Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

Artificial Intelligence: The Opacity of Concepts in the Uncertainty of Realities

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-65-1-27-43

Abstract

The development of the systems of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital transformation in general lead to the formation of multitude of autonomous agents of artificial and mixed genealogy, as well as to complex structures in the information and regulatory environment with many opportunities and pathologies and a growing level of uncertainty in making managerial decisions. The situation is complicated by the continuing plurality of understanding of the essence of AI systems. The modern expanded understanding of AI goes back to ideas formulated more than 100 years ago. In official national policy documents on the development of AI, working definitions of AI are preferred. The current stage of AI systems life cycle can be assessed as the completion of the initial period in the development of systems associated with weak AI. The ability of artificial systems to realize themselves as a separate person becomes one of the serious scientific and practical challenges. Attention to the issues of the ethics of AIS indicates the expansion of the diversity of its forms and the beginning of the work in the field of goal-setting. New moral and ethical problems also arise in connection with the possibility of the creation of genuine conscious subjects in the foreseeable future. There is an increasing phenomenon of degradation of natural intelligence. It is required to take into account the issue of the heterogeneity of data generated by humans, electronic sensors and network devices in the dynamic complex environments of the digital economy, the issue of the complexity of the process of co-evolution of AI systems, collective and individual natural consciousness. A special area of opportunities and risks is the development of neurotechnologies. The object of control is digital twins, through which there can be manipulation of real attitudes, preferences, and behavior of individuals. As a result, there are the development of technological capabilities that provoke destructive phenomena as well as the formation of a new class of mass addictions.

About the Author

Alexander I. Ageev
Institute for Economic Strategies, Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation

Alexander I. Ageev – D.Sc. in Economics, Professor, Director of the Institute for Economic Strategies, Russian Academy of Science.

Moscow



References

1. Ageev A.I. (Ed.) (2018) Ready for the Digital? Assessment of the Adaptability of the High-Tech Complex of Russia to the Realities of the Digital Economy. Moscow: INES (in Russian).

2. Ageev A.I. (Ed.) (2020) Socio-Economic Aspects of the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence. Moscow: Aiti Servis (in Russian).

3. Ageev A.I. & Loginov E.L. (2017) Battle for the Future: Who Will Be the First in the World to Master the Noomonitoring and Cognitive Programming of Subjective Reality? Ekonomicheskie strategii. Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 124–139 (in Russian).

4. Ageev A.I. & Loginov E.L. (2022) Neuromanagement of Personality. Moscow: INES (in Russian).

5. Ageev A.I., Loginov E.L., Shkuta A.A., & Derkach A.K. (2019) Network neurocognitive management of complex organizations with a political component in fuzzy information environments. Mikroekonomika. Vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 5–13 (in Russian).

6. Arseniev K.K. & Petrushevsky F.F. (Eds.) (1902) Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary (Vol. XXXIV-A). Saint Petersburg: F.A. Brochkaus, I.A. Efron (in Russian).

7. Dyakov S.I. (2015) Psychosemantic Model and Technique of Analysis and Evaluation of the Subjectivity of the Personality. In: “Lomonosov Readings – 2015” Scientific Conference (pp. 121–122). Moscow: MAKS Press (in Russian).

8. Gardner H. (1983) Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books (Russian translation: Moscow: Vil’yams, 2007).

9. Kalyaev I.A. (2019) Artificial Intelligence: Whither Goest Thou? Ekonomicheskie strategii. Vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 6–15 (in Russian).

10. Kholodov Yu.A. (1982) The Brain in Electromagnetic Fields. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).

11. Kukshev V.I. (2020) Classification of Artificial Intelligence Systems. Ekonomicheskie strategii. Vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 58–67 (in Russian).

12. Lefebvre V.A. (2003) Reflection. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr (in Russian).

13. Lyakhov A.F. & Trishin I.M. (2013) Computer Simulation of Player Behavior in an Intellectual Card Game Using a Neural Network. Komp’yuternye instrumenty v obrazovanii. No. 5, pp. 54–64 (in Russian).

14. McCarthy J. (2007) What Is Artificial Intelligence? Retrieved from http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/whatisai/whatisai.pdf

15. Osipov Y.S. (Ed.) (2008) Great Russian Encyclopedia (Vol. 11). Moscow: Bol’shaya Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya (in Russian).

16. Osochenko E.A. & Makushkin A.G. (2019) Atlas of End-to-End Technologies of the Digital Economy of Russia. Moscow: Grinatom (in Russian).

17. Ponomareva O.S. & Ustyuzhanin V.N. (2016) On the State and Prospects for the Use of Psychosemantic Methods of Cognition of the Personality of a Suspect in the Activities of an Investigative Officer. The Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. No. 2, pp. 190–194 (in Russian).

18. Raikov A.N. (2015) Modeling the Collective Unconsciousness in Decision Making. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference CPT-2014 of the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University), Institute of Physical and Technical Informatics (pp. 146–156). Protvino: Institute of Physical and Technical Informatics. (in Russian).

19. Raikov A.N. (2021a) Hybrid Strong Artificial Intelligence. Ekonomicheskie strategii. Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 62–63 (in Russian).

20. Raikov A. (2021b) Cognitive Semantics of Artificial Intelligence: A New Perspective. Singapore: Springer.

21. Samartsev O.R. & Latenkova V.M. (2016) Psychosemantic Aspects of the Perception of Interactive Discourse in the Internet Media. Cherepovets State University Bulletin. No. 2, pp. 87–91 (in Russian).

22. Sevostyanov Yu.O. (2014) Change of Psychosemantic Structure of Willingness to Work in a Team of Students. Scientific Bulletin of the Southern Institute of Management. No. 2, pp. 94–97 (in Russian).

23. Smirnov I., Beznosyuk E., & Zhuravlev A. (1995) Psychotechnologies: Computer Psychosemantic Analysis and Psychocorrection at the Unconscious Level. Moscow: Progress – Kul’tura (in Russian).

24. Turing A.M. (1950) Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind. Vol. 59, no. 236, pp. 433–460.

25. Volynsky-Basmanov Yu.M. (2010) Application of Neuro-Linguistic Programming Methods to Identify Potentially Dangerous Persons. Problemy bezopasnosti i chrezvchaynykh situatsiy. No. 5, pp. 124–128 (in Russian).

26. Yasnitsky L.N. & Sichinava Z.I. (2011) Neural Network Algorithms for Analyzing the Behavior of Respondents. Neirokomp’yutery: razrabotka, primenenie. No. 10, pp. 59–64 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Ageev A.I. Artificial Intelligence: The Opacity of Concepts in the Uncertainty of Realities. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2022;65(1):27-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-65-1-27-43



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)