Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

What Is Man? Interpreting the Philosophical-Anthropological Ideas of Karl Marx Part 2: Sociality and Historicity of Man

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-4-122-132

Abstract

This article uses the key concepts available in Karl Marx’s texts and attempts to answer the question, “What is man?” The author explores such constitutive aspects of man’s generic essence (Gattungswesen des Menschen) and of man’s worldly being as corporeality and relationship with nature; suffering as a product of desire; praxis (Praxis) as productive creative activity (produktive Tätigkeit, Selbstbetätigung) that is carried out in the dialectical processes of objectification (Vergegenständlichung, Äußerung) and de-objectification (Entgegenständlichung, Aneignung); man’s universality; objectivity (Gegenständlichkeit) of the man-made human world; intersubjectivity and sociality/sociability (Gesellschaftlichkeit); interplay of social relations (das Ensemble der gesellschaftlichen Verhältnisse); the existential and emotional relations of man (menschlichen Verhältnisse zur Welt) to the world of nature, to human activity, to the results of one’s labor, to other people, and to oneself. We demonstrate that the generic essence of man is not granted by nature but evolves in the course of historical development. Moreover, in Capital, Marx distinguishes between the invariant essence (Praxis) and historical modifications of praxis. Therefore, history is understood as “continuous change of human nature,” and man himself as a historical being. In spite of later reductionist interpretations, Marx conceptualizes man as a living, uniquely generic (socially individual), integral being, whose essential mode of existence is praxis (social conscious purposeful transforming objectal-instrumental material and spiritual activity). Man is an integral bodily-spiritual being, transforming the natural world (Welt) and creating “worlds” of his own, those of material, social, and spiritual culture (Umwelt), society and its relations (Mitwelt), which are interiorized and form an inner world (Innerlichkeit, Eigenwelt) in the process of practical activity. The article concludes that, following Marx’s philosophical anthropology, man should be considered not only as a “practical being” but also a suffering one, experiencing his worldly existence in the form of partial, existential relations to the world and to himself.

About the Author

Petr N. Kondrashov
Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

D.Sc. in Philosophy, Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Philosophy and Law

Yekaterinburg



References

1. Lukács G. (1984) Prolegomena zur Ontologie des gesellschaftlichen Seins. In: Lukács G. Werke (Vol. 13, pp. 7–324). Darmstadt: Luchterhand (in German).

2. Marx K. (1975) Theses on Feuerbach. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 5, pp. 6–8). New York: International Publishers.

3. Marx K. (1976) The Poverty of Philosophy. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 6, pp. 105–212). New York: International Publishers.

4. Marx K. (1982) Marx to Annenkov. 28 December 1846. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 38, pp. 95–106). New York: International Publishers.

5. Marx K. (1986) Economic Manuscripts of 1857–1858 (Grundrisse). In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 28). New York: International Publishers.

6. Marx K. (1987) A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 29, pp. 257–417). New York: International Publishers.

7. Marx K. (1996) Capital. Vol. 1: The Process of Capitalist Production. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 35). New York: International Publishers.

8. Marx K. (1998) Capital. Vol. 3: The Process of Capitalist Production as a Whole. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 37). New York: International Publishers.

9. Marx K. & Engels F. (1975a) The German Ideology. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 5). New York: International Publishers.

10. Marx K. & Engels F. (1975b) The Holy Family. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Collected Works (Vol. 4, pp. 5–211). New York: International Publishers.

11. Mozheeva A.K. (1978) The Problem of Human Subjectivity in the Light of Marx’s Theory of the Historical Process. In: Kuzmina T.A. (Ed.) Man and His Being as a Problem of Modern Philosophy (pp. 252–277). Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).

12. Petrović G. (1967) Marx in the Mid-Twenieth Century. New York: Anchor.

13. Tabak M. (2012) Dialectics of Human Nature in Marx’s Philosophy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.


Review

For citations:


Kondrashov P.N. What Is Man? Interpreting the Philosophical-Anthropological Ideas of Karl Marx Part 2: Sociality and Historicity of Man. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2021;64(4):122-132. https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-4-122-132



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)