Is “Analytic Philosophy” a Philosophy?

The article discusses the issue of the nature of analytic philosophy. It is shown that in the 1920s–1940s it was a certain philosophical school, whose representatives were united by some initial principles. Analytic philosophers saw the main task of philosophy in the analysis of the language of natural sciences, in establishing logical connections between scientific propositions, in the empirical substantiation of scientific theories and in the elimination of speculative concepts and proposals from the language of science. The tool for such analysis was the mathematical logic created at the beginning of the 20^th century by G. Frege, A.N. Whitehead, B. Russell. Another characteristic feature of the analytic tradition was a negative attitude toward philosophical speculation. Adherents of this tradition believed that philosophy does not provide knowledge about the world, therefore, it is not a science. Analytic philosophers have made a significant contribution to the methodology of scientific knowledge, offering an accurate description of the hypothetical-deductive structure of scientific theory, methods of scientific explanation and prediction, verification, confirmation and refutation of scientific statements. In the late 1930s, most of the analytic philosophers emigrated to England and the United States. The analytic movement is gradually losing its integrity and loses the features of a philosophical school. There is a rejection of mathematical logic as the main means of analysis, the connection with the natural sciences has been lost. In the second half of the 20th century, analytic philosophy from a specific philosophical school turns into a certain style of thinking of the philosophers of various philosophical research areas and orientations.

1. Carnap R. (2007) The Old and the New Logic. In: Erkenntnis Journal. Selected Articles (pp. 105–119). Moscow: Idea-Press (Russian translation).

2. Carnap R., Hahn H., Neurath O. (2007) The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle. In: Erkenntnis Journal. Selected Articles (pp. 13–26). Moscow: Idea-Press (Russian translation).

3. Gryaznov A.F. (1998) Introduction. In: Gryaznov A.F. (Ed.) Analytical Philosophy: Formation and Development (pp. 5–16). Moscow: Dom intellektual’noy knigi, Progress-Traditisiya (in Russian).

4. Makeeva L.B. (2019) Analytic Philosophy as a Historical and Philosophical Phenomenon. The Philosophy Journal. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 130−143 (in Russian).

5. Nikiforov A.L. (2018) Not All That Glitters Is Gold. The Philosophy Journal. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 160−172 (in Russian).

6. Rorty R. (1998) Philosophy in America Today. In: Gryaznov A.F. (Ed.) Analytical Philosophy: Formation and Development (pp. 433–453). Moscow: Dom intellektual’noy knigi, Progress-Traditisiya (Russian translation).

7. Schlick M. (1999) The Turning Point in Philosophy. In: Erkenntnis Journal. Selected Articles (pp. 98–104). Moscow: Idea-Press (Russian translation).

8. Shokhin V.K. (2015) Analytic Philosophy: Some Unbeaten Paths. The Philosophy Journal. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 16−27 (in Russian).

9. Stroud B. (1998) Analytic Philosophy and Metaphysics. In: Gryaznov A.F. (Ed.) Analytical Philosophy: Formation and Development (pp. 510–525). Moscow: Dom intellektual’noy knigi, Progress-Traditisiya (Russian translation).

10. Tselishchev V.V. (2018) Analytical Philosophy and Revisionism without Limits. The Philosophical Journal. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 142–143 (Russian translation).