Once More about the Concept of Civil Society: A Philosophical Approach

There is a huge number of publications devoted to civil society. Nevertheless this theme is inexhaustible, because the very subject of it is multidimensional and changing along with the evolution of society. Alongside this, one of the key problems of the civil society theory is a problem of its perception in our mind. Answering these questions, the author, at first, stresses the necessity to differ three historical types of civil society: ancient classical polis, civil communities of the Modern History and contemporary civil society. They all are substantially different inter se from the axiological point of view. That is a reason not to use the ideological and methodological curves developed for historically previous types of civil society for the analysis of contemporary one. Secondly, the author focuses attention upon epistemological aspect of the civil society theory, in particular he proposes to rethink the concept of “totality” not in a formal logic way but in the “logic” of living systems in order to be able by means of this concept to express the unity of the diversity of social system. Thirdly, the author treats the concept of “citizen” in informal sense, stresses its existential, personal content and contemplates it through the dialectical relation of “totality-peculiarity-individuality.” Fourthly, the author researches the phenomenon of contemporary civil society as a counterpart of a state in the complex society the main features of which are the diversity and individuality. He comes to the conclusion that the civil society is not a society in common sense, but rather is some kind of “soil structure,” so called “social mycelium” that fertilizes social system with new opportunities. In the final part of the article author gives the example of one of the approaches to estimate the degree of maturation of civil society, proposed by the world-wide international organization “Civicus.” He stresses that the logic of power distribution in contemporary society presupposes cooperation of different actors, and one of the most influential of them is the civil society.

1. Civicus (2018). State of Civil Society Report. Available at: https://www. civicus.org/index.php/state-of-civil-society-report-2018(accessed 10.07.2018).

2. Durkheim E. (1991) The Division of Labour in Society. The Method of Sociology. Moscow: Nauka (Russian translation).

3. Engels F. (1961) Karl Marx’s Funeral. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Works (2nd ed., vol. 19). Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoj literatury.

4. Gellner E. (1994) Conditions of Liberty. Civil Society and Its Rivals. New York: Penguin Press (Russian translation: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskih issledovanij, 1995).

5. Hegel G.W.F. (1990) Philosophy of Law. Moscow: M.: Mysl.

6. Kant I. (1966) Works in 6 vols. Vol. 6. Moscow: Mysl (Russian translation).

7. Kant I. (2000) Lectures on Ethics. Moscow: Respublika (Russian translation).

8. Kapustin B. (2011) Citizenship and Civil Society. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola ehkonomiki (in Russian).

9. Marx K. & Engels F. (1955) German Ideology. In: Marx K. & Engels F. Works (2nd ed., vol. 3). Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoj literatury.

10. Rosanvallon P. (2014) The Society of Equals. Moscow: Moskovskaya shkola grazhdanskogo prosveshcheniya (Russian translation).

11. Rosanvallon P. (2015) Democratic Legitimacy. Moscow: Moskovskaya shkola grazhdanskogo prosveshcheniya (Russian translation).

12. Solov’ev V.S. (1990) The Beauty in the Nature. In: Solov’ev V.S. Works in 2 vols (Vol. 2). Moscow: Mysl.

13. Tönnies F. (2002) Community and Society. Moscow: Vladimir Dal (Russian translation).

14. Zolo D (1992). Democracy and Complexity: A Realistic Approach. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press (Russian translation: Moscow: Vysshaya shkola ehkonomiki, 2010).