On Four Causes of the Existence of the “Platonic” and “Aristotelian” Meanings of “Virtual”

The article discusses the causes for the formation of the polysemanticity of the Latin word virtus (virtue; strength, valor, masculinity) and term virtual, which was derived from virtus. The emergence of the polysemantic character of virtual became possible due to the unique semantics of the word virtus, in which there are two dominant meanings – virtue and strength. According to Ekaterina Taratuta, there are two lines of constructing the meanings of concepts based on the root vir(t) – “Platonic” and “Aristotelian.” We believe that on the basis of the first semantic “dominant” of the word virtus (virtue) a “Platonic” group of meanings of the word virtual was formed, and on the basis of the second “dominant” (strength) the “Aristotelian” group of meanings was formed. The first cause of the existence of the “Platonic” group of the meanings of virtual is the translation of the Greek word ἀρετή using the Latin word virtus in Roman philosophy, Biblical texts and Greek-Byzantine patristic writings, as a result of which the concept of virtus has been enriched with the meanings of the Platonic and Christian concept of ἀρετή. The second cause is that through the Plato’s doctrine of arete-eidos the concept of virtus has been enriched with the meanings of the Platonic concept of εἶδος. As Hans Kremer has shown, in Plato’s doctrine eidos is the source of order and beauty, which is reflected in the empirical world as arete – virtue, goodness; thus, eidos is inextricably linked with arete. As a result, in the “Platonic” sense the virtual is understood as the eidetic, the ideal. The first cause of the existence of the “Aristotelian” group of meanings of virtual is the translation of the Greek word δύναμις using the Latin word virtus in Biblical texts and in Greek-Byzantine patristic writings, as a result of which the concept of virtus has been enriched with the Christian meanings of concept of δύναμις. The second cause is the translation of the Aristotelian concept of δύναμις using the Latin word potentia: the word δύναμις has become the medium, linking the words virtus and potentia and, under the influence of the latter, differences in the meanings of virtus and potentia (and especially their derivatives virtualis (virtual) and potentialis (potential)) have gradually disappeared. As a result, in the “Aristotelian” sense the virtual is understood as the potential, the possible.

the virtual, the ideal, the potential, virtus, ἀρετή (virtue), εἶδος, δύναμις (ability/possibility), potentia (power), Plato, Aristotle

1. Aristotle (1837). Metaphysika. In: Bekker I. (Ed.) Aristotelis Opera (Vols. 7–9). Oxford: E Typographeo academico (in Greek).

2. Aristotle (1928). Metaphysics. In: Ross W.D. (Ed.) The Works of Aristotle (Vol. 8). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

3. Aristotle (1933). The Metaphysics (Part I. Books I–IX) (H. Tredennick, Trans.). London: William Heinemann; New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons (in Greek and English).

4. Aristotle (1976). Metaphysics. In: Aristotle. Works (Vol. 1, pp. 64–367). Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).

5. Aristotle (1995). Metaphysica. Lib. I–XIV. In: Vuillemin-Diem G. (Ed.) Aristoteles Latinus (Vol. XXV 3.2). Leiden: E.J. Brill (Latin translation).

6. Boethius M.S. (1891). Interpretatio Topicorum Arisotelis. In: Patrologiæ Cursus Completus. Series Latina (Vol. 64 (2)). Paris: Apud Garnier Fratres (in Latin).

7. Chiovaro F. (2003). Relics. In: The New Catholic Encyclopedia (2 nd ed; Vol. 12, pp. 50–56). New York: Gale.

8. Chrysostomus I. (1838) Opera Omnia (B. de Montfaucon, Ed.) (Vol. 11). Paris: Apud Gaume Fratres, Bibliopolas (in Greek and Latin).

9. Chrysostomus S.I. (1860). Homilia in epistulam I ad Thessalonicenses. In: Migne J.-P. (Ed.) Patrologiæ Cursus Completus. Series Graeca. (Vol. 62 (11)). Paris: Venit Apud Editorem (in Greek).

10. Chrysostom J. (1905) Complete Works (Vol. 11). Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg Ecclesiastical Academy Press (Russian translation).

11. Cramer J.A. (Ed.) (1842) Catenæ in Sancti Pauli Epistolas ad Galatas, Ephesios, Philippenses, Colossenses, Thessalonicenses. Oxford: E Typographeo Academico (in Greek).

12. Dvoretskiy I.Kh. (1976) Latin-Russian Dictionary (2 nd ed.). Moscow: Russkiy yazyk (in Russian).

13. Garden F. (1878) A Dictionary of English Philosophical Terms. London: Rivingtons.

14. Eriugena J.S. (1995) Homily on the Prologue to the Gospel of St. John (V.V. Petrov, Trans.). Moscow: Y.A. Shichalin’s Greek-Latin Cabinet (in Latin and Russian).

15. Kirik T.A. (2007) Virtual Reality and Its Ontological Prototypes. Kurgan: Kurgan State University Press (in Russian).

16. Krämer H.J. (2014) Arete of Plato and Aristotle (D.V. Sklyadnev, Trans.). Saint Petersburg: IMHO-PRESS (Russian translation).

17. Lewis C.T. (1984) A Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

18. Niermeyer J.F. (1976) Mediae Latinitatis Lexicon Minus. A Medieval Latin–French/English Dictionary (Fasciculus 1). Leiden: E.J. Brill.

19. Liddell H.G. & Scott R. (1996) A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

20. Taratuta E.E. (2007) Philosophy of Virtual Reality. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University Press (in Russian).

21. Veysman A.D. (1899) Greek-Russian Dictionary (5 th ed.). Saint Petersburg (in Russian).

22. Zudilina N.V. (2018) On the Nature of the Mental/Psychic, Manifesting as a Power/Energy That Is Implemented in Circular/Vortex Motion, as a Possible Source of the Meaning of the Concept of “Virtual.” In: Days of Science of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University (Vol. 2, pp. 1387–1388 ). Simferopol: V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University Press (in Russian).

23. Zudilina N.V. (2019) Influence of the Meanings of the Greek Concept of “Ἀρετή” on the Meanings of the Latin Concept of “Virtus” as One of the Reasons for the Polysemanticity of the Concept of “Virtual” in the 20th–21st Centuries. Logos et Praxis. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 5–14 (in Russian).