Worldview Aspect of the Evolutionary-Projective Philosophy of Russian Cosmism
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-3-7-25
Abstract
The article examines two worldview strategies of the evolutionary-projective philosophy of Russian Cosmism: the strategy associated with elimination of human corporeality, which has found adherents in current transhumanism, and the strategy proposed by humanistic worldview paradigm that directs humanity to the implementation of a deontological noospheric project of coevolution of planetary nature and society as a necessary condition for progress of our socio-natural universe. The focus is on analysis of the worldview insights of Russian Cosmists. In particular, the article addresses Vladimir Vernadsky’s worldview concepts regarding the changing role of man in nature and society. This is caused by changes in material resources, methods and degree of man’s transformation of the world as a result of the use of the microworld’s objects and processes as tools of labor (which are now called nanotechnologies). Among V.I. Vernadsky’s major insights that have been successfully verified in social practice, the article considers such worldview conceptions as orientation toward peaceful use of nuclear energy and the inevitability of replacing organic energy sources with inorganic ones; the need to maintain invariability of the biogenic constants of the planetary ecosystem (biosphere); human autotrophy – providing mankind with abiogenic food and other technogenic resources instead of substances and resources of biogenic origin; formation of a specific hu man person as a factor in the evolution of a planetary socio-natural whole. Taken together, all of these are due to the change in the place and role of modern man in nature and society, and these are also reflected in the formation of an ideological paradigm that is adequate to new trends in the practical evolution of the planetary socio-natural whole.
About the Author
Yury V. OleinikovRussian Federation
Yury V. Oleinikov – Leading Researcher, Social Philosophy Department
Moscow
References
1. Beskaravaynyy S.S. (2018) The Being of Technics and Singularity. Moscow: RIPOL classic (in Russian).
2. Dubrovky D.I. & Klimova S.M. (Eds.) (2014) Global Future 2045: Anthropological Crisis. Convertgent Technologies. Transhumanistic Projects: Materials of the Conference, Belgorod, April, 11–12, 2013. Moscow: Kanon+ (in Russian).
3. Fyodorov N.F. (1982) The Question of Brotherhood or Kinship, the Causes of Non-Fraternal, Unrelated, i.e., Non-Peaceful, State of the World and the Means to Restore Kinship. In: Fyodorov N.F. Selected Writings. Moscow: Mysl’ (in Russian).
4. Haitun S.D. (2015) The Phenomenon of Man on the Background of Universal Evolution. Moscow: Librokom (in Russian).
5. Le Roy E. (1927) Exigence idealiste et le fait d’evolution. Paris: Boivin & Cie (in French).
6. Los’ V.A. (1973) The Problem of Rationalisation of the Relationship “Man – Nature” in the Light of V.I. Vernadsky’s Ideas about the “Autotrophy of Humanity”. In: Fadeev E.T. (Ed.) Interaction of Nature and Society: Philosophical, Geographical, Ecological Aspects of the Problem (pp. 53−69). Moscow: Nauka, 1973 (in Russian).
7. Muravyov N.V. (1998) Mastering the Time. Selected Philosophical and Publicistic Writings. Moscow: ROSSPEN (in Russian).
8. Oleinikov Yu.V. (2016) Verification of the Philosophical Insights of Philosophy of Russian Cosmism. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. No. 8, pp. 138–149 (in Russian).
9. Oleinikov Yu.V. (2017) Verification of Ecological-Worldview Insights of V.I. Vernadsky. Filosofiya i kul’tura. No. 7, pp. 41−52 (in Russian).
10. Oleinikov Yu.V. & Borzova T.V. (2008) Ecological Interaction of Society and Nature (Philosophical Analysis). Moscow: Russian State Social University Press (in Russian).
11. Oleinikov Yu.V. & Onosov A.A. (1999) Noospheric Project of Socio-Natural Evolution. Moscow: RAS Institute of Philosophy (in Russian).
12. Shanahan M. (2015) The Technological Singularity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (Russian translation: Moscow: Tochka Publishing Group, Alpina Publisher, 2017).
13. Sukhovo-Kobylin A.V. (n.d.) The Will. Central State Archive of Literature and Art of St. Petersburg (fund no. 438, list 1, storage object 161, p. 54). Saint Petersburg, Russia.
14. Teilhard de Chardin P.T. (1965) Le Phénomène humaine. Moscow: Nauka (Russian translation).
15. Tsiolkovsky K.E. (1986) Dreams of Earth and Sky. Tula: Priokskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo (in Russian).
16. Turchin A.V. & Batin M.A. (2019) Futurology. 21st Century: Immortality or the Global Catastrophy? Moscow: BINOM. Laboratoriya znaniy (in Russian).
17. Vernadsky V.I. (1922) Outlines and Speeches. Part II. Petrograd: Nauchnoe khimiko-tekhnicheskoe izdatel’stvo(in Russian).
18. Vernadsky V.I. (1960) History of the Minerals of the Earth’s Сrust. Vol. 2: History of Natural Waters. In: Vernadsky V.I. Selected Writings in 5 Vols. (Vol. 4, book 2, pp. 7−494). Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
19. Vernadsky V.I. (1965) Chemical Composition of Earths’ Biosphere and Its Surrounding. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
20. Vernadsky V.I. (1980) The Problems of Biogeochemistry. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
21. Vince G. (2019) Adventures in the Anthropocene: A Journey to the Heart of the Planet We Made. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions (Russian translation: Moscow: Colibri, Azbuka-Attikus, 2019).
22. Vinge V. (2019) Singularity (The Coming Technological Singularity. What If the Singularity Does Not Happen? The Cookie Monster). Moscow: AST (Russian translation).
Review
For citations:
Oleinikov Yu.V. Worldview Aspect of the Evolutionary-Projective Philosophy of Russian Cosmism. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2021;64(3):7-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-3-7-25