Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

Martin Heidegger’s Black Notebooks: Existential History and Metapolitics

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-4-132-151

Abstract

Philosophers actively discuss Black Notebooks – Martin Heidegger’s philosophical notebooks. Their publication opened for researchers a new field in the concept of existential history. The Notebooks are a good example of how closely related philosophical thought and the political atmosphere of time can be. Heidegger witnessed events that caused him to be confused. He had certain ideas about the reorganization of a German university, the formation of “aristocracy of spirit,” which is why he became involved in the National Socialist Party. Of course, this period of his activity and work should be carefully analyzed by many historians of philosophy in order to have a broad and well-founded idea of the motives of one of the most influential thinkers of the 20th century, to realize the degree of solidarity with the policy of the Nazi party, and, most importantly, to grasp philosophical content in politically biased texts of those years. History knows examples when a philosopher, in his desire to influence reality, collaborated with government, but such collaboration hardly ever turned fruitful for his philosophical research. The article contains an analysis of Heidegger’s text as well as a review of contemporary discussion on the Black Notebooks. The author gives his assessment of the evolution of the political and philosophical views of Heidegger from 1931 to 1948. It can be concluded that Heidegger was never the ideologist of the Third Reich and his works must be considered primarily as the result of a philosophical comprehension of the events taken place in the world, in the country, in the academic sphere.

About the Author

Mariya B. Mitlyanskaya
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Mariya B. Mitlyanskaya – Master of Philosophy, postgraduate student of the Department of the History of Foreign Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University.

Moscow



References

1. Bourdieu P. (2018) The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger. Moscow: Praxis (Russian translation).

2. Falyov E.V. (2016) Black Notebooks and a New Round of Heidegger’s Trial. Filofskoe obrazovanie: Bulletin of the Inter-University Center of Russian Philosophy and Culture. No. 2, pp. 35–45 (in Russian).

3. Faye E. & Laruelle M. (Eds.) (2018) Heidegger, Black Notebooks and Russia. Moscow: Delo (Russian translation).

4. Fried G. (2000) Heidegger’s Polemos: From Being to Politics. New Have, CT: Yale University Press.

5. Gabriel M. (2015) The Nazi from an Ambush. Voprosy filosofii. No. 4, pp. 166–169 (Russian translation).

6. Heidegger M. (1998) Gesamtausgabe. III. Abteilung: Unveröffentlichte Abhandlungen Vorträge – Gedachtes. Band 69: Das die Geschichte des Seyns. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann (in German).

7. Heidegger M. (2015a) Gesamtausgabe. IV Abteilung: Hinweise und Aufzeichnungen. Band 94: Überlegungen II–VI (Schwarze Hefte 1931–1938). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann (in German).

8. Heidegger M. (2015b) Gesamtausgabe. IV Abteilung: Hinweise und Aufzeichnungen. Band 95: Überlegungen VII–XI (Schwarze Hefte 1938/39). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann (in German).

9. Heidegger M. (2015c) Gesamtausgabe. IV Abteilung: Hinweise und Aufzeichnungen. Band 96: Überlegungen XII–XV (Schwarze Hefte 1939–1941). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann (in German).

10. Heidegger M. (2015d) Gesamtausgabe. IV Abteilung: Hinweise und Aufzeichnungen. Band 97: Anmerkungen I–V. (Schwarze Hefte 1942–1948). Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann (in German).

11. Klemme Kh.F. (2016) Minority as Program. Experience of a Reasoning on Heidegger and His Critic Modern Times. Voprosy Filosofii. No. 7, pp. 56–62 (in Russian).

12. Koonz C. (2003) The Nazi Conscience. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press (Russian translation: Moscow: Ladomir, 2007).

13. Lenin V.I. (1970) Speech at the Session of Heads of Executive Committees of Moscow Region, delivered at October 15, 1920. In: Lenin V.I. Complete Works (Vol. 41, pp. 346–361). Moscow: Politizdat (in Russian).

14. Mikhailovsky A.V. (2017) On Some Features of the Russian Reception of Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy. Bulletin of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. No. 1, pp. 54–71 (in Russian).

15. Mikhailovsky A.V. (2018) Beginning of Black Notebooks: Martin Heidegger’s Esoteric Initiative. Soziologicheskoye obozrenie. Vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 62–86 (in Russian)

16. Mironov V.V. & Mironova D. (2016) Philosopher and Power: A Case of Heidegger. Voprosy filosofii. No. 7, pp. 21–38 (in Russian).

17. Mironov V.V. & Mironova D. (2018) Ein Knabe, der träumt, or Inebriation by Power. Logos. Vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 149–182 (in Russian)

18. Motroshilova N.V. (2014) Why the Publication of 94–96 Volumes of the Collected Works of M. Heidegger Became a Sensation? Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences. Retrieved from https://iphras.ru/94_96.htm (in Russian)

19. Motroshilova N.V. (2016) And Again on Black Notebooks of Martin Heidegger (on the Debate of Summer – Autumn 2015)]. Voprosy filosofii. No. 7, pp. 39‒55 (in Russian).

20. Rockmore T. (1992) On Heidegger’s Nazism and Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.


Review

For citations:


Mitlyanskaya M.B. Martin Heidegger’s Black Notebooks: Existential History and Metapolitics. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2020;63(4):132-151. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-4-132-151



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)