Max Weber on Science, in the Context of Our Days Thinking

Max Weber analyzes the science of the Modern Period. The revolution in physics at the beginning of the 20^th century, the creation of quantum mechanics bring to the fore another type of scientific thinking. It is important to note that past knowledge in this case is not refuted, not destroyed, it becomes marginal and enters into communication with its competitor. It is this type of communication with Weber’s philosophy of scientific thinking that helps us to understand its specificity. According to Weber, new knowledge is derived from the previous one, refuting its truth. On this basis, Weber writes that science is different from the art, where the created works retain their significance regardless of the time when they were created. For modern science the predecessor is necessary as another, without which not any communication is possible. Classical science, about which Weber writes, is necessary and continues to function. Satisfying the reemerging needs of society, it can detect previously hidden possibilities and, at the same time, encourage new scientific thinking to strengthen its position.The concept of revolution disappears gradually from the works on science. Instead, sociological concepts such as an innovation center or a technopark that combine simultaneously changes in the logic of knowledge and in the technical equipment of society are becoming popular. Logical and social characteristics of science are combined, the boundary between them becomes less noticeable. If in the era of classics the artificial world surrounding man was built on the basis of the laws of nature, now it is being created on the basis of the laws of thinking. For Weber, this world was silent and dead, this is what classical science testified to. Now the world around us is endowed with artificial intelligence, and we must be able to communicate with it. To understand Weber, it is necessary to establish contact with the world of classics, and not to try to destroy it and to declare it worthless.

1. Berry D.V. (2014) The Social Epistemologies of Software. In: Collier J.H. (Ed.) On Twenty-Five Years of Social Epistemology: A Way Forward (pp. 123–143). London: Routledge.

2. Bibler V.S. (1991) From the Wissenschaftslehre to the Logic of Culture. Two Philosophical Introductions in the Twenty First Century , Moscow: Politizdat (in Russian).

3. Born M. (1963) Physics in My Generation. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoy literatury. (Russian translation).

4. Fuller S. (2002) Social Epistemology (2nd ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

5. Fuller S. & Lipinska V. (2014) The Proactionary Imperative: A Foundation for Transhumanism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

6. Goldman A. (1999) Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

7. Goldman A. (2010) Why Social Epistemology is Real Epistemology. In: Haddock A., Millar A., & Pritchard D. (Eds.) Social Epistemology (pp. 1–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

8. Kasavin I.T. (2008) Text. Discourse. Context. Introduction to Social Epistemology of Language. Moscow: Alfa-M (in Russian).

9. Kasavin I.T. (2013) Social Epistemology. Basic and Applied Problems. Moscow: Alfa-M (in Russian).

10. Kuhn T. (1977) Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Moscow: Nauka (Russian translation).

11. Mamardashvili M. (1996) Arrow of Cognition: Sketches of Natural-Historical Epistemology. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kul’tury (in Russian).

12. Markova L. (2016) Turn in Research Social Nature of Scientific Knowledge. Voprosy filosofii. No. 4, pp. 182–193 (in Russian).

13. Markova L. (2017) Other Science, in Result – a New Science Policy. Voprosy filosofii. No. 12, pp. 102–114 (in Russian).

14. Prigogine I. & Stengers I. (1986) Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Moscow: Progress (Russian translation).

15. Weber M. (1990a) Politics as a Vocation and Profession. In: Weber M. Selected Works. Moscow: Progress (in Russian).

16. Weber M. (1990b) Science as a Vocation and Profession. In: Weber M. Selected Works. Moscow: Progress (in Russian).