On the Return to Metaphysics in Analytical Philosophy of Mind

The article examines the change of theoretical framework in analytic philosophy of mind. It is well known fact that nowadays philosophical problems of mind are frequently seen as incredibly difficult. It is noteworthy that the first programs of analytical philosophy of mind (that is, logical positivism and philosophy of ordinary language) were skeptical about difficulty of that realm of problems. One of the most notable features of both those programs was the strong antimetaphysical stance, those programs considered philosophy of mind unproblematic in its nature. However, the consequent evolution of philosophy of mind shows evaporating of that stance and gradual recovery of the more sympathetic view toward the mind problematic. Thus, there were two main frameworks in analytical philosophy of mind: 1) the framework of logical positivism and ordinary language philosophy dominated in the 1930s and the 1940s; 2) the framework that dominated since the 1950s and was featured by the critique of the first framework. Thus, the history of analytical philosophy of mind moves between two highly opposite understandings of the mind problematic. The article aims to found the causes of that move in the ideas of C. Hempel and G. Ryle, who were the most notable philosophers of mind in the 1930s and the 1940s.

1. Armstrong D.A. (1968) Materialist Theory of Mind. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

2. Carnap R (2013) Psychology in the Language of Physics. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. 2013. No. 1, pp. 126–146 (Russian translation).

3. Chalmers D. (1995) Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 200–219.

4. Chomsky N. (1965) The Logical Foundations of Linguistic Theory. In: The New in Linguistics. Issue 4 (pp. 465–575). Moscow (Russian translation).

5. Churchland P.S. (1987) Epistemology in the Age of Neuroscience. The Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 84, no. 10. 1987, pp. 544–553.

6. Dennett D.С. (1986) Content and Consciousness. London.

7. Feigl H. (1967) The ‘Mental’ and the ‘Physical’: The Essay and a Postscript. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

8. Fodor J.A. (1983) Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

9. Hempel C. (1950) Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning. Revue internationale de philosophie. Vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 41–63.

10. Hempel C. (1980) The Logical Analysis of Psychology. In: Block N. (Ed.) Readings in Philosophy of Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 14–23). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

11. Ivanov D.V. (2013) The Nature of Phenomenal Consciousness. Moscow (in Russian).

12. Lewis D. (1966) An Argument for the Identity Theory. Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 17–25.

13. Makeeva L.B. (2011) Language, Ontology and Realism. Moscow (in Russian).

14. Place U.T. (1956) Is Consciousness a Brain Process? British Journal of Psychology. Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 44–50.

15. Putnam H. (1999) Philosophy of Mind. Moscow (Russian translation). Searle J.R. (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

16. Searle J.R. (1983) Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

17. Smart J.J.C. (1959) Sensations and Brain Processes. Philosophical Review. 1959. Vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 141–156.

18. Ryle G. (1971) Autobiographical. In: Wood O.P. & Pitcher G. (Eds.) Ryle, A Collection of Critical Essays (pp. 1–17). London: Macmillan.

19. Ryle G. (1999) The Concept of Mind. Moscow (Russian translation).

20. Vasilyev V.V. (2009) The Hard Problem of Consciousness. Moscow (in Russian).

21. Weitz M. (1951) Professor Ryle’s “Logical Behaviorism.” The Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 297–301.

22. Yulina N.S. (2004a) The Mystery of Consciousness: Alternative Strategies of Research. Voprosy filosofii. 2004. No. 10, pp. 125–135 (in Russian).

23. Yulina N.S. (2004b) The Mystery of Consciousness: Alternative Strategies of Research. Voprosy filosofii. 2004. No. 11, pp. 150–164 (in Russian).

24. Yulina N.S. (2013) On Rudolf Carnap’s paper “Psychology in the Language of Physics.” Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences = Filosofskie nauki. 2013. No. 1, pp. 120–125 (in Russian).