Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

Architectural Approach to Design of Emotional Intelligent Systems

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-1-102-115

Abstract

Over the past decades, due to the course towards digitalization of all areas of life, interest in modeling and creating intelligent systems has increased significantly. However, there are now a stagnation in the industry, a lack of attention to analog and bionic approaches as alternatives to digital, numerous speculations on “neuro” issues for commercial and other purposes, and an increase in social and environmental risks. The article provides an overview of the development of artificial intelligence (AI) conceptions toward increasing the human likeness of machines: from the key ideas of A. Turing and J. von Neumann, who initiated the digitalization of society, to discussions about the definition of AI and the emergence of conceptions of strong and weak AI. Special attention is paid to the approach of A. Sloman, to ideas about the architecture and design of complex artificial systems are considered, which make it possible to “emotionally” expand the idea of weak/strong AI. In the article's section on the necessity and possibility of incorporating emotions into the architecture of AI, the authors reveal the goals and methodological limitations for creating an emotional artificial agent. In addition, the article briefly presents the main principles of the authors' architectural approach to the creation of emotional intellectual systems on the example of the cognitive-affective model of architecture, which allow modeling the impact of emotions on the cognitive processes involved in decision-making processes. The described architectural approach to modeling intelligent systems can be used as a conceptual basis for discussing and formulating a strategy for the development of neurocomputing, philosophy of artificial intelligence, and experimental philosophy, for developing innovative research programs, formulating and solving theoretical and methodological problems.

About the Authors

Alexandra V. Shiller
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Alexandra V. Shiller – Ph.D. in Philosophy, Head of the grants department, Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University.

Moscow.



Oleg E. Petrunya
Moscow Aviation Institute
Russian Federation

Oleg E. Petrunya – Ph.D. in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, Moscow Aviation Institute.

Moscow.



References

1. Alekseev A.Yu. (2013) Complex Turing Test: Philosophical-Methodological and Socio-Cultural Aspects. Moscow: IInteLL (in Russian).

2. Biryukov B.V. (1978) What Can Computing Machines Do? Instead of an Afterword. In: Dreyfus H. What Computers Can't Do. Critique of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 298-332). Moscow: Progress (in Russian).

3. Broekens J., DeGroot D., & Kosters W.A. (2008) Formal Models of Appraisal: Theory, Specification, and Computational Model. Cognitive Systems Research. Vol. 9, no. 3, pp.173-197.

4. Colombetti G. (2014) Ideas for an Affective Neuro-physio-phenomenology. In: Colombetti G. The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind (pp. 135-170). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

5. Feinberg E.L. (1981) Cybernetics, Logic, Art. Moscow: Radio i svyaz' (in Russian).

6. Fellous J.M. (2004) From Human Emotions to Robot Emotions. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium: Architecture for Modeling Emotion (technical report SS-04-02). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.

7. Fontaine J.R.J., Scherer K.R., Roesch E.B., & Ellsworth P.C. (2007) The World of Emotions Is Not Two-Dimensional. Psychological Science. Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1050-1057.

8. LeDoux J., Phelps L., & Alberini C. (2016) What We Talk about When We Talk about Emotions. Cell. Vol. 167, no. 6, pp. 1443-1445.

9. Lewis M. (2008) Self-Conscious Emotions: Embarrassment, Pride, Shame, and Guilt. In: Lewis M. & Haviland-Jones J.M. (Eds.) Handbook of Emotions (3rd ed., pp.742-749). New York: Gilford Press.

10. Newell A. & Simon H.A. (1976) Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 19, no 3, pp. 113-126.

11. Niedenthal P.M., Winkielman P., Mondillon L., & Vermeulen N. (2009) Embodiment of Emotion Concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 96, no. 6, pp.1120-1136.

12. Ortony A., Clore G.L., & Collins A. (1988) The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

13. Osgood C.E., May W.H., & Miron M.S. (1975) Cross-Cultural Universals in Affective Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

14. Panksepp J. (1998) Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.

15. Petrunya O.E. (2017) The Opposition of Natural and Artificial in Neuroscience: “Who Is to Blame” and “What to Do.” Neyrokompyutery: razrabotka, primeneniye = Neurocomputers: Development, Application. No. 4, pp. 26-30 (in Russian).

16. Petrunya O.E. (2021) Anthropic Approach vs. Imitation Game: Philosophical and Methodological Problems of Science and Technology in the Digital Age. Moscow: LENAND (in Russian).

17. Poincare H. (2014) Mathematics and Logic. In: The Foundations of Science: Science and Hypothesis, The Value of Science, Science and Method (pp. 448-459). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

18. Post E.L. (1936) Finite Combinatory Processes - Formulation 1. The Journal of Symbolic Logic. Vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 103-105.

19. Searle J.R. (1980) Minds, Brains, and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Vol. 3, no 3, pp. 417-457.

20. Shiller A.V. (2019) Expression of Modeled Effects of Emotions in Artificial Agents as a Visual Language. ПРАЕНМА. Problems of Visual Semiotics. Vol. 22, no. 4., pp. 223-243 (in Russian).

21. Simon H.A. (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

22. Sloman A. (1986) Did Searle Attack Strong Strong or Weak Strong AI? In: Cohn A.G. & Thomas J.R. (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications (pp. 271-288). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

23. Sloman A. (1999) What Sort of Architecture is Required for a HumanLike Agent? In: Wooldridge M. & Rao A. (Eds.) Foundations of Rational Agency (pp. 35-52). Dordrecht: Springer.

24. Svintsitsky V.N. (1964) On the Question of the Genetic Connection of Cybernetics with Classical Automatics. In: Berg A.I., Biryukov B.B., Novik I.B., Kuznetsov I.V., & Spirkin A.G. (Eds.) Cybernetics, Thought, Life (pp. 164-172). Moscow: Mysl' (in Russian).

25. Turing A. (1937) On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. Series 2. Vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 230-265.

26. Turing A. (1950) Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind. Vol. 59. no. 236, pp. 433-460.

27. Vedyakhin A.A. et al. (2021) Strong Artificial Intelligence: Approaching the Supermind (A.S. Potapov, Ed.). Moscow: Alpina Publisher (in Russian).

28. von Neumann J. (1995) The General and Logical Theory of Automata. In: Brody F. & Vamos T. (Eds.) The Neumann Compendium (Vol. 1, pp. 526-566). Singapore: World Scientific.

29. Wright I.P., Sloman A., Beaudoin L.P. (1996) Towards a Design-Based Analysis of Emotional Episodes. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology. Vol. 3, no 2, pp.101-126.

30. Yanovskaya S.A. (1960) Preface to the Russian Translation. In: Turing A. Can Machines Think? (pp. 3-11). Moscow: Fizmatgiz (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Shiller A.V., Petrunya O.E. Architectural Approach to Design of Emotional Intelligent Systems. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2021;64(1):102-115. https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-1-102-115



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)