“Hume’s Guillotine” in the Interdisciplinary Context
https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2018-12-7-25
Abstract
The authors deal with the classic paradox of ethical theories, “Hume’s guillotine,” based on the contradiction in morality between what is and what should be. At the same time, the theological justification of moral principles is beyond this criticism, because the sacred commandments “by definition” combine what is and what should be, overcoming the “secular” gap between being and duty, and thus “the problem of transition from description to evaluation is removed.” Modern ways of removing this contradiction, revealed by Hume, are considered from several points of view. Special attention is paid to the analogy between the development of ethical and mathematical theories, a synergistic approach to the formation of ethics, as well as to the ethical choice associated with the development of digital reality, which humanity will face soon. A synergistic approach can be viewed as a bridge “over the abyss of two cultures - natural science and humanities.” Now it has become clear that there can be many logics, geometries, versions of analysis of infinitely small, etc. Ethics can also be constructed and then put into practice. A classic example is the ethical code of King Lycurgus. Separate ethical systems are not able to ensure the survival of humanity under extreme conditions. Existence of general ethical rules in global crises allows many to survive. Without them, everyone would die. True amazement is the fact that the eight Dyakonov phase transitions in human history completely coincide with the crises periodicity presented in the text of the Apocalypse, where crises are figuratively called “beasts.” Then a vivid picture is given, a picture of the civilization transformation into a post-singular state, which goes beyond the horizon of scientific forecast.
Keywords
About the Authors
G. G. MalinetskyRussian Federation
Georgy Malinetsky - D.Sc. in Physics and Mathematics, Professor, Head of the Department of Modeling of Nonlinear Processes.
Moscow
A. A. Skurlyagin
Russian Federation
Andrey Skurlyagin - Ph.D. in Technology, doctoral student.
Moscow
References
1. Attali J. (2006) A Brief History of the Future (Russian Translation: Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2014).
2. Butler-Bowden T. (2013) 50 Philosophy Classics (Russian Translation: Moscow: Eksmo, 2017).
3. Burtsev M. & Turchin P. (2006) Evolution of Cooperative Strategies from First Principles. Nature. Vol. 440, pp. 1041-1044.
4. Diakonov I.M. (2007) The Ways of History from the Most Ancient Man to Our Days. Eight Phases of the Historical Process. Moscow: KomKniga (in Russian).
5. Gaginskiy A.M. (2018) The “Hume’s Guillotine” in the Context of the Medieval Doctrine on Transcendentals. Voprosy filosofii. 2018. No. 5, pp. 189-200 (in Russian).
6. Kasavin I.T. (Ed.) (2004) Person. Science. Civilization. On the 70th Birth Anniversary of Academician VS. Stepin. Moscow: Kanon+ (in Russian).
7. Maksimov L.V. (2012) The “Hume’s Guillotine”: Pro et Contra. In: Ethical Thought. Issue 12 (pp. 124-142). Moscow: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russian).
8. Malinetsky G.G. & Kurdymov S.P. (Eds.) (2002) The New in Synergetics: A Look into the Third Millennium. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
9. Malinetsky G.G., Potapov A.B., & Podlazov A.V. (2016) Nonlinear Dynamics. Approaches, Results, Hopes. Moscow: URSS (in Russian).
10. Osipov-Skurlyagin A.A. & Skurlyagin A.A. (2012) The Great Mysteries of the Apocalypse. Origins, Mystifications, Reality. The Results of the Natural-scientific Research. Moscow: Master (in Russian).
11. Pickover C.A. (2009) The Math Book. From Pythagoras to the 57th Dimension, 250 Milestones in the History of Mathematics (Russian Translation: Moscow, Binom; Laboratoria znaniy, 2015).
12. Schwab K. (2016) The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Russian Translation: Moscow: E, 2017).
13. Sychev A.A. (2012) The “Hume’s Guillotine” in the Context of the Institutional Approach of J.R. Searle. In: Ethical Thought. Issue 12 (pp. 143156). Moscow: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russian).
14. Turchin A.M. (2010) The Structure of Global Catastrophe. The Risks of Extinction of Humanity in the 21st Century. Moscow: URSS. Available at: http://avturchin.narod.ru/sgk31short.doc/
15. Waal F. de. (2013) The Bonobo and the Atheist: In Search of Humanism Among the Primates (Russian Translation: Moscow: Alpina-non-Fiction, 2014).
16. Wallerstein I. (2001) Analysis of World Systems and the Situation in the Modern World (Collection of articles translated into Russian. Saint Petersburg: Universitetskaya Kniga).
Review
For citations:
Malinetsky G.G., Skurlyagin A.A. “Hume’s Guillotine” in the Interdisciplinary Context. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2018;(12):7-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2018-12-7-25