The Perception of Time in European and Chinese Cultures
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-12-47-67
Abstract
The article provides a comparative analysis of the perception of time in Europe and China. Time is considered as one of the fundamentals of mentality. The author presents the specifics of mythological time, distinguishing sacred and profane times and analyzing the correlation between time, space, things, and their repetition. European logos time, which becomes mainstream in Modern Times, is examined. The article describes the postmodern period that took shape in the 20th and early 21st centuries. The formation and contemporary image of time in China is traced in detail. This perception of time suddenly turns out to be the most relevant to today’s needs: in Chinese culture, time and space are closely connected, linearity is combined with cyclicality, involvement is combined with distancing, immovability and the ability to wait for the right moment – with an instant reaction. In Chinese culture, innovations are introduced under the guise of tradition (repetition), and activism, which has always been especially emphasized as the specificity of the modern Europe, as it turns out, is the most important characteristic of the Chinese (in contrast to traditional European ideas about Chinese passivity). Under modern “network” conditions, the substantial understanding of things, which is characteristic of European culture, has given way to a networking perception, which is specific to the Chinese (things as a network, a person as a plurality). This is a network in which interactions are carried out simultaneously and in different directions. By itself, a comparative analysis of mentalities yields important results and allows to draw far-reaching conclusions that are essential for understanding both the European and Chinese visions of the world. In conclusion, it becomes clearer what features of the Chinese mentality made possible not only the entry of China into the group of developed countries but also its transformation into one of the leaders among the world powers.
About the Author
Sergey A. ProsekovRussian Federation
Sergey A. Prosekov – Ph.D. in Philosophy, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications, Associate Professor of the Department of Humanities, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation.
Moscow.
References
1. Eliade M. (1994) Das heilige unddas Profane. Vom Wesen des Religiosen. Hamburg: Rowohlt (Russian translation: Moscow: Moscow University Press).
2. Freydenberg O.M. (1978) The Myth and Literature of Classical Antiquity. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
3. Girenok F.I. (2008) Exodus to the Art of Archaeo-Avant-Garde. In: Girenok F.I. Pleasure of Thinking Differently (pp. 131-141). Moscow: Akademicheskiy proyekt (in Russian).
4. Girenok F.I. (2014) Clip Consciousness. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proyekt (in Russian).
5. Knabe G.S. (1999) Russian Classical Antiquity: Content, Role, and Fate of the Ancient Population in the Culture of Russia. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities Press (in Russian).
6. Le Goff J. (2014) Faut-il vraiment decouper l'histoire en tranches? Paris: Le Seuil (Russian translation: Saint Petersburg: Evraziya, 2018).
7. Lian Hua. (2015) Veterans of the Chinese Communist Party demand to reconsider the attitude towards Mao Zedong. Epoch Times Russia. Retrieved from https://www.epochtimes.ru/veterany-kompartii-kitaya-trebuyut-peresmotret-otnoshenie-k-mao-tszedunu-98991537/ (in Russian).
8. Malyavin V.V. (1988) Language of the Heart: Aphorism and Chinese Tradition. In: Malyavin (Comp. & Trans.) Aphorisms of the Old China (pp. 5-38). Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
9. Maslov A.A. (2005) China: Bells in the Dust of the Wanderings of the Magician and the Intellectual (2nd ed.). Moscow: Aletheia (in Russian).
10. McLuhan M. (1962) The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press (Russian translation: Kiev: Nika-Tsentr, 2003).
11. McLuhan M. (1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw Hill (Russian transaslation: Moscow: Kanon-press-Ts; Zhukovsky: Kuchkovo pole, 2003).
12. Osborne R. (2006) Civilization: A New history of the Western World. London: Jonathan Cape (Russian translation: Moscow: AST, 2018).
13. Prokhorova N.V. (2014) On the Feeling of the Rhythm of Time by the Chinese. In: Blyumkhen S.I. (Ed.) Society and State in China: 37th Scientific Conference. On the 100th Anniversary of the Birth of L.I. Duman (pp. 161-167). Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura (in Russian).
14. Speshnev N.A. (2011) Chinese People. Features of the National Psychology of Time. Saint Petersburg: Karo (in Russian).
15. Toffler A. (1980) The Third Wave. New York: Bantam Books (Russian translation: Moscow: AST, 2004).
16. Whitrow G.J. (1961) The Natural Philosophy of Time. London: Thomas Nelson & Sons (Russian translation: Moscow: Progress, 1964).
17. Fedotova V.G. (2014) Modernization and Tradition. znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. No. 2, pp. 80-91 (in Russian).
18. Yakovleva A.M. (1981) Mythological Roots of Folklore Thinking: Space, Time, Existence. Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series 7: Philosophy. No. 6, pp. 56-65 (in Russian).
19. Yakovleva A.M. (2014) Clip Reading: Text as a Simulacrum Image. In: Dukov E.V. (Ed.) Television Broadcasting Science (Issue 11, pp. 197-228). Moscow: M.A. Litovchin Humanitarian Institute of Television and Radio Broadcasting (in Russian).
20. Yatsyk S. (2015) Is It Worth Cutting History into Pieces? (Book review: Le Goff J. Faut-il vraiment decouper l'histoire en tranches? P., 2014). Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. No. 1, pp. 349-360 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Prosekov S.A. The Perception of Time in European and Chinese Cultures. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2020;63(12):47-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-12-47-67