Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

The Concept and Formula of Happiness: Historical and Contemporary Criteria

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-12-68-80

Abstract

The article presents a historical and philosophical analysis of happiness as a socio-cultural phenomenon, considers the proposed criteria and components of the state of happiness as well as proposes the author's integrative definition of happiness. The relevance of this study is determined by the importance of the actual humanitarian indicators in assessing socio-political progress. As a result of the analysis of how the concept of happiness was historically formed and developed, it was shown that (a) the concept of happiness became widespread in the humanitarian discourse relatively late, (b) its predecessors are the ancient Greek concepts of agathon (the good) and eudaimonia (welfare, prosperity, supreme good), (c) in Western European philosophy, the understanding of good is contradictory and includes a wide range of meanings, from utilitarian to axiological, (d) the content of the concept of happiness includes two aspects: one is in the person's power and the other is determined by external factors. The article analyzes modern theories of happiness and feelings of life satisfaction as well as scientific studies of the components of the state of happiness. As a result of the analysis of these approaches, it is shown that in most modern studies, the emphasis in understanding happiness is placed on either socio-biological or socioeconomic factors. The author examines the criteria for the state of happiness. The author quotes other researchers and proposes certain steps as an algorithm for determining happiness, i.e., a formula for happiness. The importance of harmony of the following components of the human personality and life is substantiated: the belief system (and living in accordance with one's beliefs), abilities (and the possibility of their implementation in professional, cognitive activity), geographical location of residence, as well as social circle (and the balance of socio-psychological proximity and distancing).

About the Author

Galina I. Kolesnikova
M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky Donetsk National University of Economics and Trade

Galina I. Kolesnikova – D.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor, Department Philosophy, M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky Donetsk National University of Economics and Trade.
Donetsk



References

1. Annas J. (2004) Happiness as Achievement. Daedalus. Vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 44-51.

2. Berdyaev N.A. (1937) The Destiny of Man. London: G. Bless.

3. De Neve J.-E. (2011) Functional Polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) in the Serotonin Transporter Gene is Associated with Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from a US Nationally Representative Sample. Journal of human Genetics. Vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 456-459.

4. Diener E. (1984) Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 542-575.

5. Fideler D.R. (1987) Introduction. In: Guthrie K.S.(Comp. & Trans.) The Pythagorean Sourcebook and Library (pp. 19-54). Grand Rapids, MI: Phanes Press.

6. Goran V.P. (1990) Ancient Greek Mythologeme of Fate. Novosibirsk: Nauka, Siberian Branch (in Russian).

7. Hartmann N. (1926) Ethik. Berlin: de Gruyter (in German).

8. Inge W.R. (1921) Religion. In: Livingstone R.W. (Ed.) The Legacy of Greece (pp. 25-56). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

9. Ioseliani A.D. (2014) Ecological Consciousness and Religious Values in the Scriptures of the East. Filsofia i obshchestvo. No. 3, pp. 104-118 (in Russian).

10. Kolesnikova G.I. (2017) Social Policy of Russia: The Concept of Personality Development in the 21st Century. Mezhdunarodny nauchny zhurnal. Series: humanities. No. 3. pp. 102-107.

11. Kolesnikova G.I. (2018) The Conception of Personality Development: Social and Economic Mechanisms. In: Bodrunov S.D. (Ed.) For-sight “Russia”: New Industrial Society. Reset: Collection of Reports of the St. Petersburg International Economic Congress (SPEC-20017) (Vol. 2, pp. 518-526). Saint Petersburg: Institute for New Industrial Development (in Russian).

12. Kolesnikova G.I. (2020) Paradoxes of Comprehension of the Concepts “the Man” and “a Man” in the History of Civilization. Arkhont. Vol. 6, pp. 13-21 (in Russian).

13. Kozlova K.S. (2012) The Category of Good: From Philosophical and Ethical to Economic and Political and Legal Meanings. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. No. 3, pp. 99-103 (in Russian).

14. Lambert C. (2007) The Science of Happiness. harvard Magazine. No. 1, pp. 26-30, 94. Retrieved from https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2007/01/the-science-of-happiness.html

15. Lavrova N.A. (2012) The Economy of Happiness. Bulletin of the Saratov State Social and Economic University. No. 4, pp. 31-35.

16. Maslow A.H. (1943) A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review. Vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 370-396.

17. Mesyats S.V. (2012) Plato's Philebus on the One, Many and the Middle (a Note on 14c-18d). Schole. Vol. 6. no. 2, pp. 323-339 (in Russian).

18. Moore G.E. (1903) Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press.

19. Oishi S., Graham J., Kesebir S., & Galinha I.C. (2013) Concepts of Happiness Across Time and Cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Vol 39, no. 5, pp. 559-577.

20. Rozanov V.V. (1994) The Purpose of human Life. Moscow: Progress-Kul'tura (in Russian).

21. Rutledge R.B., Skandali N., Dayan P., & Dolan R.J. (2014) A Computational and Neural Model of Momentary Subjective Well-Being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 111, no. 33, pp. 12252-12257.

22. Rutledge R.B., De Berker A.O., Espenhahn S., Dayan P., & Dolan R.J. (2016) The Social Contingency of Momentary Subjective Well-Being. Nature Communications. Vol. 7, article no. 11825.

23. Scheler M. (1916) Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik: neuer Versuch der Grundlegung eines ethischen Personalismus. Halle (Saale): M. Niemeyer (in German).

24. Seligman M.E.P. (2002) Authentic happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. New York: Atria.

25. Seregin A.V. (2017) Instrumentalism and Inclusivism in Aristotle's Interpretation of “External” Goods (on EN 1099a24-b7). Ethical Thought. Vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 73-90 (in Russian).

26. Shakhbanova M.M., Kolesnikova G.I., Gryshai V.N., Abramov M.A., Skvortsov D.V., Kurnosenko. A.A., & Korsakov A.N. Factors of Intolerance Formation in Modern Russian Society. Dilemas contemporaneos: Education, PoHtica y Valores. Vol. 6, no. S3, article no. 29.

27. Shmatova Y.E. & Morev M.V. (2015) Measuring the Level of Happiness: Review of Russian and Foreign Studies. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye pere-meny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz. No. 3, pp. 141-162 (in Russian)

28. Solovyov V.S. (1989) Russian national ideal (on the N.Ya. Grott's Article in Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii). In: Solovyov V.S. Works in 2 Vols. (Vol. 2, pp. 286-295). Moscow: Pravda (in Russian).

29. Tatarkiewicz W. (1981) On happiness and Perfection of Man. Moscow: Progress (Russian translation).

30. Vyazinkin A.Y. (2012) Personal Happiness and the “Formula for life” as the Basic Concepts of N.K. Mikhailovsky's Theory of Struggle for Individuality. Tomsk State University Journal. No. 4, pp. 287-282.

31. Veenhoven R. & Vergunst F. (2014) The Easterlin Illusion: Economic Growth Does Go with Greater Happiness. International Journal of happiness and Development. Vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 311-343.

32. Verma R. (2019) The Eight Manifestations of GNH: Multiple Meanings of a Development Alternative. Journal of Bhutan Studies. Vol. 41, pp. 1-31.


Review

For citations:


Kolesnikova G.I. The Concept and Formula of Happiness: Historical and Contemporary Criteria. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2020;63(12):68-80. https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-12-68-80



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)