The “Synthetic” Image of Jesus Christ in F.M. Dostoevsky’s Works and Its Origins in German Romantic Natural Philosophy

The articles analyzes the original concept of immortality, presented by F.M. Dostoevsky in a handwritten sketch written on April 16, 1864, the day after the death of the writer’s first wife. The authors argue that this concept was created under the influence of the ideas of German romantic natural philosophy, in particular G.T. Fechner’s work of The Book of Life After Death (1836). According to the pantheistic ideas of Dostoevsky and Fechner, every person after death continues to exist in the earthly world. Having lost a limited biological body in death, a person can get a more extensive “cosmic” body, covering significant areas of the material universe. His personal spirit continues to exist in mankind, and the degree of his influence depends on what kind of spiritual success he achieved during his lifetime. In the concept of Fechner and Dostoevsky, posthumous life can be very different: great personalities (Goethe, Shakespeare, Napoleon, etc.) acquire an even more significant being than during life, and they continue to influence humankind, which, developing in history, strives for an absolute “synthesis” -the merger of all people into an organic whole and at the same time the merger with the universe. Individuals who, during their lifetime, confined themselves to their selfish interests can even disappear. In this concept, God is defined as “universal Synthesis,” i.e., the goal of the world process and the final merging of everything with everything. Jesus Christ is understood as an absolute, perfect man who, after death, does not resurrect in his previous bodily form, but completely dissolves in humankind and acts as a force guiding it toward unity and synthesis with the material world.

1. Araujo S.F. (2019) Rescuing Fechner from Oblivion: Aesthetics between Psychophysics and Metaphysics (Fechner. Vorschule der Asthetik, edited with an introduction by Christian Allesch). European Yearbook of the History of Psychology. Vol. 5, pp. 177-180.

2. Askoldov S. (1918) Fechner’s Philosophy and Religion. Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii. Vol. 141-142, рр. 130-180 (in Russian).

3. Askoldov S. (1981) Religious and Ethical Significance of Dostoevsky. In: F.M. Dostoevsky 1881- 100 - 1981 (рр. 31-59). London: Overseas Publications Interchange (in Russian).

4. Chernichkina A.A. (2016) Natural Philosophy of German Romanticism: Culture and Philosophy. Metaphysics. No. 2, рр. 153-165 (in Russian).

5. Dostoevsky F.M. (1974) Demons. In: Dostoevsky F.M. The Complete Collected Works in 30 Volumes (Vol. 10). Leningrad: Nauka (in Russian).

6. Dostoevsky F.M. (1980) Notes of a Journalistic and Literary Critical Nature from Notebooks of 1860-1865. In: Dostoevsky F.M. The Complete Collected Works in 30 Volumes (Vol. 20, рр. 152-205). Leningrad: Nauka (in Russian).

7. Dostoevsky F.M. (1985) Letters of 1832-1859. In: Dostoevsky F.M. The Complete Collected Works in 30 Volumes (Vol. 28, book 1). Leningrad: Nauka (in Russian).

8. Engelman A. (2010) What Would Be Gustav Theodor Fechner Legacy for Psychology in the 21st Century? In: Toomela A. & Valsiner J. (Eds.) Methodological Thinking in Psychology: 60 Years Gone Astray? (pp. 261-266). Charlotte, NC: IAP.

9. Evlampiev I.I. (2012) The Philosophy of Man in the Works of F. Dostoevsky (From Early Works to The Brothers Karamazov). Saint Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy Press (in Russian).

10. Evlampiev I.I. (2016) Hypertext of the Idea of Immortality in the Works of Dostoevsky. In: Tichomirov B.N. (Ed.) Dostoevsky and World Culture. Almanac no. 34 (рр. 195-218). Saint Petersburg: Serebryanyy vek (in Russian).

11. Fechner G.T. (1836) Das Buchlein vom Leben nach dem Tode. Dresden: Grimmer (Russian translations in: Hermeticism, Magic, Natural Philosophy in the European Culture of the 13th-19th Сenturies. Moscow: Kanon+, 1999, рр. 525-584).

12. Fechner G.T. (1851) Zend-Avesta, oder uber die Dinge des Himmels und des Jenseits; vom Standpunkt der Naturbetrachtung. Leipzig: Voss (in German).

13. Hawking S.L. (2011) William James, Gustav Fechner, and Early Psychophysics. Frontiers in Physiology. Vol. 2, no. 68.

14. Heidelberger M. (2004) Nature from Within: Gustav Theodor Fechner and His Philosophical Worldview. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

15. Robinson D.K. (2019) Fechner’s Psychophysics and His Scientific Program. Boletim. Vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 58-74.

16. Romand D. (2012) Fechner as a Pioneering Theorist of Unconscious Cognition. Consciousness and Cognition. Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 562-572.

17. Woodward W.R. (2018) Fechner (1801-1887) For and In Psychology: Part I. Archives of Psychology. Vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1-21.

18. Vrangel A.E. (1990) From “Memoirs of F.M. Dostoevsky in Siberia”. In: Dolinin A.S. (Comp.) F.M. Dostoevsky in the Memoirs of His Contemporaries (Vols. 1-2; Vol. 1, рр. 345-368). Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura (in Russian).