Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

Conceptualization and Specification of the Concept of Episteme in Religious Discourse: A Theoretical and Methodological Analysis

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-65-3-138-152

Abstract

The theoretical explication and conceptualization of the concept of episteme in religious philosophy (Anselm of Canterbury) is carried out; epistemological configurations and specifications of philosophical and theological discourse are revealed (Dietrich Bonhoeffer). Anselm of Canterbury’s epistemological discourse is based on his postulated ontology: the ontological configurability of his ideas ranges from the a priori ability to think of God to reflection on his predicates. The consequence of Anselm of Canterbury’s ideas is the idea that in the act of religious faith, God becomes an ontological reality. Within the framework of the article, it is noted that the ideas of D. Bonhoeffer, like many areas of modern religious philosophy, constitute the context of the study and substantiation of the religious episteme. The simultaneity and discreteness of the act of life correlates in this concept with eternal nature of God. The concept of “irreligious Christianity” by the German theologian is a part of the processes of reforming Christian theology that took place in the 20th century. The article contains a conceptual analysis of theoretical approaches to the study of religion and religious consciousness. The role of religious knowledge in the formation of new approaches to personality and religious life is considered. The concept of religious episteme as an object of philosophical and religious analysis is explicated. The interpretive perspective of the concept of religious episteme is presented, the field of variable possibilities in the study of this phenomenon is revealed, its theoretical configurations and key, dominant features are shown. The work includes the analysis of the concept of religious episteme from the scientific and philosophical points of view, from the point of view of theoretical reflection. The problems of religious epistemology are considered on the base of historical and cultural material of approaches and concepts of both medieval and modern religious philosophy. It is concluded that religious epistemology is also a philosophical and methodological reflection on the possibility of comprehending the ultimate foundations of religious being.

About the Author

Nataly A. Nikonovich
Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus

Nataly A. Nikonovich – Ph.D. in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Senior Research Fellow of the Department of Philosophy of Culture, Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus.

Minsk



References

1. Aguirre Sala J.F. (2011) Dar razón de la fe: ejemplos de la vía anselmiana y ockhamista. Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía. Vol. 38, pp 5–21 (in Spanish).

2. Anselm of Canterbury (1995) Proslogion. In: Anselm of Canterbury. Works (pp. 93−165). Moscow: Kanon (in Russian).

3. Bonhoeffer D. (1994) Resistance and Submission. Moscow: Progress (Russian translation).

4. Chanyshev A.N. (1991) Course of Lectures on Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola (in Russian).

5. Greggs T. (2008) Religionless Christianity in a Complexly Religious and Secular World: Thinking through and beyond Bonhoeffer. In: S. Plant & R. Wustenberg (Eds.). Religion, Religionless and Contemporary Western Culture: Explorations in Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Theology (pp. 111–125). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

6. Kim N. (2014) Anselm of Canterbury and His “Ontological Proof” of the Being of God. Archpriest Nikoai Kim. Retrieved from http://onkim.orthodoxia.org/stati/anselm-kenterberijskij-i-ego-ontologicheskoe-dokazatelstvo-bytiya-bozhiya/ (in Russian).

7. Mitrokhin L.N. (Ed.) (1990) Protestantism: Atheist’s Dictionary. Moscow: Politizdat (in Russian).

8. Neretina S.S. (2008) An argument that needs only itself to justify itself. Vox. No 4. Retrieved from https://vox-journal.org/content/vox4-2neretina.pdf (in Russian).

9. Polyakov G. (2009) The Relation of Faith and Reason in the Works of Anselm of Canterbury. Khristianskoy chtenie. No. 9–10, pp. 178−193 (in Russian).

10. Reeves R. (2016) Costly Grace and a Concentration Camp. The Gospel Coalition. Retrieved July 10, 2021 from https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/great-books-friday-bonhoeffer-cost-of-discipleship/ (Russian translation: Ieshua.org. 2017. Retrieved from http://ieshua.org/ditrih-bonhyoffer-dragotsennaya-blagodat-i-kontsentratsionnyj-lager.htm)

11. Urbaniak J. (2014) From Religionless Christianity to Immanent Grace: Bonhoeffer’s Legacy in Badiou. The Journal of Religion. Vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 457−484.


Review

For citations:


Nikonovich N.A. Conceptualization and Specification of the Concept of Episteme in Religious Discourse: A Theoretical and Methodological Analysis. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2022;65(3):138-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-65-3-138-152



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)