Transdisciplinary Status of the Ecological Modernization Theory and Its Role in the Development of Environmental Paradigm

The article examines the specificity of transdisciplinary orientations in modern scientific knowledge and reveals the multidimensionality of transdisciplinarity as a phenomenon of post-nonclassical science. Since transdisciplinarity is largely formed as a response to the challenge of increasing complexity and uncertainty of the future transformations in the “nature – man – society” system, the most appropriate area of transdisciplinary research today is environmental knowledge. In the example of the Ecological Modernization Theory (EMT), we investigate the interdisciplinary structure and transdisciplinary status of contemporary social ecology. The aim of the article is to analyze the various modes of transdisciplinarity in the structure of the ecological modernization theory and to identify its role in the dynamics of modern environmentalism. The epistemological status of EMT is explicated through philosophical and methodological reflection on the alternative discourses of sustainability as well as by using the principles of a systematic approach, methods of comparative analysis and semantic interpretation. The idea of sustainable development and the values of environmentalism are considered important factors in the formation of concepts and categories of this theory, its initial postulates and principles. The article substantiates the synthetic character of this theory, which meets the requirements of the post-non-classical type of scientific rationality. A conclusion is substantiated that EMT can be classified as a post-normal science. As a result of the analysis, it is argued that environmental philosophy has a special understanding of the goals of social development, principles of justice, social harmony, and human well-being. The reinterpretation of these concepts is a basis for adoption of novel theoretical schemes and methodological orientations in the system of modern socio-environmental studies.

1. Beck U. (2000) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya (Russian translation).

2. Buttel F.H. (2000a) Ecological Modernization as Social Theory. Geoforum. Vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 57–65.

3. Buttel F.H. (2000b) Classical Theory and Contemporary Environmental Sociology: Some Reflections on the Antecedents and Prospects for Reflexive Modernisation Theories in the Study of Environment and Society. In: Spaargaren G., Mol A.P.J., & Buttel F.H. (Eds.). Environment and Global Modernity (pp. 17–39). London: Sage.

4. Cohen M.J. (1997) Risk Society and Ecological Modernisation Alternative Visions for Post-Industrial Nations. Futures. Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 105– 119.

5. Efremenko D.V., Yanitsky O.N., & Ermolaeva P.O. (2019) On Sociobiotechnical Systems. Voprosy Filosophii. No. 5, pp. 138–147 (in Russian).

6. Funowicz S. & Ravetz J. (1993) Science for the Post Normal Age. Futures. Vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 735–755.

7. Funowicz S., Ravetz J., & O’Conner M. (1998) Challenges in the Use of Science for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Sustainable Development. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 99–107.

8. Giddens A. (2011) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge, UK Polity Press (Russian translation: Moscow: Praxis, 2011).

9. Irwin A. (1995) Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise, and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.

10. Irwin A. (2001) Sociology and the Environment: A Critical Introduction to Society, Nature and Knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

11. Kulyasov I.P. (2005) Ecological Modernization: theoretical aspects. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii. Vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 100–113 (in Russian).

12. Mol A.P.J. & Sonnenfeld D.A. (2000) Ecological Modernisation Around the World: An Introduction. Environmental Politics. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3–14.

13. Pellizoni L. (1999) Reflexive Modernisation and Beyond: Knowledge and Value in the Politics of Environment and Technology. Theory, Culture and Society. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 99–125.

14. Yanitsky O.N. (2008, 23 May) On Modernization in Three Spaces. The Plenum of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation. Retrieved from http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=752 (in Russian).

15. Yanitsky O.N. (2016) Socio-biotechnical systems: a new look at the interaction of man and nature. Sotsilogicheskaya nauka i sotsiologicheskaya praktika. Vol. 4, no 3, pp. 5–22 (in Russian).

16. Yanitsky O.N. (2019a) Biosphere and the Sociosphere: How to Combine Their Research? Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost. No. 1, pp. 178–189 (in Russian).

17. Yanitsky O.N. (2019b) Is Possible Today the Social Forecasting of the Mobile World Dynamics? Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology = Vestnik Instituta sotziologii. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 12–27 (in Russian).

18. Yanitsky O.N. (2019c) Challenges and Risks of Globalization. Seven Theses. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. No. 1, pp. 29–39 (in Russian).