Georg Simmel and the Idea of Moral Law

In the article, I analyze Georg Simmel’s essay on individual law and summarize his criticism of the concept of a universal moral law, which was developed by Immanuel Kant. Simmel identifies two ways of conceptualizing the concept of a moral law: as universal, referring to the regulation of the actions of all rational beings, and as individual, including a specific acting person in his integrity and connection with the world, which is, at the same time, absolute only for him. Kant became the personification of the first method for Simmel; Simmel put forward the second method as an alternative to the first. The central characteristic of law for Simmel is its integrity and individuality, not rationality and universality. If Kant understands the moral law through a distraction from personal characteristics and inclinations in favor of impersonal norms that operate for all rational beings, then, for Simmel, the moral law manifests itself as an integral and individual human act, in which the flow of life manifests itself in the whole. Simmel insists that the idea of Kant’s universal law overlooks the very es-sence of moral obligation, which can only be individual, since only in an individual form life manifests itself – a single source of both the real and the proper. The article ends with a criticism of Simmel’s example of an individual law, which, as I show, not only contradicts a number of Simmel’s statements made earlier, but also demonstrates the undeveloped nature of his concept as a whole, namely: Simmel’s insensitivity to the distinction between integrity and totality as well as disregard for the figure of the Other.

1. Amat M. (2017) Simmel’s Law of the Individual: A Relational Idea of Culture. Simmel Studies. Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 41–72.

2. Bakhtin M.M. (2003) On the Philosophy of an Act. In: Bakhtin M.M. Collected Works in 7 Vols. (Vol. 1, pp. 7–68). Moscow: Russikie slovari (in Russian).

3. Davydov Y.M. (1996) Max Weber and Mikhail Bakhtin. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. No. 10, pp. 3–15 (in Russian).

4. Fuchs-Heinritz W. (2018) Das individuelle Gesetz. In: R. Lautmann & H. Wienold (Eds.). Georg Simmel und das Leben in der Gegenwart (pp. 363–379). Wiesbaden: Springer (in German).

5. Gangas S. (2004) Axiological and Normative Dimensions in Georg Simmel’s Philosophy and Sociology: A Dialectical Interpretation. History of the Human Sciences. Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 17–44.

6. Jankelevitch V. (1925) Georg Simmel. Philosophie de la vie. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale. Vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 213–257 (in French).

7. Joas H. (2013) The Genesis of Values. Saint Petersburgh: Aletheia (Russian translation).

8. Hoeres P. (2012) Krieg der Philosophen. Paderborn: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh (in German).

9. Kron T. (2001) Moralische Individualität. Eine Kritik der postmodernen Ethik von Zygmunt Bauman und ihrer soziologischen Implikationen für eine soziale Ordnung durch Individualisierung. Opladen: Leske + Budrich (in German).

10. Kyslan P. (2016) What is Culture? Kant and Simmel. International Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 158–166.

11. Lee M. & Silver D. (2012) Simmel’s Law of the Individual and the Ethics of the Relational Self. Theory, Culture & Society. Vol. 29, no. 7–8, pp. 124–145.

12. Lehtonen T-K. & Pyyhtinen O. (2008) On Simmel’s Conception of Philosophy. Continental Philosophy Review. Vol. 41. No. 3, pp. 301–322.

13. Levinas E. (1957) La philosophie et l’idée de l’Infini. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale. Vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 241–253.

14. Lotter M.S. (2000) Das individuelle Gesetz. Zu Simmels Kritik an der Lebensfremdheit der kantischen Moralphilosophie. Kant-Studien. Vol. 91, pp. 178–203.

15. Nielsen G.M. (2002) The Norms of Answerability. Social Theory Between Bakhtin and Habermas. New York: State University of New York Press.

16. Podoksik E. (2016) Neo-Kantianism and Georg Simmel’s Interpretation of Kant. Modern Intellectual History. Vol. 13, no 3, pp. 597–622.

17. Pyyhtinen O. (2010) Simmel and ‘the Social’. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

18. Rickert H. (1998) The Philosophy of Life. Kiev: Nika-Centre (in Russian).

19. Rogers E.M. (1999) Georg Simmel’s Concept of the Stranger and Intercultural Communication Research. Communication Theory. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 58–74.

20. Serra F. (2000) Libertad y ley en Simmel. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas. Vol. 89, no 1, pp. 251–267.

21. Simmel G. (1904) Einleitung in die Moralwissenschaft. Eine Kritik der ethischen Grundbegriffe. Stuttgart und Berlin: J.G. Gotta’sche Bichhandlung Nachfolger.

22. Simmel G. (1913) Das individuelle Gesetz. Ein Versuch über das Problem der Ethik. Logos. Vol. 4, pp. 117–160.

23. Simmel G. (1922) Lebensanschauung. Vier metaphysische Kapitel. München und Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot.

24. Simmel G. (1996a) Kant. In: Simmel G. Selected Works (Vol. 1. pp. 7–157). Moscow: Yurist (Russian translation).

25. Simmel G. (1996b) The View of Life: Four Metaphysical Essays. In: Simmel G. Selected Works (Vol. 2. pp. 7–185). Moscow: Yurist (Russian translation).

26. Simmel G. (2006) The Individual Law. In: Simmel G. Selected Works (pp. 11–60). Kiev: Nika-Tsentr (in Russian).

27. Vandenberghe F. (2000) La loi individuelle: une éthique nietzschéo-bergsonienne. Simmel Studies. Vol. 10. No. 2, pp. 169–178 (in French)