Philosophical Problems of Multi-Agent Systems Modeling

Multi-agent systems (MAS) is a technology based on distributed computing, designed to emulate the complex emergent behavior of multiple agents on the basis of various feedback mechanisms. Philosophical interest therein is caused, firstly, by the cognitive properties of individual agents and of the system as a whole; secondly, with the possible modeling of complex social behavior and, possibly, by the perspective of a progress in social understanding. The main problem is the extent to which multi-agent models correspond to the simulated reality. Since they are computing systems, it is necessary to consider the general theory of computations and their ontological status; to determine how the computational processes form rule-like systems consisting of multiple cognitively enabled agents; to make plausible assumptions about the regularities of the evolution of such systems under natural and artificial conditions. Particular attention is paid to the hypothesis of the limited rationality of agents or, what is the same, to their cognitive limitations, which demands the application of epistemic logic formalism to MAS functioning. The obtained results give additional arguments in favor of the well-known philosophical thesis: the higher cognitive capabilities are determined and explained by the complex social organization of their bearers.

1. Aronov I.Z., Maximova O.V., & Zazhigalkin A.V. (2015) Research on Time of Consensus Reaching in the Work of Technical Committees on Standardization on the Basis of Regular Markov Chains. Komputernye Issledovaniya i Modelirovanie. Vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 941-950 (in Russian).

2. Bechtel W. (2008) Mental Mechanisms: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience. London: Routledge.

3. Craver C.F. (2006) When Mechanistic Models Explain. Synthese. Vol 153, no. 3, pp. 355-376.

4. Eiben A.E., Schut M.C., Vink N. (2006) On the Dynamics of Communication and Cooperation in Artificial Societies. Complexus. Vol. 2, no. 3-4, pp. 152-162. doi: 10.1159/000093687

5. Fagin R., Halpern J., Moses Y., & Vardi M. (1995) Reasoning about Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

6. Glennan S. (2002) Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation. Philosophy of Science. Vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 342-353.

7. Kempes C.P., Wolpert D., Cohen Z., & Perez-Mercader J. (2017) The Thermodynamic Efficiency of Computations Made in Cells across the Range of Life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. Vol. 375, no. 2109. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0343

8. Kim P. S., Coxworth J.E., & Hawkes K. (2012) Increased Longevity Evolves from Grandmothering. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Vol. 279, no. 1749, pp. 4880-4884. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1751

9. Knoll J. (2005) The Brain and Its Self. A Neurochemical Concept of the Innate and Acquired Drives. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

10. Makarov V.L. (2013) Artificial Societies and the Future of Social Sciences. In: A.S. Zapesotsky (Ed.). Lectures and Reports of Russian Academy of Sciences Members in the St. Petersburg Humanitarian University of Trade Unions (1993-2013). In 3 vols (Vol. 1, pp. 536-551). Saint Petersburg: St. Petersburg Humanitarian University of Trade Unions (in Russian).

11. MacLennan B.J. (2004) Natural Computation and Non-Turing Models of Computation. Theoretical Computer Science. Vol. 317, no. 1-3, pp. 115145.

12. Mikhailov I.F. (2015) Man, Mind, Networks. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russian).

13. Mikhailov I.F. (2017) Toward the Shared Ontology of Cognitive and Social Sciences. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki. 2017. No. 2, pp. 103-119.

14. Novikov D.A. & Chkhartishvili A.G. (2013) Reflection and Management (Mathematical Models). Moscow: Fizmatlit.

15. Niazi M.A. & Hussain A. (2013) Cognitive Agent-based Computing-I. A Unified Framework for Modeling Complex Adaptive Systems Using Agent-based & Complex Network-Based Methods. New York; London: Springer.

16. Singh M.E. (1994) Multiagent Systems. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

17. Thomas R.W. (2007) Cognitive Networks (Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Engineering). Blacksburg, VA.

18. Turing A.M. (1936) On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. Vol. s2-42, no. 1, pp. 230-265.

19. Vlassis N. (2007) A Concise Introduction to Multiagent Systems and Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Vol. 1. doi: 10.2200/S00091ED1-V01Y200705AIM002

20. Wimsatt W.C. (2002) Functional Organization, Analogy, and Inference. In: Ariew A., Cummins R., & Perlman M. (Eds.). Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology (pp. 173-221). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

21. Wooldridge M. (2002) An Introduction to Multiagent Systems. Chichester: JohnWiley & Sons Ltd.