Musical Modus: Perspectives for Ontological Interpretation
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-12-26-46
Abstract
The article discusses a methodological position that allows interpreting modes and, fist of all, musical modes as cosmographic and ethical objects without losing the approach to them as musical phenomena proper. The study is based on musical theoretical data relating to the period of Classical antiquity and the Middle Ages, as well as on the author's concept of modal ontology and the interpretation of modus as artistic content, developed by E.V. Nazaikinsky. In order to reveal the ontological prerequisites for the unity of the musical modus with a cosmographic or ethical phenomenon, the author analyzes the ancient Chinese system of tones lü, Indian ragas, ancient tetrachords, the voices of the Russian Orthodox znamenny chant. The features of the correspondence of these musical phenomena to the periods of the year or day, elements, archetypal states of the human spirit, social laws are revealed. In the course of the analysis, the question is formulated about the nature of the connection between musical modes and non-musical reality: was it exclusively conventional, established by virtue of tradition, or did it have other, essential reasons? The search for unconventional foundations of the unity of musical modes with natural and socio-ethical phenomena leads to its ontological interpretation. The relevance of this research method is argued in the process of critical analysis of the semiotic approach to musical modes as references or conventional signs of objects. It also demonstrates the unproductiveness of the psychoemotional interpretation of musical modes as stimuli that cause certain emotional states. The result of the research is the development of a specific musical-ontological approach based on the methodology of modal analysis. This analysis aims at a syncretic understanding of unity. In the light of this approach, it was concluded that the concept of musical modus not only clarifies the rhythmic and harmonic laws of the musical language, but also embodies the interconnection of the phenomena of music, human spirit, nature, and space.
About the Author
Anastasia A. MedovaRussian Federation
Anastasia A. Medova – D.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor, Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology; Professor, Deparment of Music and Art Education, Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P. Astafyev.
Krasnoyarsk.
References
1. Ascott R. (2005) Syncretic Reality: Art, Process, and Potentiality. Drain Magazine. Vol. 2, no. 2.
2. Bershadskaya T.S. (2008) Misunderstanding, Becoming a Tradition. Muzykal’naya akademiya. No. 1, pp. 175-178 (in Russian).
3. Cherkasova N.L. (1993) Raga and its Place in Indian music Culture. Essays. Moscow: Konservatoriya (in Russian).
4. Chung A.J. (2019) What is Musical Meaning? Theorizing Music as Performative Utterance. Music Theory Online. Vol. 25, no. 1.
5. Gertsman E. (1986) Classical Ancient Musical Thinking. Leningrad: Muzyka (in Russian).
6. Kaufmann W. (1968) The Ragas of North India. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7. Klujev A.S. (2010) Ontology of Music (2nd ed.). - Saint Petersburg: Petropolis (in Russian).
8. Langleben M.M. (1972) On Some Musical Systems and Musical Notations of Classical Antiquity. In: Meletinsky E.M. (Ed.) Early Forms of Art (pp. 429-443). Moscow: Iskusstvo (in Russian).
9. Lotman Y.M. (1998) On Art. Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPb (in Russian).
10. Meshherina E.G. (2008) The Musical Culture of Medieval Russia. Moscow: Kanon+ (in Russian).
11. Moskva Yu. (2007) The Main Categories of Modality of Gregorian Choral. Muzykal’naya akademiya. No. 2, pp. 162-173 (in Russian).
12. Mеdova A.A. (2016) Ontology of Modality (dissertation). Krasnoyarsk (in Russian).
13. Nazaykinsky E. (1982) The Logic of Musical Composition. Moscow: Muzyka (in Russian).
14. Ortony A. & Turner T.J. (1990) What's Basic about Basic Emotions? Psychological Review. Vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 315-331.
15. Perelomov L.S. (2001) Analects of Confucius. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura (in Russian).
16. Ramos D., Bueno J.L.O., & Bigand E. (2011) Manipulating Greek Musical Modes and Tempo Affects Perceived Musical Emotion in Musicians and Nonmusicians. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. Vol. 44, no 2, pp. 165-172.
17. Rao S. & van der Meer W. (2010) The Construction, Reconstruction, and Deconstruction of Shruti. In: Bor J., Delvoye F., Harvey J., & te Nijenhuis E. (Eds.) Hindustani Music: Thirteenth to Twentieth Centuries (pp. 673-696). New Delhi: Manohar, 2010.
18. Zoltai D. (1977) Ethos and Affect. The History of Philosophical Musical Aesthetics from Generation to Hegel. Moscow: Progress (Russian translation).
Review
For citations:
Medova A.A. Musical Modus: Perspectives for Ontological Interpretation. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2020;63(12):26-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-12-26-46