Rich: Discourses and Strategies of Separatist Parties in Catalonia, Flanders, Northern Italy and Scotland. London: Routledge.
8. Bilas M. (1957) The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System. London: Thames and Hudson.
9. Eisenstadt S.N. (2003) Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities (2 vols): A Collection of Essays. Leiden: Brill.
10. Eisenstadt S.N. (2017) Multiple Modernities. In: Eisenstadt S.N. (Ed.) Multiple Modernities (pp. 1-30). London: Routledge.
11. Gurova O. (2019) Patriotism as Creative (Counter-) Conduct of Russian Fashion Designers. In: Bajde D., Kjeldgaard D., & Belk R. (Eds.) Consumer Culture Theory. Vol. 20: Research in Consumer Behavior. (pp. 151-168). Bingley: Emerald.
12. Kirdina S.G. (2014) Institutsionalnyye matritsy i razvitiye Rossii. Vve-deniye v X-Y-teoriyu [Institutional Matrices and the Development of Russia. Introduction to X-Y-Theory] (3rd ed.).Moscow: Nestor-Istoriya (in Russian).
13. Kordonsky S.G. (2009) Administrativno-territorialnaya struktura i ee resurso-soslovnaya priroda [Administrative-Territorial Structure and Its Resource-Class Nature]. Mir Rossii. 2009. No. 3, pp. 3-38 (in Russian).
14. Harrison L.E. & Hantinghton S.P. (Eds.) (2000) Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. New York: Basic Books.
15. Hedlund S. (2011) Invisible Hands, Russian Experience, and Social Science: Approaches to Understanding Systemic Failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Miller A.I. (2016) Natsiya. ili Mogushchestvo mifa [Nation, or the Power of Myth]. Saint Petersburg: European University at Saint Petersburg Press (in Russian).
17. Navarro B. (2016) Creative industries and Britpop: The Marketisation of Culture, Politics and National Identity. Consumption Markets & Culture. Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 228-243.
18. Nikolsky S.A. (2018) Rossiyskaya filosofiya istorii: opyt ponimaniya [Russian Philosophy of History: The Experience of Understanding]. Philosophy Journal. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 121-139 (in Russian).
19. North D.C., Wallis J.J., Weingast B.R. (2009) Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Pavlovsky G. (1995) Slepoye pyatno (Svedeniya o belovezhskikh lyudyakh) [Blind Spot (Information about the Belovezha People)]. In: Chernyshev B.V. (Ed.) Inoye. Khrestomatiya novogo rossiyskogo samosoznaniya [Other. An Anthology of the New Russian Identity] (vol. 3). Moscow: Argus (in Russian).
21. Pipes R. (2005) Dva puti Rossii [Two Ways of Russia]. Moscow: Algo-ritm (Russian translation).
22. Pivovarov Y. S. (2006) Russkaya Vlast i publichnaya politika (Zametki istorika o prichinakh neudachi demokraticheskogo tranzita) [Russian Power and Public Policy (Notes of a Historian on the Reasons for the Failure of Democratic transition]. Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya. 2006. No. 1, pp. 12-32 (in Russian).
23. Tulchinsky G.L. (2017) Osmysleniye rossiyskikh modernizatsionnykh inversiy: ot A.Akhiyezera k S.Khedlundu [Understanding Russian modernization inversions: from A. Akhiezer to S. Hedlund]. In: Zaostrovtsev A.P. (Ed.) Rossiya 1917-2017: Evropeyskaya modernizatsiya ili osobyy put’ [Russia 1917-2017: European modernization or a special way?] (pp. 69-90). Saint Petersburg: Leontyevskiy tsentr (in Russian).
24. Voslensky M. (1984) Nomenklatura: Anatomy of the Soviet Ruling Class. London: The Bodley Head.
25. Zaostrovtsev A.P. (2017) “Sluzhiloye gosudarstvo” v postsovetskoy Rossii: II reinkarnatsiya “Matritsy Moskovii” [“Service State” in Post-Soviet Russia: 2nd Reincarnation of the “Matrix of Muscovy”]. In: Zaostrovtsev A.P. (Ed.) Rossiya 1917-2017: Evropeyskaya modernizatsiya ili osobyy put’? [1917-2017: European modernization or a special way?] (pp. 46-68). Saint Petersburg: Leontyevskiy tsentr (in Russian).
26. Zhang X. (2015) “Voting with Dollars”: A Cross-Polity and Multilevel Analysis of Political Consumerism. International Journal of Consumer Studies. Vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 422-436.
Review
For citations:
Tulchinskii G.L. “From Top Down” and “from Bottom Up” Factors of Inversions in Russian History. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2019;62(8):16-32. https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-8-16-32