Preview

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences

Advanced search

The Problem of Universal Judgments in Aristotle’s Ethics

https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2018-10-81-96

Abstract

The author sets a goal to show the specificity of the formulation of universal prescriptive judgments about a virtuous act (moral norms) in the framework of Aristotelian ethical doctrine. To achieve this goal, Aristotle’s philosophy concept of practical wisdom (phronesis) is analyzed. It shows a necessity to distinguish the use of practical wisdom in a personal experience of the act and for forming the inter-subjective practical knowledge (episteme) about making of a virtuous act. The specificity of ethics as practical knowledge and its difference from individual moral experience are defined by means of the distinction of the use of practical wisdom. It also shows the limitations of practical syllogism as the main rational mechanism for the formation of inter-subjective practical knowledge. Additionally, the universal prescriptive judgments are divided into informative and functional: the former reveals the content of the action, the latter – its structure, that is, the former defines what a person must do, the latter defines what an action should be to comply with the right purpose, consequently, the right content. At the same time, the right content is recognized only in individual experience and can not be expressed universally, without losing its practical value. The author concludes that the formulation of informative universal prescriptive judgments is impossible within the framework of Aristotelian ethical doctrine. It is impeded by the unsolvable problem of the correlation between the general and the particular, the transition from descriptive judgments to prescriptive judgments. However, it is possible to formulate functional universal prescriptive judgments. They also constitute the methodological basis for criticism of the accepted in society moral norms, which are based on the past positive experience of actions. 

About the Author

R. S. Platonov
Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation
Roman Platonov – Junior Research Fellow at the Department of Ethics


References

1. Anscombe G.E.M. (2000) Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

2. Apressyan R.G. (2009) The Golden Rule in Aristotle’s Ethics. In: Philosophy and ethics. A Festschrift for the 70th Birthday of Abdusalam Guseynov (pp. 157–170). Moscow: Alpha-М.

3. Apressyan R.G. (1995) The Idea of Morality and Basic Normative-Ethical Programs. Moscow: IPhRAS Pub.

4. Apressyan R.G. (2014) The Meaningofmorality. In: Morality: Diversity of Concepts and Meanings. A Festschrift for the 75th Birthday of Abdusalam Guseynov (pp. 35–63). Moscow: Alpha-М (in Russian).

5. Barnes J. (2004) Introduction. In: Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics (рр. 9–41). New York: Penguin.

6. DaVia C. (2016) Universality in Aristotle’s Ethics. In: Journal of the History of Philosophy. Vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 181–201.

7. Foot P. (2002) Virtues and vices and other essays in moral philosophy (рр. 1–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

8. Gottlieb P. (2006) The Practical Syllogism. In: The Blackwell guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics (pp. 218–233). Oxford: Blackwell Pub.

9. Guseynov A.A. (2003) Ancient ethics. Moscow: Gardariki (in Russian).

10. Guseynov А.А. (2004) Morality and Politics: Lessons from Aristotle. Vedomosti. 2004. No. 24, рр. 97–131 (in Russian).

11. Hughes G.J. (2013) The Routledge Guidebook to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. London: Routledge.

12. MacIntyre A. (2007) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

13. Nussbaum M. (1985) Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

14. Nussbaum M. (2001) The Fragility of Goodness. Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

15. Orlov E.V. (2011) Aristotle’s Philosophical Language. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of the Russian Academy of Science (in Russian).

16. Orlov E.V. (2012) Aristotle on the Universal, Ordinary and Active Knowledge in “Prior Analytics” II 21. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2012. No. 2 (18), pp. 154–165 (in Russian).

17. Patterson R. (2011) Aristotle. In: The Routledge Companion to Epistemology (pp. 666–677). London: Routledge.

18. Reeve C.D.C. (2012) Action, Contemplation, and Happiness: An Essay on Aristotle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

19. Wolf M.N. (2012) Philosophical Search: Heraclitus and Parmenides. Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Platonov R.S. The Problem of Universal Judgments in Aristotle’s Ethics. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2018;(10):81-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2018-10-81-96



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0235-1188 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8961 (Online)