Cultural Convergence as a Form of Struggle for Global Dominance in the Age of the Crisis of Classical Reason

The article analyzes the current crisis of the world-system, the evidences of which are apparent in various areas of social reality: science, politics, and religion. In this regard, the author argues that all these transformations are associated with a change in the cultural paradigm that can be described as a crisis of the universal mind. Belief in the universal mind, which founded the whole culture of the age of Modernity, is a subject to significant erosion today and it changes the entire landscape of social reality and the meaning of the social practices. Moreover, it affects the functioning of the entire worldsystem by changing cultural priorities themselves. In the past, the theory of modernization assumed a globalization process with the inclusion of all the subjects on the principles of the Western model, but today, due to the belief in the absence of universal truth, the world is segmented into cultural subworlds that are built around particular values and traditions. In our days, there are several civilizational projects (American, Russian, Islamic, Chinese) that are alternative to the classical project of Modernity, based on the the values of Enlightenment. In this regard, the current stage of globalization cannot be considered as the global expansion of the Western (Modernity) project, but there is a competition of civilizational subworlds, challenging the classical Western project. It is obvious that under such conditions the cultural proximity becomes a fundamental resource that allows competitive projects to expand their sphere of influence. When belief in the universal mind and in the existence of the Absolute Truth recedes into the past, it becomes impossible to appeal to universal norms and principles. Therefore, it only remains to appeal to own cultural traditions, putting efforts to make them as attractive as possible for both internal and external “consumers.” Thus, the cultural proximity, which due to the destruction of the universal mind suddenly became a geopolitical value, turns out to be not only a part of an individual’s cultural identity but also a tool for promoting civilizational projects.

1. Bell D. (2015) The China Model Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton University Press.

2. Belokobylskyi O. & Levytskyy V. (Eds) (2018) Watersheds of secularization: Western civilization project and global alternatives. Мoscow: Akademicheskiy proekt (in Russian).

3. Casanova J. (2013) Exploring the Postsecular: Three Meanings of “the Secular” and Their Possible Transcendence. In: Calhoun C., Mendieta E., & Van Antwerpen J. (Eds.) Habermas and Religion (pp. 27–48). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

4. Document 9: How Much Is a Hardline Party Directive Shaping China’s Current Political Climate? (2013, November 8) Retrieved from http://www.chinafile.com/document-9-chinafile-translation

5. Fuller S. (2018) Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game. London: Anthem Press.

6. Husserl E. (1936) Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie(Russian translation in: Husserl E. Philosophy as Science (pp. 101–126). Novochercassk: Saguna).

7. Jasanoff S. & Simmet H.R. (2017) No Funeral Bells. Social Studies of Science. Vol 47, no. 5, pp. 751–770.

8. Khalikov R. (2016) Islamic World Development Project: Origins, Global Mobilization, War in Syria.Ukrainian Institute of Strategies of Global Development and Adaptation. Researches. Retrieved fromhttps://uisgda.com/ua/slamskij_proekt_rozvitku_svtu-_vitoki-_globalna_moblzacya-_vjna_v_sir_skorochena_versya.html (in Ukrainian).

9. Lebedev V.I. (Comp.) (1937) Anthology on the History of the USSR. Moscow: Uchpedgiz (in Russian).

10. Lomanov A.V. (2015) Common Denominator of the Nation. Russia in Global Affairs. 2015. No. 5, pp. 138–152 (In Russian).

11. Post-Truth. (n.d.) In: Oxford Living Dictionaries. Retrieved from https:// en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/post-truth

12. President Bush Addresses the Nation. (2003, March 19) Retrieved from https:// georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030319-17.html

13. The Movement: How Steve Bannon is Spreading Populist Trump-Style Politics across Europe (2018, September 27). Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/steve-bannon-the-movement-europe-populist-nationalism-trump-a8557156.html

14. The President’s State of the Union Address. // The White House. Office of the Press Secretary. (2002, January 29) Retrieved from http://whitehouse. georgewbush.org/news/2002/012902-SOTU.asp

15. Zhidkov O.A. (Ed.) The United State of America: The Constitution and Legislation (Russian translation).