Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

The Status of Mind and Intellect in Digital Environment

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-2-123-143

Abstract

The article examines the impact of digitalization on human life and intellectual experience. The development of computer technology demands an understanding of new aspects of human development and requires a capability to overcome not only external conditions but also ourselves. Entering a new level of development cannot imply a complete rejection of previous dispositions, but should be accompanied by reflection on personal experience and by the quest for new forms of interaction in society and with nature. Communicative and cognitive activity of a person has an ontological basis and relies on processes that actually evolve in nature. Therefore, the creation of new objects is always associated with the properties of natural material and gives rise to new points of support in the development of man. The more audacious his projects, the more important it is to preserve this connection to nature. It is always the human being who turns out to be the initiator who knows how to solve problems. The conformity of complex technical systems to nature is not only a goal but also a value of meaningful construction of development perspectives. The key to the nature orientation of the modern digital world is the human being himself, who keeps all the secrets of the culture of his natural development. Therefore, the proposed by the Russian philosopher V.S. Stepin post-non-classical approach, based on the principle of “human-sizedness,” is an important contribution to contemporary research because it draws attention to the “human – machine” communication, to the relationship between a person and technological systems he created. The article concludes that during digital transformation, a cultural conflict arises: in an effort to solve the problems of the future, a person equips his life with devices that are designed to support him, to expand his functionality, but at the same time, the boundaries of humanity become dissolved and the forms of human activity undergo simplification. Transhumanism engages society in the fight against fears of vulnerability and memory loss and ignores the flexibility and sustainability of natural foundation.

About the Author

Elena I. Yaroslavtseva
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation
Elena I. Yaroslavtseva – Ph.D. in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Senior Research Fellow of the Department of Philosophical Problems of Creativity, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences; Head of the System Integration Laboratory of the International Institute of New Educational Technologies of the Russian State University for the Humanities.


References

1. Anokhin P.K. (1998) Selected Works: Cybernetics of Functional Systems (K.V. Sudakov, Ed.). Moscow: Meditsina (in Russian).

2. Arshinov V.I. & Budanov V.G. (2019) V.S. Stepin’s Concept of Post-NonClassical Science and N.N. Moiseev’s Concept of Universal Evolutionism. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 96–112. DOI: 10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-4-96-112

3. Bernstein N.A. (1997) Biomechanics and Physiology of Movements (V.P. Zinchenko, Ed.). Moscow: Institute of Practical Psychology (in Russian).

4. Bernstein N.A. (2008) Biomechanics and Physiology of Movements: Selected Psychological Works. Moscow: Moscow Psychological-Social Institute Press (in Russian).

5. Chetverikova O.N. (2018) Transhumanism in Russian Education. Our Children as a Commodity. Moscow: Knizhnyy mir (in Russian).

6. Del Aguila J.W.V. & Solana E.P. (2015) Transhumanism, Neuroethics and Human Person. Revista Bioética. Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 503–510.

7. Ferrero L.M.T. (2016) Considering Human Vulnerability and Transhumanism: Some Theological Perspectives. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Vol. 40, pp. 683–686.

8. Lektorsky V.A. (2019) N.N. Moiseev and V.S. Stepin: Two Prophets in Their Own Country. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 58–62. DOI: 10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-4-58-62

9. McLuhan H.M. (1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw Hill (Russian translation: Moscow: Kanon-Press-Ts, 2003).

10. Maksimova E.V. (2008) Levels of Communication. Causes of Early Infantile Autism and Its Correction Based on the Theory of N.A. Bernstein. Moscow: Dialog-MIFI (in Russian).

11. Porshnev B.F. (2007) On the Beginning of Human History (Problems of Paleopsychology). Saint Petersburg: Aletheia (in Russian).

12. Pugh J.C. (2017) The Disappearing Human: Gnostic Dreams in a Transhumanist World. Religions. Vol. 8, no. 5, article 81.

13. Rubin T. (2014) Eclipse of Man: Human Extinction and the Meaning of Progress. New York: New Atlantis Books, 2014.

14. Savelyev S.V. (2018a) Variability and Genius (3rd ed.). Moscow: VEDI (in Russian).

15. Savelyev S.V. (2018b) Morphology of Consciousness (Vol. 1). Moscow: VEDI (in Russian).

16. Transhumanist Declaration (2019). Humanity+. Retrieved from http://humanityplus.org/philosophy/transhumanist-declaration

17. Yaroslavtseva E.I. (2013) The Ascent of Man to Choice: The Standards of Topos of Interactive Communications. In: Kiseleva M.S. (Ed.) Man Yesterday and Today: Interdisciplinary Research (Vol. 7, pp. 149–169). Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences.


Review

For citations:


Yaroslavtseva E.I. The Status of Mind and Intellect in Digital Environment. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2020;63(2):123-143. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-2-123-143



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)