On Rules in Contemporary Praxis

The article exposes the analysis of different socio-philosophical approaches to the fixation of a rule in contemporary praxis. It clarifies the status and role of the rule as a notion in practical philosophy. The author compares the advantages of neo-Aristotelian, neo-Kantian and socio-critical approaches to the revelation of valid forms of praxis rules. In the framework of social philosophy, the article demonstrates the interdependency and succession of these approaches to the interpretation of the essence of the practical rule. The renaissance of the Aristotelean definition of praxis is considered in the works by E. Stein and A. MacIntyre. The relevance of the neo-Kantian approach to the revelation of the nature of practical rule in contemporary social theory is justified on the basis of works by R. Jaeggi, E. von Redecker and J. Butler. The author traces the productive interaction between the neo-Aristotelean and the neo-Kantian approaches to defining praxis rules. Special attention is paid to the philosophy of H. Lotze and E. Lask, where is accomplished the practical turn from the Aristotelean accomplished deed itself to the Kantian judgement about a value of this or that form fulfillment. The dominance of the axiological approach to praxis in contemporary social theory is problematised by means of the neo-Aristotelean interpretation, which prevents its alienation from the essence of the virtue action. The late modern characteristic forms of the practical rule fulfillment in creative activity are considered. There is justified the necessity of turning the theory of practices to the neo-Kantian and the neo-Aristotelean traditions in order to reveal valid forms of expressing and preserving the value-normative nature of rules in contemporary society. That can partially overcome the pragmatic relativism of the theory of practices, which neglects the traditional sense of the praxis rule in its situational intersubjective interpretation. Taking into account complexity and non-linear development of social reality, as well as of the variety of approaches to its reflection, there is explicated the relevance of the determination of contextually possible and universally necessary forms of praxis rules, which are justifiable as value meaningful.

1. Agamben G. (2020) The Highest Poverty: Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press; Saint Petersburg: Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Saint Petersburg State University (Russian translation).

2. Aristotle. (2012) Politics (Zhebelev S.A. & Gasparov M.L., Trs.). Moscow: AST (Russian translation).

3. Aristotle. (2020) Ethics (Radlova E. & Miller T., Trs.). Moscow: AST (Russian translation).

4. Butler J. (2018) Notes toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press (Russian translation).

5. Descartes R. (1950a) Rules for the Direction of the Mind. In: Descartes R. Selected Works (pp. 77–170). Moscow: Politizdat (Russian translation).

6. Descartes R. (1950b) The Passions of the Soul. In: Descartes R. Selected Works (pp. 593–710). Moscow: Politizdat (Russian translation).

7. Elias N. (2017) Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation: Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (in German).

8. Evagrius Ponticus (1987). Praktikos and On Prayer (S. Tugwell, Tr.). Oxford: Faculty of Theology.

9. Hunt L. (2018) The French revolution and private life. In: A History of Private Life (Vol. 3, pp. 19 –51). M.: Novoye literaturnoe obozrenie. (Russian translation).

10. Jaeggi R. (2018) Critique of Forms of Life (C. Cronin, Tr.). Cambridge, MA, London : The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

11. Kant I. (2003) Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner (in German).

12. Lask E. (1907) Rechtsphilosophie. In: Die Philosophie im Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts (pp. 269–320). Heidelberg: C. Winter, 1907 (in German).

13. Lotze H. (1884) Grundzüge der praktischen Philosophie. Leipzig: Verlag von C. Birzel (in German).

14. MacIntyre A.C. (2000) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt; Ekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga (Russian translation).

15. MacIntyre A.C. (2007) Edith Stein: A Philosophical Prologue, 1913–1922. – Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007.

16. Matsevich-Dukhan I.Ja. (2020) The problem of Gemeinschaft in social theory. Filosofskie issledovaniya. No. 7, pp. 126–136 (in Russian).

17. Matsevich-Dukhan I.J. (2021) Praxis and Practice: Ways of Distinguishing. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 50–79 (in Russian).

18. Sombart W. (2008) Luxury and Capitalism. In: Sombart W. Collected works in 3 Vols. (Vol. 3, 7–238). Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ (Russian translation).

19. Stein E. (2010) Beiträge zur philosophischen Begründung der Psychologie und der Geisteswissenschaften. Freiburg: Herder (in German).

20. von Redecker E. (2018) Praxis und Revolution. Frankfurt: Campus (in German).