Philosophy at Leisure: How Is Festivity Possible?

The article explores the conditions enabling the celebration within the context of philosophical, enlightening, and educational activities. The authors contemplate the role of leisure in human life, referencing Plato’s view of leisure as a prerequisite for philosophical discussion, Aristotle’s concept of intellectual leisure for the free citizen, Josef Pieper’s understanding of leisure as a means for personal and spiritual development, and Sebastian de Grazia’s perspective on the interconnection between leisure and creativity, culture, individual freedom, and society. It is argued that leisure as an intellectual activity has not become customary in society since Aristotle’s time and, in the modern world, the definition of this concept is confined merely to the realm of entertainment. This limitation necessitates the search for new forms of intellectual leisure that are relevant in the context of contemporary mass culture. The authors analyze the philosophical ball as a form of intellectual leisure, particularly focusing on the years of experience in organizing annual festive events by the family philosophical club “School of Socrates” at the Central House of Artists in Moscow. The external, attributive form of the philosophical ball is linked with Mikhail Bakhtin’s concept of the carnivalization of culture: its spectacles, theatricality, the presence of masks and costumes, and the involvement of all participants in a unified action. The internal content of the philosophical ball is determined by philosophical concepts, historical figures, or artistic images relevant to the specific era and culture, facilitating the perception and discussion of the proposed philosophical ideas. The narrative is further enriched by a case study detailing the methodological orchestration of a philosophical ball themed around Russian Symbolism. The authors conclude that the philosophical ball, as a form of intellectual leisure, addresses epistemological tasks and serves enlightening and educational functions: it engenders an authentic milieu of philosophical festivity, nurturing the creative impetus of its participants and facilitating a profound and universally accessible experiential odyssey into the realms of worldview and cognition.

1. Alves de Sousa A.A. (2015) Σχολή en Platón. In: de la Villa Polo J., Cañizares Ferriz P., Falque Rey E., González Castro J.F., & Siles Ruiz J. (Eds.) Ianua Classicorum. Temas y formas del Mundo Clásico (Vol. 2, pp. 59–66). Madrid: Sociedad Española de Estudios Clásicos (in Spanish).

2. Anastasiadis V.I. (2004) Idealized σχoλή and Disdain for Work: Aspects of Philosophy and Politics in Ancient Democracy. The Classical Quarterly. Vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 58–79.

3. Aristotle (1983a) Nicomachean Ethics (N.V. Braginskaya, Trans.). In: Aristotle. Works in 4 volumes (Vol. 4, pp. 53–293). Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).

4. Aristotle (1983b) Politics (S.A. Zhebelev, Trans.). In: Aristotle. Works in 4 volumes (Vol. 4, pp. 376–644). Moscow: Mysl’ (Russian translation).

5. Bakhtin M.M. (1990) The Work of François Rabelais and the Folk Culture of the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura (in Russian).

6. Bouwer J. & van Leeuwen M. (2017) Philosophy of Leisure: Foundations of the Good Life. London: Routledge.

7. de Grazia S. (1962) Of Time, Work, and Leisure. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.

8. Fain G.S. (Ed.) (1991) Leisure and Ethics: Reflections on the Philosophy of Leisure. Reston, VA: American Association for Leisure and Recreation.

9. Hall E. (2019) Aristotle’s Way: How Ancient Wisdom Can Change Your Life (N. Kolpakova, Trans.). Moscow: Alpina Non-Fiction (Russian translation).

10. Ilyenkov E.V. (1977) Learn to Think from an Early Age. Moscow: Znaniye (in Russian).

11. Ilyenkov E.V. (2009) The School Must Teach to Think. Moscow: MPSI; Voronezh: MODEK (in Russian).

12. Lipman M. (1996) Education for the Purpose of Reducing Violence and Promoting Peacefulness. In: Yulina N.S. (Ed.) Philosophy for Children (pp. 181–199). Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Russian translation).

13. Mounier E. (1992) Personalism (I.S. Vdovina). Moscow: Iskusstvo (Russian translation).

14. Pieper J. (1999) Muße und Kult. In: Pieper J. Werke in acht Bänden (Vol. 6, pp. 1–44). Hamburg: Meiner (in German).

15. Ramsay H. (2005) Reclaiming Leisure: Art, Sport, and Philosophy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

16. Retyunskikh L.T. (2003) “The School of Socrates”: Philosophical Games Ten Years Later. Moscow: Moscow Psychological-Social Institute; Voronezh: MODEK (in Russian).

17. Retyunskikh L.T. (2023) Education as Thinking, or The Role of Philosophy in the Educational System. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. Vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 24–50 (in Russian).

18. Snyder J.T. (2018) Leisure in Aristotle’s Political Thought. Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought. Vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 356–373.

19. Solmsen F. (1964) Leisure and Play in Aristotle’s Ideal State. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie. Vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 193–220.

20. Spracklen K. (2011) Constructing Leisure: Historical and Philosophical Debates. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

21. Stocks J.L. (1936) Σχολή. The Classical Quarterly. Vol. 30, no. 3/4, pp. 177–187.

22. Telo H. (2017) The Freedom of θεωρία and σχολή in Plato. In: Jürgasch T. & Keiling T. (Eds.) Anthropologie der Theorie (pp. 11–28). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck (in German).

23. Winnifrith T. & Barrett C. (Eds.) (1989) The Philosophy of Leisure. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.