Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

Modernity in the Context of the Discourse on Secularization

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-4-25-45

Abstract

The article considers the problem of the relations between modernity and secularization. The author argues that the discourse on secularization is the most appropriate strategy for modern self-understanding. The discourse itself is not homogeneous. One approach is a classical theory of secularization, which considers the secularization as a universal world-historical process, which passed the stages “modernization – secularization – rationalization.” Other approach is to interpret modern society as a post-secular society, but with relevance to religious ethos. This approach considers Modernity as a unique social reality with a specific type of rationality and a set of behavioral strategies, which were formed as a result of the transformation (secularization) of religious social reality, the center of which was a Christian myth. Accordingly, modernization becomes the result of secularization, and not vice versa, as the proponents of the first approach assumed. The thematization in the discourse on the secularization of a new type of society, which J. Habermas called post-secular society, demonstrates a crisis of principles constituting the Modernity’s foundations. Predictions of the epoch of an irreligious society did not come true, and secular reason is now forced to reckon with other types of rationality and take them into account, including in public space. This situation suggests that we are witnessing the birth of a new form of social reality. Thus, the article concludes: (1) discourse on secularization is recognized as the most adequate strategy of the comprehension of Modernity; (2) secularization should be viewed as a consistent detranscendentalization of Christian social reality; (3) the emergence of a post-secular society indicates fundamental transformations in the field of the most general ideas about the nature of cultural mind and cultural identities.

About the Author

Viktor S. Levytskyy
Ukrainian Institute of Strategies of Global Development and Adaptation
Belgium

Viktor S. Levytskyy – Ph.D. in Philosophy, Director of the Ukrainian Institute of Strategies of Global Development and Adaptation.

Brussels



References

1. Belokobylskiy A.V. & Levitskyy V.S. (Eds.) (2018) Watersheds of Secularization: Western Civilizational Project and Global Alternatives. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proyekt (in Russian).

2. Berger P.L. (1967) The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New York: Doubleday (Russian translation: Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2019).

3. Berger P.L. (1973) The Social Reality of Religion. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

4. Berger P.L. (2011) Incomplete Concept. Religiovedcheskie issledovaniya. Nos. 5–6, pp. 103–110 (Russian translation).

5. Berger P.L. (2012) Further Thoughts on Religion and Modernity. Society. Vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 313–316.

6. Caputo J.D. (2011) How the Secular World Became Post-Secular. Logos. No. 3, pp. 186–205 (Russian translation).

7. Casanova J. (1994) Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

8. Casanova J. (2006) Rethinking Secularization: A Global Comparative Perspective. The Hedgehog Review. Vol. 8, nos. 1–2, pp. 7–22.

9. Chaves M. (1994) Secularization as Declining Religious Authority. Social Forces. Vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 749–774.

10. Dobbelaere K. (1999) Towards an Integrated Perspective of the Processes Related to the Descriptive Concept of Secularization. Sociology of Religion. Vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 229–247.

11. Durkheim É. (1990) The Division of Labour in Society. The Rules of Sociological Method. Moscow: Nauka (Russian translation).

12. Habermas J. (2002) Faith and Knowledge. In: Habermas J. The Future of Human Nature (pp. 115–132). Moscow: Ves’ Mir (Russian translation).

13. Habermas J. (2008, September 16) A “Post-Secular” Society – What Does That Mean? Reset Dialogues on Civilization. Retrieved from https://www.resetdoc.org/story/a-post-secular-society-what-does-that-mean/

14. alism and Religion: Philosophical Papers (pp. 109–141). Moscow: Ves’ Mir (Russian translation).

15. Habermas J. & Ratzinger J. (2006) Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion. Moscow: St. Andrew Bible-Theological Institute (Russian translation).

16. Karpov V. (2012) Desecularization: A Conceptual Framework. Gosudarstvo. Religiya. Tserkov’. No. 3, pp. 114–164 (in Russian).

17. Luckmann T. (2014) Appendex to Invisible Religion’s 3 rd Edition. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie. Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 139–154 (Russian translation).

18. Marx K. (1933) The German Ideology. Moscow: Partiynoe izdatel’stvo (Russian translation).

19. Riesebrodt M. (2014) Religion in the Modern World: Between Secularization and Resurgence. Fiesole: European University Institute. Retrieved from https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/29698/MWP_LS_2014_01_Riesebrodt.pdf

20. Sacks J. (2013) The Limits of Secularism. Voprosy filosofii. No. 4, pp. 20–27 (Russian translation).

21. Stoeckl K. (2011) The Return of Religion to Social Science and Political Philosophy. Saint Cyril and Methodius Institute for Postgraduate Studies. Retrieved from http://www.doctorantura.ru/images/pdf/kristina_moscow_rus.pdf (in Russian).

22. Taylor C. (1993) Modernity and the Rise of the Public Sphere. In: Peterson G.B. (Ed.) The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Vol. 14, pp. 205260). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

23. Taylor C. (2003) Closed World Structure. In: Wrathall M.A. (Ed.) Religion After Metaphysics (pp. 69–87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (Russian translation in: Logos. 2013. No. 3, pp. 33–55).

24. Taylor C. (2007) А Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Ukrainian translation: Kyiv: Dukh i Litera, 2013).

25. Tönnies F. (2002) Community and Society. Fundamental Concepts of Sociology. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ (Russian translation).

26. Uzlaner D. (2019) The End of Religion? History of Theory of Secularization. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Press (in Russian).

27. van der Zweerde E (2012) Conceptualizing Secularity. Gosudarstvo. Religiya. Tserkov’. No. 3, pp. 69–113 (Russian translation).

28. Weber M. (2016) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (Vol. 1). Moscow: Higher School of Economics Press (Russian translation).

29. Wilson B. (1966) Religion in Secular Society: A Sociological Comment. London: C.A. Watts & Co.


Review

For citations:


Levytskyy V.S. Modernity in the Context of the Discourse on Secularization. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2020;63(4):25-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-4-25-45



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)