Digitalization and the Anthropodicy Problem in Andrei Platonov’s Works
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-5-53-66
Abstract
The article identifies the main features of the Russian writer Andrei Platonov’s (1899-1951) comprehension of the anthropological consequences of the radical social transformation during the years of the “Great Turn,” or “Great Break” (i.e., the years of Stalin’s reforms that started in 1929). Platonov’s evaluation is unique in its scale and depth. He was among the first authors to draw attention to the typological commonness of Soviet and German totalitarianisms. Their similarities are not only rooted in the design of the respective regimes. Vice versa, the design itself is generated by the possibilities of inhuman rationalistic activism in mass society. Platonov’s texts written in 1929-1934 were devoted, rather than to mass collectivism or political and socio-cultural reorganization, to anthropology and the possibility of reorganizing man, together with his cosmos. The main idea of these literary works is search for a universal way of human existence in general, including the living and the dead. In these texts, Platonov deeply conceived and felt the complete emptiness and inhumanity of doctrinaire rationalistic activism, when it is accepted as a practical maxim for the universal human will. This body of texts does not represent a dystopian view of a possible future, yet it relates the shock of an encounter with an unexpectedly ambiguous future and the author’s longing and suffering in his attempts tounderstand it. Such attempts lead to the need for a new anthropodicy as a justification for a human existence, notwithstanding man’s limitations and finiteness. In this respect, the results of Platonov’s reflections are extremely relevant in relation to the analysis of humanitarian factors and the consequences of currently ongoing digitalization of practically all spheres of life, as well as in terms of searching for new foundations of human life under these conditions. Platonov’s works turn out to be more relevant than the alarmism of the philosophers of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory and than the contemporary demonization by the conceptions of digital posthumanity and transhumanism. Platonov’s relevance is due to the depth of the topics and problems he raised, and their meaning is just beginning to be revealed today.
About the Author
Grigorii L. TulchinskiiRussian Federation
Grigorii L. Tulchinskii - D.Sc. in Philosophy, Honored Researcher of the Russian Federation, Professor, Saint Petersburg State University; Professor, National Research University Higher Schools of Economics (Saint Petersburg branch).
Saint PetersburgReferences
1. Bakhtin M.M. (2003) On the Philosophy of the Act. In: Bakthin M.M. Collected Works in 7 Vols. (Vol. 1, pp. 7-68). Moscow: Russkiye slovari (in Russian).
2. Boltanski L. & Chiapello E. (1999) Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard (in French).
3. Borisova I. (1989) On the Seven Winds (About Platonov’s Novel Juvenile Sea). In: Kogan A. (Ed.) Literature and Modernity. Issue 24-25: Articles on Literature of 1986-1987 (pp. 153-194). Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura (in Russian).
4. Burnham D. (1941) The Managerial Revolution: What is Happening in the World. New York: John Day.
5. Castro E.V. de. (2009) Cannibal Metaphysics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6. Bilas M. (1957) The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System. London: Thames and Hudson.
7. Galbraith J.K. (1967) The New Industrial State. Boston, MA Houghton Mifflin.
8. Hoffer E. (1951) The True Believer: Thoughts On The Nature Of Mass Movements. New York: Harper and Row.
9. Horkheimer M. & Adorno T.W. (1947) Dialektik der Aufklarung. Philo-sophische Fragmente. Amsterdam: Querido (in German).
10. Neretina S.S., Nickolsky S.F., & Porus V.N. (1991) Philosophical Anthropology of Andrei Platonov. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russian).
11. Platonov A.P. (1978) Chevengur (A. Olcott, Trans.) Ann Arbor: Ardis.
12. Platonov A.P. (1991) Garbage Wind. A Story. Stories. Journalism. Tallinn: Eestiraamat (in Russian).
13. Platonov A.P. (2008) Soul and Other Stories (R. Chandler, E. Chandler, A. Livingstone, O. Meerson, & E. Naiman, Trans.) New York: New York Review Books.
14. Platonov A.P. (2009) Soul and Other Stories (R. Chandler, E. Chandler, & O. Meerson, Trans.) New York: New York Review Books.
15. Poltavtseva N.G. (2011) Platonov and Lukach (From the History of Soviet Art of the 1930s). Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrebie. Vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 107-118 (in Russian).
16. Shubin L.A. (1987) Searches for the Meaning of a Separate and Common Existence: About A. Platonov. Works of Different Years. Moscow: Sovetskiy pisatel’ (in Russian).
17. Schweitzer A. (1923) The Decay and the Restoration of Civilization and Civilization and Ethics. London: A. & C. Black.
18. Toffler A. (1984) The Third Wave. New York: Bantam.
19. Tulchinskii G.L. (2018) Political Culture of Russia: Sources, Lessons, Prospects. Saint Petersburg: Aletheia (in Russian).
20. Voslensky M. (1984) Nomenklatura: Anatomy of the Soviet Ruling Class. London: The Bodley Head.
21. Zilbershteyn I.S. & Tager E.B. (Eds.) (1963) Gorky and Soviet Writers. Unpublished Correspondence. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences Press (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Tulchinskii G.L. Digitalization and the Anthropodicy Problem in Andrei Platonov’s Works. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2020;63(5):53-66. https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-5-53-66