The Issue of Sociability in the Early Modern Moral Philosophy*

The idea of sociability - a person’s disposition and ability to communicate and live in the community - goes through the whole history of philosophy. Due to the peculiarity of translations, this term and the whole tradition related to it have been lost to the Russian reader. The article discusses some tendencies in comprehending the idea of sociability in early modern moral philosophy. The key to this consideration is F. Hutcheson’s essay On the Natural Sociability of Mankind, the title of which contains the very term “sociability” and which presents the main essential points in a discussion of the issue in the first third of the 18^th century. One can distinguish two main approaches to the problem. According to one of them, sociability determined by various human natural needs is the basis of social relations, and a person becomes a moral agent as a social being (H. Grotius, T. Hobbes, S. Pufen-dorf, B. Mandeville). According to another approach, sociability is a manifestation of a person’s natural tendency to care for the good of others, and its consistent implementation leads to the formation of community and supports its stability (Cambridge Platonists, Shaftesbury, Hutcheson, J. Butler, D. Hume, A. Smith). Representatives of both approaches recognized contradiction in manifestations of sociability or in its nature. I. Kant theoretically overcame the confrontation between these approaches and conceptualized the contradiction and associated it with the human nature. According to Kant, the “unsociable sociability” is given in the fact that a person has a tendency to sociability but also a tendency to self-assertion at the expense of others. However, despite the presence of asocial features (evil principle), Kant considered the person’s inherent sociability (good principle) as a prerequisite for culture and as one of the most important conditions of possibility of morality.

1. Apressyan R.G. (2018) Towards Conceptualization of Morality in the Early Modern Philosophy. Voprosy Filosopfii. 2018. No.11, pp. 35-46 (in Russian).

2. Aristotle (1983a) Nicomachean Ethics (N.V. Braginskaya, Trans.)- In: Aristotle. Works. In 4 vols. (Vol. 4, pp. 53-294). Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).

3. Aristotle (1983a) Politics (S. Zhebelev, Trans.). In: Aristotle. Works. In 4 vols. (Vol. 4, pp. 375-644). Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).

4. Artemyeva O.V. (2018) The Problem of Moral Capacity in Early Modern Moral Philosophy. Ethical Thought. Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 72-85 (in Russian).

5. Cicero (1974). On Duties. In: Cicero. On Old Age. On Friendship. On Duties (pp. 58-158). Moscow: Nauka (Russian translation).

6. Darwall S. (2013) Honor, History, and Relationship: Essays in Second-Personal Ethics II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

7. Darwall S. (2014) The Social and the Sociable. Philosophical Topics. Vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 201-217.

8. Darwall S. (2017) The Foundations of Morality: Virtue, Law, and Obligation (R.G. Apressyan, Trans.). Ethical Thought. 2017. No. 1, pp. 18-47 (Russian translation).

9. Graham G. (2014) Francis Hutcheson and Adam Ferguson on Sociability. History of Philosophy Quarterly. Vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 317-323.

10. Grotius H. (1994). The Rights of War and Peace. Moscow: Ladomir (Russian translation).

11. Grotius H. (2005) The Rights of War and Peace. In 3 vols. (Vol. 1) (R. Tuck, Ed.). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

12. Hobbes T. (1989) On the Citizen. In: Hobbes T. Works. In 2 vols. (Vol. 1, pp. 270-506). Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).

13. Hobbes T. (1991) Leviathan. In: Hobbes T. Works. In 2 vols. (Vol. 1, pp. 3-546). Moscow: Mysl’ (in Russian).

14. Hutcheson F. (1973). An Inquiry Into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. Treatise II. An Inquiry Concerning the Original of Our Ideas of Virtue or Moral Good. In: Francis Hutcheson, David Hume, Adam Smith. Aesthetics (pp. 41-261). Moscow: Iskusstvo (Russian translation).

15. Kant I. (1994a) Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim. In: Kant I. Collected works. In 8 vols. (Vol. 8, pp. 12-28). Moscow: Choro (Russian translation ).

16. Kant I. (1994b) Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. In: Kant I. Collected works. In 8 vols. (Vol. 8, pp. 5-223). Moscow: Choro (Russian translation ).

17. Kant I. (2009) Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim (A. Wood, Trans.). In: Rorty A.O. & Schmidt J. (Eds.) Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim: A Critical Guide (pp. 9-23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18. Kant I. (2019) Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltburgerlicher Absicht. Gottingen: Vollstantige Neuausgabe.

19. Hobbes T. (1996) Leviathan (C.A. Gaskin, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford Univcr-sity Press.

20. Hutcheson F. (2006) On the Natural Sociability of Mankind. In: Hutcheson F. Logic, Metaphysics and the Natural Sociability of Mankind (J. Moore & M. Silverthorne, Eds.) (pp. 189-216). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

21. Irwin T. (2008) The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study. Vol. II: From Suarez to Rousseau. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

22. Prokofyev A.V. (2018) Francis Hutcheson and the Possibility of Moral Virtue Beyond the Scope of Benevolence. Ethical Thought. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 43-56 (in Russian).

23. Pufendorf S. (2017). On the Origin and the Progress of the Science of Natural Law (A. Sochilin, Trans.). Ethical Thought. 2017. No. 1, pp. 136149 ( Russian translation).

24. Schneewind J.B. (2009) Good out of Evil: Kant and the Idea of Unsocial Sociability In: Rorty A.O. & Schmidt J. (Eds.) Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim: A Critical Guide (pp. 94-111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

25. Schneewind J.B. (2010) Essays on the History of Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.