The Problem of Autopoiesis of Technogenic Civilization and the Formation of Value Base for the Use of Digital Technology

The paper discusses the self-reproduction ability of the existing technogenic civilization and the issues of the influence of self-reproduction mechanisms on the formation of axiological grounds for the use of digital technologies generated by this civilization. The self-reproduction of civilizational structures is considered through their constant repetition in the process of communication. In existing philosophical and sociological studies based on systems approach, the term autopoiesis, introduced for these purposes in the works of N. Luhmann, has already been used to describe such processes. Considering the autopoiesis of the technogenic civilization, the articles relies on the works of V.S. Stepin to determine the main features of that civilization. As a result of the conducted research, it was revealed that the existing internal contradictions of the technogenic civilization that can lead and are already leading to its crisis, including the value one, are caused by simultaneous presence of mutually non-complementary autopoietic structures: (1) the ones related to the industrial and post-industrial era and to the scientific worldview; (2) and structures that have passed into modernity from the pre-industrial era, and yet still are have value and cultural significance in modern society. The author concludes that, forming the value foundations of the use of modern digital technologies, the technogenic civilization is forced to overcome the abovementioned gaps in its own autopoietic structures and create value systems free from these contradictions.

1. Chettiparamb A. (2020) Autopoietic Interaction Systems: Microdynamics of Participation and Its Limits. International Planning Studies. Vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 427–440.

2. Clarke B. (2019) Finding Cybernetics. World Futures. Vol. 75, no. 1–2, pp. 17–28.

3. Knyazeva E.N. (2005) The Creative Path of Francisco Varela: From the Theory of Autopoiesis to a New Concept in Cognitive Science. Voprosy filosofii. No. 8, pp. 91–104 (in Russian).

4. Kagan M.S. (1997) Philosophical Theory of Values. Saint Petersburg: Petropolis (in Russian).

5. Lepskiy V.E. (2016) Analytics of the Assembly of Development Subjects. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr (in Russian).

6. Luhmann N. (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp (Russian translation: Moscow: Logos, 2011).

7. Maturana H. & Varela F. (1980) Autopoiesis: The Organization of the Living. In: Maturana H. & Varela F. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (pp. 63–134). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

8. Shokhin V.K. (2006) Philosophy of Values and Early Axiological Thought. Moscow: RUDN Publishing House (in Russian).

9. Stepin V.S. (1989) Scientific Knowledge and Values of Technogenic Civilization. Voprosy filosofii. No. 10, pp. 3–18 (in Russian).

10. Stepin V.S. (2011) Civilization and Culture. Saint Petersburg: SPbGUP (in Russian).

11. Stepin V.S., Gorokhov V.G., & Rozov M.A. (1995) Philosophy of Science and Technology. Moscow: Kontakt-Alpha (in Russian).

12. Šubrt J. (2019) Niklas Luhmann’s System Theory: A Critical Analysis. RUDN Journal of Sociology. Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 607–616.