Kathāvatthu (“Points of Controversy”) as a Primary Source of Early Buddhist Philosophy
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-12-81-101
Abstract
This article focuses on the under-researched Buddhist text Kathāvatthu (“Points of Controversy”) and aims to better determine its place within Indian philosophy. We consider how the text was compiled, its contents, and main characteristics (such as its genre, its classification lists – mātika). To understand some of those characteristics, we suggest viewing them as shared with the whole Pali Canon (a large body of heterogeneous texts, of which the Kathāvatthu is part). This article also illustrates the issues of translating religious and philosophical texts from the Pāli language. Particularly, we highlight that the Kathāvatthu belongs to the part of Pāli Canon known as the Abhidhamma Piṭaka, and consider how this influences the philosophical discourse presented in this text. We analyze the historical and philosophical content of the Kathāvatthu. We argue that such content of this work is consistently revealed in the discussion of issues controversial for the schools of Early Buddhism. At the beginning of the text, there are the most significant questions for Early Buddhism (about the subject (pudgala), about the one who has reached perfection – arhat). As we get closer to the end of the text, the importance of the issues discussed diminishes. Its final part contains the latest questions. The discussion in each question depends on the logical method of the eight refutations, the use of lists (mātika), and the position of the Theravada school to which the final version of the text belongs. In the article, special attention is paid to the determination of the Kathāvatthu genre. We conclude that the genre of this work can be considered as a unique example of religious and philosophical dialogue in Early Buddhist literature.
About the Author
Anastasiya V. LozhkinaRussian Federation
Anastasiya V. Lozhkina – Ph.D. in Philosophy, Junior Research Fellow, Department of Oriental Philosophies, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Moscow.
References
1. Aung S.Z. & Rhys-Davids C.A.F. (Eds. & Trans.) Points of Controversy or Subjects of Discourse. London: Pali Text Society.
2. Barrua A. (2006) Kathavatthu. A Critical & Philosophical Study. Delhi: New Bharatiya Book.
3. Bastow D. (1996) Debates on the Time in the Kathavatthu. Buddhist Studies Review. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 109-133.
4. Bhattacharya A. (2010) Kathavatthu on the Development of the Buddhist Doctrine and Sects (thesis). Kolkata: University of Calcutta.
5. Dermott J. P. (1989) The Kathavatthu Niyama Debates. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 139-149.
6. Dubbe S.N. (2005) Kathavatthu: A Unique Pali Text. Studies in humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1-18.
7. Furtseva L.R. (1990) Schools of Early Buddhism in Kushan Epoch (According the Epigraphic Data) (dissertation). Moscow: RAS Institute of Studies (in Russian).
8. Ganeri J. (2001) Argumentation, Dialogue and the Kathavatthu. Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 485-493.
9. Kathavatthu-sutta. Themes for Discussions. (2013) In: Theravada.ru Buddist Center. Retrieved from http://www.theravada.ru/Teaching/Canon/Suttanta/Texts/an3_67-kathavatthu-sutta-sv.htm (Russian translation).
10. Lozhkina A.V. (2017) On the Emergence of Ancient Indian Logic: Interpreting the “Eight Refutations” Concept as Presented in the Kathavatthu. In: Vertogradova VV. (Ed.) India - Tibet: Text and Intertext in Culture. George N. Roerich Annual International Conference at the Institute of Oriental Studies 2012-2015 (pp. 152-163). Moscow: LSR Publishing House (in Russian).
11. Lozhkina A.V. (2018) Classification Lists (matika / matrka) in Early Buddhism. The Philosophy Journal. Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 56-71 (in Russian).
12. Lozhkina A.V. (2019a) Talk on the Subject-pudgala' as Philosophy-Religious Dialogue in the Pali Canon (‘Kathavatthu I.1') (dissertation). Moscow: RAS Institute of Philosophy (in Russian).
13. Lozhkina A.V. (2019b) The Notion of ‘Schools' (nikaya, acaryavada) in Early Buddhism. history of philosophy. Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 5-18 (in Russian).
14. Lozhkina A.V. (2021) Ethic and Ontology in Theravada Buddhism: Talks on Ethically Good and Bad Deeds in Kathavatthu I.1.200-I.1.216. Philosophy of Religion: Analytic Researches. Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 107‒124 (in Russian).
15. Norman K.R. (1983) Pali Literature: Including the Canonical Literatire in Prakrit and Sanskrit of All the hmayana Schools of Buddhism. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
16. Nyanatiloka. (1988) Buddhist Dictionary. Manual of Buddhist Terms & Doctrines (4th ed.; Nyanaponika, Ed. ). Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.
17. Nyanatiloka M. (2007) Guide through the Abhdhamma Pitaka. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.
18. Pathama-kathavatthu-sutta (2013) In: Theravada.ru Buddist Center Retrieved from http://www.theravada.ru/Teaching/Canon/Suttanta/Texts/an10_69-pathama-kathavatthu-sutta-sv.htm (Russian translation).
19. Points of Controversy… 1915 – Points of Controversy or Subjects of Discourse / tr. by S.Z. Aung, С.A.F. Rhys Davids. – London: Pāli Text Society, 1915.
20. Rhys Davids T.W. & Stede W. (Eds.) (1921) The Pali Text Society's Pali-English Dictionary. London: Pali Text Society.
21. Ronkin N. (2005) Early Buddhist Metaphysics. The Making a Philosophical Tradition. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
22. Shokhin V.K. (2011) Abhidharma Texts. In: Stepanyants M.T. Philosophy of Buddhism. Encyclopedia (pp. 69-75). Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura (in Russian).
23. Taylor A.C. (Ed.) (1894–1897) Kathāvatthu (Vols. 1–2). London: Pāli Text Society (in Pāli).
Review
For citations:
Lozhkina A.V. Kathāvatthu (“Points of Controversy”) as a Primary Source of Early Buddhist Philosophy. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2020;63(12):81-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-12-81-101