Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

Paradoxes of Space

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-8-122-138

Abstract

The article discusses the transition of culture from the space that is typical of the classical picture of the world to the non-classical space and the role of art in this process. The author considers the concepts of “social space,” “cultural space,” cultural time and related media. The “cultural space” in human history is associated with people who supported culture in the cultural space. At first they were shamans, later priests and professional artists. But cultural space and cultural time depend on the stages of language development and the general worldview. A striking example here is the vocabulary of the Hopi tribe, where there was no equivalent for the concept of “time”. We analyzed spaces in Modern times. During this period, technology began dictating the rules to aesthetics more and more persistently. In the 18th century, there appeared a number of technical media and then sensory media. Quantum mechanics and physics, this basis of a new view of the world and space, appeared and established itself in the science of the nineteenth century. But in many ways it was art that had foreshadowed the new view of the world. In the 20th century, the augmented reality (AR) technologies that complement our physical world and also virtual reality (VR) appeared. Virtual reality (VR) transports you to the periphery of the classical physical world, where your find yourself in the power of the subconscious. Virtual space created by technical devices means a phantom space, which is transmitted to man through the senses like vision, hearing, smell, touch, and other factors that contribute to forming a special new world and novel spaces.

About the Author

Evgeny V. Dukov
State Institute for Art Studies
Russian Federation

D.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor, Main Research Fellow.

Moscow



References

1. Artaud A. (2000) Theater and Its Double. Moscow: Simpozium (Russian translation).

2. Augustine of Hippo (1969) Confessions. In: Solokov V.V. (Ed.) Anthology of World Philosophy (vol. 1, part 2). Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).

3. Bachelard G. (1958) LaPoetique de l’Espace. Paris: PUF (in French).

4. Berkeley G. (2000) Collected Works. Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).

5. Braslavsky P.I. (2003) Theater and Its Double - Virtual Reality. Izvestia. Ural State University Journal. 2003. No. 27, pp. 88-96.

6. Demina I.N. (2010) Transformation of the Media System: General Approaches and Technological Aspect. Bulletin of Baikal State University. 2010. No. 1, pp. 159-163.

7. Habermas J. (1962) Strukturwandel der Offentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der burgerlichen Gesellschaft. Neuwied: Luchterhand (in German).

8. Eco W. (1984) Mirrors (Russian translation in: Metaphysical research: Language (issue 11, pp. 218-244). Saint Petersburg: Aletheia, 1999).

9. Koyre A. (1961) Le vide et l’espace infini au XIVe siecle. In: Koyre A. Etudes d’histoire de la pensee philosophique. Paris: Armand Colin (in French).

10. Mankovskaya N.B. (2016) The Phenomenon of Postmodernism. Artistic and Aesthetic Perspective (2nd ed.). Saint Petersburg: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ (in Russian).

11. Novikov I.D. (1990) Where Does the River of Time Flow? Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya (in Russian).

12. Pratchett T. (1992) Lords and Ladies (Russian translation: Moscow, Eksmo, 2017).

13. Quennell M. & Quennell C.H.B. (2005) Primitive People. Life, Religion, Culture. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf (Russian translation).

14. Schrodinger E. (1958) Mind and Matter (Russian translation: Izhevsk: Research Center on Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, 2000).

15. Shternberg L.Y. (1936) Primitive Religion in the Light of Ethnography. Leningrad: Institut narodov Severa (in Russian).

16. Solovieva E.V. (2009) The Concepts of “Public” and “Communicative Action” of Jtirgen Habermas as a Tool for Analyzing Social Partnership. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences. No. 13, pp. 62-66.

17. Tonnies F. (2002) Community and Society. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ (Russian translation).

18. Turchin A.V. & Batin M.A. (2013) Futurology: 21st Century. Immortality or Global Catastrophe? Moscow: Binom (in Russian).

19. Whitrow G.J. (1961) The Natural Philosophy of Time (Russian translation: M., URSS, 1964 .

20. Whorf B.L. (1952) The Relation of Habitual Thought and Behavior to Language. In: Whorf B.L. Collected Papers on Methalinguistics. Washington, DC: Foreign Service Institute.

21. Zelmanov A.L. (1970) Some Philosophical Aspects of Modern Cosmology and Related Problems of Physics. In: Dialectics and Modern Science (pp. 395-400). Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Dukov E.V. Paradoxes of Space. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2019;62(8):122-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-8-122-138



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)