А.C. Danto and P. Ricœur: Narrative as a Tool of Historical Knowledge

The article comparatively analyzes A.C. Danto’s and P. Ricœur’s theories of historical narration. Ricœur’s synthetic assimilation of Danto’s views is interpreted as a characteristic phenomenon of the dialogue between hermeneutics and analytical philosophy, and in a broader perspective – of contemporary European continental and Anglo-American philosophical traditions. The version of the analytical philosophy of history developed by Danto is interpreted as being formed in the course of overcoming epistemological program of logical positivism under the impact of a platform of linguistic philosophy, pragmatism and neo-pragmatism as well as F. Nietzsche’s perspectivism and the ideas of existentialism. The articles examines fundamental conclusions of Danto’s “descriptive metaphysics” of history, which influence his understanding of a number of epistemological factors and ontological assumptions specific for the theory of historical narration. At the late stage of the evolution of his philosophy of history, Danto spoke of a radical challenge to his views on the part of T. Kuhn’s theory, but he did not give to it a constructive answer. Despite the significant philosophical differences, a number of Danto’s historical narration theory’s theses became acceptable for Ricœur, especially in the light of the American colleague final confession that knowledge of the past is dependent on the kind of existential presence in history specific for a human being. Taking M. Heidegger’s and H.G. Gadamer’s ideas as a basis of his approach to narration problem, Ricœur considered also important the “linguistic turn” initiated by L. Wittgenstein. Offering a positive evaluation of Danto’s analysis of history language, Ricœur simultaneously rightly criticized him for his neglect of the formal instruments of organizing of narrative – plot, intrigue, and composition that should affect the knowledge resources and testify on the unity of narration features in history and fiction as well.

1. Ankersmit F.R. (2007a) Danto, History, and the Tragedy of Human Existence. In: Herwitz D. & Kelly. M. (Еds.) Action, Art, History. Engagements with Arthur C. Danto (pp. 175–190). New York: Columbia University Press.

2. Ankersmit F. R. (2007b) Danto’s Philosophy of History in Retrospective. In: Danto A. Narration and Knowledge (pp. 364–393). New York: Columbia University Press.

3. Anufrieva K. (2018) A. Danto: Narration and Historical Worlds. Tver State University Vestnik. Philosophy Series. 2017. No. 2, pp. 144–156 (in Russian).

4. Blauberg I.I. (2012) Preface. In: Blauberg I.I. (Еd.) Western Philosophy of the End of the 20th – Beginning 21st Century. Ideas. Problems. Trends (pp. 3–7). Moscow: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russian).

5. Danto A.C. (1995) The Decline and Fall of the Analytical Philosophy of History. In: Ankersmit F. & Kellner H. (Еds.) A New Philosophy of History (pp. 70–88). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

6. Danto A.C. (2002) Analytical Philosophy of History. Moscow: Idea-Press (in Russian).

7. Danto A.C. (2007) Narration and Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press.

8. Domanska E. (2010) Philosophy of History after Post-modernism. Moscow: Kanon+ (in Russian).

9. Kearny R. (1995) Entre soi-même et un autre: l’herméneutique diacritique de Ricœur. In: Azouvi F. & Revault d’Allonnes M. (Еds.) Paul Ricœur (pp. 205–218). Paris: Éditions de l’Herne.

10. Kukartseva M.A. (2006) The Linguistic Turn in History: Evolution, Essence, and the Main Principles. Voprosy Filosofii. 2006. No. 6, pp. 44–55 (in Russian).

11. Ricœur P. (1981) Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

12. Ricœur P. (1998) Temps et récit. Vol. I. Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Kulturnaya initsiativa, Universitetskaya Kniga (in Russian).

13. Ricœur P. (2004) La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Gumanitarnoy Literatuty (in Russian).

14. Ricœur P. (2008) Soi-même comme un autre. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Gumanitarnoy Literatuty (in Russian).

15. Vdovina I.S. (2009) Phenomenology in France. Moscow: Kanon+ (in Russian).