Neurophilosophy, Philosophy of Neuroscience, and Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence: The Problem of Distinguishing

Neurophilosophy is understood as different areas of philosophy, for example, the philosophy of neuroscience, the philosophy of artificial intelligence, or eliminative materialism. This excessive interpretation of the term is due to the fact that the understanding of the subject area of this discipline is still incomplete. For example, one of the earliest definitions of neurophilosophy given by P.S. Churchland stated reduction of psychology to neurosciences. In modern views, the idea of neurophilosophy as an attempt to justify eliminative materialism is outdated and does not correspond to reality. The article analyzes the terms “philosophy of neuroscience,” “neurophilosophy,” and “philosophy of artificial intelligence” and also offers a variant of their differentiation. The authors focus on the common and different features, using the example of G.M. Edelman's theory of consciousness and the concept of connectionism for weak artificial intelligence. It is concluded that integral use of the term “neurophilosophy” should be abandoned. As a result, the term “neurophilosophy” should be understood as a direction in philosophy of the early 21st century, applying neuroscientific concepts to solve traditional philosophical problems, while the philosophy of specific neurosciences can be considered primarily as a field in the philosophy of science that formulates and solves problems of specific neurosciences as well as of the entire neuroscientific direction. The philosophy of artificial intelligence is an area in philosophy that answers the question of what non-biological intelligence is and what makes it possible; in other words, it is a philosophical and methodological basis for the study of non-biological intelligence. In the formation of neurosciences and their scientific and philosophical basis, we are still at the first methodological stage of the analysis and differentiation of hypotheses. After some time, there will emerge a philosophy of neuroscience, as the basis of all existing neuroscientific theories, and then this term will acquire greater significance.

1. Alekseev A.Y., Kuznetsov V.G., Saveliev A.V., & Yankovskaya E.A. (2015) The Formation of the National Neurophilosophy. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. No. 11, pp. 48-66. (In Russian).

2. Bickle J., Mandik P., & Landreth A. (2019) The Philosophy of Neuroscience. In: Zalta E.N. (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/neuroscience

3. Buckner С. (2019) Connectionism. In: Zalta E.N. (Ed.) The StanfordEn-cyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/connectionism

4. Churchland P.S. (1986) Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain, (Computational Models of Cognition and Perception). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

5. Dubrovsky D.I, (2015) Neurophilosophy and the Problem of Consciousness. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. No. 11, pp. 9-22 (in Russian).

6. Edelman G.M (2001) Consciousness: The Remembered Present. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol. 929, no. 1, pp. 111-122 (Russian translation in: Kniazeva E.N. (Ed.) Evolutionary Epistemology. Anthology (pp. 419-438). Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2012).

7. Edelman G.M. (2007) Learning in and from Brain-Based Devices. Science. Vol. 318, no. 5853, pp. 1103-1105.

8. Gold I. & Roskies A.L. (2008) Philosophy of Neuroscience. In: Ruse M. (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology (pp. 349-380). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

9. Ivin A.A. (Ed.) (2004) Philosophy: Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: Gardariki. (In Russian).

10. Jungert M. (2017) Neurophilosophy or Philosophy of Neuroscience? What Neuroscience and Philosophy Can and Cannot Do for Each Other. In: Hildt E. & Leefmann J. (Eds.): The Human Sciences after the Decade of the Brain. Perspectives on the Neuro-Turn in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (pp. 3-13). London: Academic Press.

11. Revonsuo A. (2009) Consciousness: The Science of Subjectivity. Hove: Psychology Press (Russian translation: Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2013).

12. Rosenfeld A., Zemel R., & Tsotsos J. (2018) The Elephant in the Room. arXiv. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.03305

13. Seung S. (2012) Connectome: How the Brain's Wiring Makes Us Who We Are. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (Russian translation: Moscow: BINOM, 2014).